Hotmail, Others Follow Gmail's Storage Boost 623
BobPaul writes "Following behind Yahoo Mail's recent upgrade to 100MB of free storage, and trailing behind GMail's 1GB (last mentioned here), ZDNet reports that Hotmail will soon boost email storage as well. 'The upgrade will increase Hotmail's free e-mail storage limits from 2 megabytes to 250MB and its paid e-mail service, which costs $19.95 a year, from 10MB to 2 gigabytes. The changes will begin in early July.' Another interesting tidbit from the article: 'Ask Jeeves also plans to grant its e-mail subscribers more storage room... According to an e-mail sent to iWon users, Ask Jeeves plans to give each of the sites' e-mail subscribers 125MB of free storage.'"
Yeah, but Gmail's better (Score:5, Interesting)
They have to fix the fact that their services are crap before handing out space willy-nilly.
Does anybody use all that space? (Score:3, Interesting)
This is all well and good, but.. (Score:5, Interesting)
Its funny -- in all the hyperbole about the disk space being offered, people are neglecting some of the real innovations/advancements GMail has managed.
Whats the diffrence? (Score:5, Interesting)
Remember years ago when the max e-mail size wasn't 2mb and you suddenly got mail bombed? You had to go looking through 100's of pages of mail and deleting all the junk. All that work is enough to give anybody carpel tunnel syndrome. Also, Hotmail's recent restriction on opening only one page at a time only makes the matter worse.
The reason why Gmail can give 1GB of space is because it has developed an excellent system of mail archival, retrieval and display. So unless Hotmail changes its interface and pulls something as good as Google, we are soon going to see frustrated users shifting through many pages of spam.
Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better (Score:5, Interesting)
The main problem I have with hotmail is its lack of respect for sent mails, it is up to a user to say they want to save every outgoing message, and even then, they are deleted frequently.
It just stops it being usable for anything other than signups and notifications.
gMail has made it easy and fun once again, and I'm glad the others are panicing.
fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden one (Score:5, Interesting)
If the Gmail interface is as fast as the google interface, gmail will eat hotmail and yahoo for lunch.
Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Is it really a good idea... (Score:3, Interesting)
> I just don't trust a free service provider to care too much about my data.
You are conflating two issues. Of course it's a good idea to have the data stored non-locally. If your office/house burns down, you're going to thank those servers.
Store your data in multiple locations if you're worried about it. Get 2,3,5,10,50 free accounts and treat them like a RAID server if its data you just can't afford to lose.
Whether or not a service is free is irrelevant. Yahoo/Hotmail etc aren't going to want to get a bad name for losing customers data even if you're not paying.
Paging Apple, paging apple (Score:5, Interesting)
Granted, .mac does a shitload more than these others, but, hey, it's time to boost! :)
Re:All the storage I need. (Score:3, Interesting)
Plus, I like being able to check it at work, where all I have access to is a terminal during my lunch hour.
Re:competition (Score:3, Interesting)
gmail availability... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better (Score:5, Interesting)
However, in googles case, leaving the mails ONLINE actually makes for a better solution, since taking the mail offline and into which ever mail applications store prevents the pigeons from sorting and searching my mail, it becomes just a dump, and for that, a smallish standard account is better suited.
I prefer having google searching my personal mails and its grouping and management are better than any of the offline pop mail programs I've tried.
There is room in this world for both types of account, for instance, I wouldn't even consider moving business mails onto ANY of the free providers, thats just suicidal, but for personal mails google just wipes the floor with everything else out there.
Filesharing and backups by email (Score:0, Interesting)
Also a good way to backup those music CD's.
.MAC (Score:2, Interesting)
It is NOW we are getting somewhere! (Score:1, Interesting)
-AMD vs. Intel
-Apple MAC OS vs MS Windows vs Linux
-Nvidia vs ATi
-Playstation 3 vs X-Box 2 vs whatever the next big "N" system is...
I hope my ISP http://www.speakeasy.org follows suit!
Re:Yeah, but Gmail's better (Score:2, Interesting)
Its the most reliable out there: Hotmail doesnt always work, thats why I switched to yahoo.
Yahoo is fast. when i send an email, its to its destination instantly, With hotmail, it usually took over an hour.
Gmail sounds ok: Not sure about the privacy issues...but if gmail made it possible to email LARGE attachments (>100megs)... that would be sweet.
Re:Competition? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:All the storage I need. (Score:5, Interesting)
The real good stuff comes in the form of a clean and fast interface, being able to use Google search on your mail, threaded display of your messages, having webmail that doesn't blast you with intrusive ads, and so on.
Re:fast. lightweight interface vs slow, ad-ridden (Score:3, Interesting)
i don't have to download spam mail from my isp which can take a while on a 56k connection of you have >150 spam emails. With google not only does it sort the spam nicely and out the way, it stops me having to download the body of the email.
Couple that with the other great features of gmail and the fact that i won't fill it and i don't have much reason to use my isp's email address.
The only time i use my isp's email address is for job and university applications.
Re:What about spymac? (Score:2, Interesting)
And completely useless. My email account there does not receive a single message. After some outages and weird behaviour like 3 days to get a message sent to SELF it simply got dormant. Now every single message sent to that address goes AWOL.
The hosting thing is really tricky to work. Expect 2 weeks before your account is set up. I know it's a free service but I think they went overboard on the "1gig" announcement and couldn't handle the load. They are not Google, you know.
My take on it all (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm thinking about rolling my own searchable e-mail archive. And it won't be limited to one poxy gigabyte, either! I could register a domain and point the MX to my TV cable broadband connection, but the IP address is not guaranteed truly static, so there's a possibility that mail could get lost or even wind up on someone else's box -- so I'll trust my existing PO3 connection for now, counting it as another reason to add to my list in favour of a "proper" (read: business class) broadband connection. Next I'll hack Spamassassin to bits: when I'm done, it will store the header info and spamminess test results in a MySQL database, and the body in a text file. While I'm at it, I'll index the attachments in terms of mime type and encoding into another database. Finally, I'll set up some scripts to manage searching according to my databases and body contents.
Eventually -- which is to say, once I can go a month without resorting to phpMyAdmin or grep -- I'll release it; probably under a BSD-like licence, but with this extra little clause: "Any redistribution of the software or derived work in binary form must be accompanied by an offer of the source code, to be valid until the lapse of copyright on the work in question".
Re:Hard disk manufacturers happy campers? (Score:2, Interesting)
Reminds me of the Cold War (Score:5, Interesting)
Gmail only has a couple of thousand users, so it can continue upping it's storage. Hotmail & Yahoo follow suit, but with it's million users, they asplode!
Re:Whats the diffrence? (Score:4, Interesting)
I dread to think what'll happen when he's got 2Gb to play with.
Gmail=Good IDea, Excellent Execution (Score:1, Interesting)
Gmail will succeed because it's interface is a radical improvement not only over webmail, but of email in general. I wish my standard email client had half the features Gmail has, and given time I'm sure it will.
Just like word of mouth spread that Google was a fantastic search engine that did things better than all the others, so too will word spread that Gmail's interface is far and away superior to what the others are offering. Hotmail/Yahoo could offer a terabyte of free space, and I'd still use Gmail because its interface is that good.
The brilliance behind this strategy... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Gmail=Good IDea, Poor Execution (Score:5, Interesting)
I disagree totally. Gmail's two-phase rollout has given Google the option to observe the competition's response and react to it before their service is even officially launched (not to mention creating a buzz that would make Seth Godin [sethgodin.com] proud).
I've had a GMail account for about two months now and the system is in a constant state of flux. I've reported bugs one day and they've been fixed the next. Each and every bug report or piece of feedback gets a personal response from the Google team. They are very serious about perfecting the system.
The only reason Google are waiting so long to launch it is because they want to make sure it's the best webmail out there bar none. When it's launched, that's when the comparisons can really start. And that's when Hotmail et al won't be able to shake a stick at Gmail.
The real war behind the Gig storage battles (Score:3, Interesting)
I'd like to hear about alternatives and what this means for the IT/ISP players in the next few years. To elucidate on all this:
It doesnt take a Ph.D to add 1 + 2; and maybe consider a more standards driven approach as in (3)
(1)Microsoft, Yahoo, eBay, Amazon, etc. all want to have your personal info for targeted advertising. Both Microsoft and Apple are researching a system whereby all the info in your hard drive is easily searchable.
(2)All indications are that most computing will soon be delivered over the (internet) pipes, with broadband available everywhere. ( SUN's original motto, then IBM's, now everyone's)
Well, personally, until the dust settles on the privacy issues I wouldnt mind having a GMail account to use as "light" personal/business info internet folder.
I use my own server VPN connection meantime, so I can already always access all my files from anywhere. But i dont see it being a practical mode for the majority of users - as
(3)which goes back to the issue, might it not be better in the meantime for all ISP's to adopt a standard user-friendly personal data repository, possibly mirroring what the user has at home/office ?
Andre
PS. Slightly off topic, on a personal note: if I'm on target on this issue, that would make it 3 out of 3. (previous posts indicated that the MAC
Gmail speed (Score:3, Interesting)
I have a friend who has a paid Yahoo! account and I sent him an invite while he was over at my place. He logged in to Yahoo! to retrieve the invite (which of course had been placed in the Spam folder, but that's neither here nor there). When he finally found it and got signed up he couldn't stop talking about how cool Gmail was, how fast it was, thanks a lot for the invite, etc. etc.
Then the next day Yahoo! upped their space for paid users to 2 gigs or whatever it was, and all the sudden he was gloating about "I have TWO gigs!".
Yeah, man. Two gigs of a service you were blasting yesterday for being slow and inferior. Whatever.
I guess the point is that to some extent these carrots are working, and they're able to make users forget their pain by offering more space.
I have faith that in time he'll remember how fast his Gmail account is and start moving over there. Our friends and family can be extracted from the dark side - it'll just take some work.
Oh, what? You don't have a Gmail account yet? Well, I gots four invites left - hit me up at kevinomara bat gmail mot com.
Why do people care about the search? (Score:2, Interesting)
There are no cross-references between emails.
(well, besides In-Reply-To, which is not too tough -- finding the first email in a thread is not particularly hard).
I usually search the _web_ for something I don't know a lot about in order to find out more about it. But when I search my email, it is because I am trying to remember a specific detail of a certain conversation. I have to know a word or two in the email in both cases in order to find it anyway.
Look what happens (Score:4, Interesting)
http://gmail-is-too-creepy.com/
Good on google for not censoring it, Cant imagine MS would allow that..
Re:competition (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Too little too late (Score:4, Interesting)
Goodbye Hotmail, you've lost me as a customer.
Re:capitalism's finest (Score:5, Interesting)
1. P2P Applications
2. Binary Newsgroups
3. Bittorrent
4. IRC
5. FTP
6. Messenger to messenger.
6. Now anonymous based e-mail accounts.
The RIAA is currently trying to sue users of #1. They might go after #3, 4 and 5. They can't stop #2 and #6. They've lost, whether you believe that mp3 trading is copyright infringement or not.
Re:competition (Score:5, Interesting)
I trust Google. I trust Yahoo. I don't trust Microsoft/hotmail.
One of the interesting things about how Google has been able to increase the perceived value of their gmail service is that you need an invite (thanks turg [slashdot.org]).
It also creates a "web of trust". People who have been invited by other people are less likely to use a gmail account to spamminate everyone. This is the true innovation of gmail.
Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:competition (Score:5, Interesting)
Consider this scenario:
Hopefully, someone from gmail will recognize the value of keeping the invite system, either exclusively, or alongside a seperate open system.
Anyone want to point this thread to the gmail developers?
Re:MSN Hotmail: behind the competition (Score:3, Interesting)
Yahoo! Mail was the first to upgrade their service following Gmail's storage boost.
If you send email messages to some Hotmail address, they bounce them back to you with no aparent reasons. And don't say that you haven't had some email message bounced back saying "action failed". As I don't save all my email messages, many proofs are gone.
I remember once that I wrote about 10 email messages to a Hotmail.com user and he only got one. In my last message I was asking if he had a non-Hotmail account. I don't know why, but this message wasn't bounced back. He told me that his Hotmail inbox was empty.
Anyway, here's one proof:
She has told me that her Hotmail email account is active, is not the wrong one, and her mailbox is not full nor empty. I have tried to contact her via email several times with no success.
Short version:
64.4.50.99 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
Long version:
24 Jun 2004 14:11:20 -0000
From: MAILER-DAEMON@[removed]
To: [removed]
Subject: failure delivery
Message from [removed].
Unable to deliver message to the following address(es).
[removed]@hotmail.com:
64.4.50.99 does not like recipient.
Remote host said: 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
Giving up on 64.4.50.99.
--- Original message follows.
Return-Path: [removed]
Message-ID: 20040624141120.8231.******@********.****.[removed
Received: from [**.**.**.***] by ********.****.[removed] via HTTP; Thu,
24 Jun 2004 07:11:20 PDT
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 07:11:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: [removed]
Subject: hello
To: [removed]@hotmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Are you getting my email messages?
Note: some email addresses, hostnames (excepting hotmail.com) and IPs have been removed due to privacy issues.
[removed] = email address, username or hostname.
Re:competition (Score:3, Interesting)
The text ads don't bother me - I've noticed they actually are relevant to what I'm working on.
Now if we can just convince them that keeping the invite system is worth it ... (hint hint - email them with the suggestion :-)
Re:Paging Apple, paging apple (Score:3, Interesting)
I've used it a fair bit, since I used to work for a guy who hosted 4 different web sites from his
My impression was, it's way too slow. Apple's only attempt to "address" this issue was to try to cache everything locally on your hard drive in OS X Panther, so it *appears* to be more responsive, rather than solving the real problem.
Not only that, but it only "does more than the others" if you're using it from a Mac. If you have to access a
Apple keeps trying to get more people on-board with
The new large accounts limit how you use them... (Score:2, Interesting)