Macromedia: More FUD About SVG

Robin Berjon writes "Macromedia recently announced that its latest version of Flash Lite (a limited Flash for mobile devices) was to support SVG Tiny 1.1, and support it fully (though no one has yet been able to verify that assertion). For a moment, the Web community wondered if they might be playing nice at last, after yielding to massive pressure from the mobile market to support W3C and 3GPP standards, or if they simply meant to use SVG as a trojan to get Flash into mobile devices. An article freshly published on Macromedia's web site clearly makes the case that they're after the latter, speading as much FUD as possible along the way. Thankfully, Antoine Quint decided to respond in a brief O'Reilly Net article in which he debunks Macromedia's marketing lies one by one, and expands on the wondrous features of SVG Tiny 1.1 and the shortly upcoming SVG Tiny 1.2 that make people drool before their mobile phones. "

"debunks Macromedia's marketing lies"

[Neil Blender]

Lies filled with bunk are the worst lies of all.

Gosh...

[Trillan]

For a so-called debunking, there's an awful lot of "Yes, this is true, but it doesn't tell the whole story" in the article. Quint's article reads like a panic attack waiting for a problem.

Macromedia's great asset

[Rosco P. Coltrane]

Nothing beats a great product naming scheme for grabbing mindshare. Today they launch Flash Lite, but they still have the following absolutely smashing names at their disposal:

- Flash Flood
- Flash Gordon
- Flash Card ...

Im a n00b, Whats FUD?

[nfamous neil g]

What's FUD? all i can think of is"fudged up data"...Am i even on the right track? it would help my future reading of /.

Re:Who Needs Flash?

[Anonymous Coward]

People who do usefull things [xical.org] in Flash?

as well as people who do useless things [pee-mail.com]