Nvidia Reintroduces SLI with GeForce 6800 Series 432
An anonymous reader writes "It's 1998 all over again gamers. A major release from ID software, and an expensive hotrod video card all in one year. However, rather than Quake and the Voodoo2 SLI, it's Doom3 and Nvidia SLI.
Hardware Analysis has the scoop, 'Exact performance figures are not yet available, but Nvidia's SLI concept has already been shown behind closed doors by one of the companies working with Nvidia on the SLI implementation. On early driver revisions which only offered non-optimized dynamic load-balancing algorithms their SLI configuration performed 77% faster than a single graphics card. However Nvidia has told us that prospective performance numbers should show a performance increase closer to 90% over that of a single graphics card. There are a few things that need to be taken into account however when you're considering buying an SLI configuration. First off you'll need a workstation motherboard featuring two PCI-E-x16 slots which will also use the more expensive Intel Xeon processors. Secondly you'll need two identical, same brand and type, PCI-E GeForce 6800 graphics cards.'"
Re:When (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:For Rich Folks Only (Score:4, Insightful)
Reliability (Score:5, Insightful)
Other than that the only problem I can see is that you need about AU$2000 worth of video card, and at least AU$1000 worth of Xeon to use it. Maybe for engineers and artists, but will the average person have any use for it? I don't feel that an extra AU$3000 is worth it for the extra frame rate in games.
For the pros though it would be very good though.
4 slots (Score:5, Insightful)
And I'm also wondering how the heat is going to be transferred away from the cards. It looks like you need some serious cooling setup to keep those two babies running.
Bah... (Score:5, Insightful)
Plus, many people were upset about power and cooling requirements. This monster would occupy FOUR slots and require, what, a 600W PSU? (ok, just kidding, "only" 460W should be enough)
Re:nvidia is going under! (Score:5, Insightful)
1: Resort to idiotic 3DFX-like measures to get high performance
Note: A 77% increase in gaming performance isn't "high performance". Considering that the 6800 is ALREADY a massive leap forward over it's predecessor, it's INSANE PERFORMANCE!
How would something like 1600x1200 with maxed FSAA and maxed AF, while never dropping below 60fps, grab you by the short and curlies?
2: Watch company slowly die.
Nobody's suggesting that everyone and their brother run out and get SLI'd GeForces on a Xeon platform. (Those already spending 4-5000 dollars on such a platform aren't necessarily going to shrink from an additional $4-500, especially if it nearly doubles video performance.)
This is going to probably be limited to those who'd normally use Quadro cards (productivity) and the elite few with more money than sense.
Not that everyone won't WANT one...
NDA Leak. (Score:2, Insightful)
All great news.. but WHEN can I find it available in the stores, that would be NEWS.
Dude, this is an NDA leak! If you're trying to imply nVidia is peddling vaporware, well, you might be right, but in this case they're actually not the ones doing the peddling, because their SLI setup is still under NDA.
Re:ALX (Score:3, Insightful)
noticed that they were using two 6800s for their benchmarks?
If I remember correctly... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:For Rich Folks Only (Score:2, Insightful)
Never underestimate... (Score:5, Insightful)
If gaming is what you do a considerable number of hours of your life, why not? Even as a student, it'd be some weekends without being completely wasted (and maybe work an hour or two as a weekend extra), and you'd have it.
All that being said, from what I saw with the last cards it looked to me like GPU speed was starting to go beyond what conventional monitors and CPUs could do. And those really huge monitors are usually far more expensive than the GFX cards, even two of them.
2xGF6800 = 10000 NOK
Sony 21" that can do 2048 x 1536/86 Hz = 14000 NOK
Personally, I'll probably stick to GF4600 until hell freezes over, I just don't manage to get hyped up on the FPS games anymore. I'd rather go with a HDTV + HD-DVDs, should they ever appear...
Kjella
Insane Requirements? (Score:2, Insightful)
Xeons? (Score:5, Insightful)
For starters, the Xeon is still stuck at a 533MHz FSB, limiting its performance. Add in the fact that they're ridiculously overpriced & most games show little to no performance improvement when running on an SMP system. A single P4 or Athlon64 will stomp the Xeon in almost all gaming situations.
Of course, with this tech a ways away & there not really being any PCI-E motherboards on the market now that Intel's recalled them all, I guess they're betting on high-end enthusiast boards to ship with the second x16 slot by the time this thing is actually ready for market...
Really, the biggest application for this kinda power that I can forsee would be game developers who want to see how well their games scale for next-gen video hardware...
Won't Get Fooled Again (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:For Rich Folks Only (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, I bet the developers of the beautiful Unreal Engine 3 [unrealtechnology.com] are using this. Current hardware can't run it at very playable framerates. I remember them saying you'll need 2GiB of RAM to play it maxed out.
Re:For Rich Folks Only (Score:5, Insightful)
you can put together a decent solution for computing now for around a grand. Kick in another $250 for needing a good workstation board to get the right slots and say $600 ($300x2) for the two cards and you're still just under $2000. THIS IS CHEAP. I'm sorry. I know how many lawns I had to mow as a youngin to buy my first pentium 60. That was $2k for JUST the computer and monitor. That included a baseline 1 meg video card, no cdrom and no sound. The cdrom and sound card cost me another $400 a couple months later.
So cry me a freaking river. Get a weekend job. Stop spending so much money on booz. If this is a priority for you, then you'll find the money. If it's not a priority, then quit your pissing and moaning.
Slightly O/T (Score:2, Insightful)
Every serious gamer knows that 86Hz is unacceptable. True gamers know: CRT > LCD / PLASMA. Until you can find me a plasma that can refresh at 125Hz or greater, I'll stick with my 80lb. CRT.
Any gamer extreme enough to buy two of these cards plus the requisite hardware should be smart enough to know that a flat panel is a waste of money for games. Then again, they are gamers...
Re:If I remember correctly... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Never underestimate... (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, duh. (Score:1, Insightful)
Does using 2 video cards really help when we can't use what's alread there?
Ummm.. yes?!
Video cards use bus bandwidth. If we, as you point out, have bus bandwidth to spare, then one solution to using it up would be to put in more cards.
Come on, this isn't exactly rocket science at this'a'here news for nerds site!
Sounds good to me (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:When (Score:1, Insightful)
Cancer Patient at the Pharmacy: "What the....? When did you get cancer medicine? I've got like 2 weeks to live!"
News Anchorman who also happens to be in the Pharmacy: "Well, we told you last year that they were *making* new medicines."
Go have another 420 dave.
Cost? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:For Rich Folks Only (marginal?) (Score:3, Insightful)
"On early driver revisions which only offered non-optimized dynamic load-balancing algorithms their SLI configuration performed 77% faster than a single graphics card. However Nvidia has told us that prospective performance numbers should show a performance increase closer to 90% over that of a single graphics card."
Re:For Rich Folks Only (Score:3, Insightful)
It will be aimed at the hardware reviewers. The resurrection of SLI will get back Nvidia's ranking as Number 1 for high performance video. I would imagine a few gamers with more money than they need will also setup a dual Nvidia system but the primary audience will be those who publicise performance ratings.
Re:"begs the question" (Score:2, Insightful)
While in logic the phrase does indeed mean what you say, in everyday speech it is acceptable to beg an obvious question.
This has been supported by Oxfords Guide to English Usage, since the 80's.
Blv it or not its aimed at ppl who can't afford it (Score:2, Insightful)
This entire thing is really an exercise in besting the competition. In this case, ATI and in this case, they are badly in need of being able to say that they are #1, because ATI stole the crown and hasn't really given it back just yet. This whole mess is really just an exercise in brand building/marketing. Just trying to get people to think of nVidia as the best/etc-- its aimed at those who can only afford one card, trying to influence their overall feeling for nVidia.
nVidia's 3DFX property didn't have much competition back when it first introduced the voodoo sli.. ahh how times have changed.
Obviously not a gamer's market (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:For Rich Folks Only (marginal?) (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:ATI X800 advertisement (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:ATI X800 advertisement (Score:3, Insightful)
Just because you don't see them doesn't mean you don't download them. And if you never click on them anyway...there's no difference to their revenue.
Re:Sounds good to me (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:It's nice to be proven right (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:For Rich Folks Only (Score:3, Insightful)
Not all geeks are poor, and not all poor geeks are beyond saving up and spending a large amount of their income on what interests them.