Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Mozilla The Internet

Batch-o-Moz: Firefox, Thunderbird, Suite Released 766

bluephone writes "Today Mozilla.org has unleashed a triple threat; Firefox 1.0PR, Thunderbird 0.8, and Mozilla Suite 1.7.3. Wow. Lots of news in all three fronts. so, for your release notes, sys-requirements, what's new, and download links, here you go. Firefox, Thunderbird, and Mozilla Suite. Enjoy."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Batch-o-Moz: Firefox, Thunderbird, Suite Released

Comments Filter:
  • by spiny ( 87740 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:25AM (#10244692) Homepage Journal
    is to convert an I.E. / outlook user to Mozilla / Thunderbird today ...

    go on, you know it makes sense - if anything it'll make the internet faster without all the outlook generated spam flying around.
    • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:35AM (#10244759)
      I did one this week-end.

      The guy (in his 50's) had dramatic pop-up and scumware problems. I pointed him to mozilla + adaware, thinking that, he would not care, because it is not IE.

      Boy I was wrong. He was over-enthusiast. He downloaded it as fast as possible, and now is not using ie anymore.

      I am really impressed, as it is the first time I convert someone over 30.

      Pop-up blocking, annoyance killing is *the* selling point of firefox. I didn't knew how fucked was ie browsing until I talked with this guy. The web was becoming useless for him, and he was driven crazy by frustration.
    • by Yolegoman ( 762615 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:38AM (#10244769) Homepage
      Personally, I wish to wait until FireFox has a standard 1.0 release before converting a user to it. Yes, you did say Mozilla, but I prefer FireFox.

      Even though FireFox @ 0.9 is better than IE @ 6.0, Service Pack 2, I've decided to wait until it has a stable, 1.0 release to "convert" users. Doesn't seem like I will have to wait that much longer. The only reason I do this is because there are a few bugs, imo, that are confusing, to say the least. I can work around them, but at least with my friends using IE, it's not my fault if something goes wrong.

      As for Mozilla Thunderbird... even though it isn't 1.0, I haven't had ANY problems with it. Converting my mom to that was simple enough. I just told her it didn't boot you offline like AOL. :)

      Seriously, AOL sux. My mom is really happy with Thunderbird. It downloads her email, she reads the email, the end. No calendars, headline news, advertisements, etc. It gets the job done, and quite efficiently.

      So: I accept the mission. But I won't carry it out... yet.
    • by falconed ( 645790 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:39AM (#10244781)
      IE is no match for Firefox, but IMHO (and as much as I love it) Thunderbird still needs to catch up to Outlook. Outlook 2003 just has more features and a better interface. Major things I'm waiting on before switching to Thunderbird at work are integration with SynCE [sourceforge.net] and the Novell Connector [novell.com].
      • While I would have agreed with you several months back about Outlook having better features and whatnot, Outlook, for no apparent reason (good ol' MS software), started having a mysterious problem with passwords which meant I couldn't access any of my emails on any of my accounts. Having used Thunderbird in it's early releases, I wasn't too keen about swapping back to it, but I had no other choice (well, apart from webmail, but then I can't tell whenever I recieve emails, which is always a pain).
        After swapping back, I had realised that Thunderbird had improved greatly and I'm very glad that Outlook b0rked up, otherwise I'd probably still be using it now.

        Thunderbird probably does have a lot of features that Outlook doesn't have (or at least didn't appear to have), but I'm perfectly happy with the features Thunderbird does have and I don't require anything extra from it. It's interface looks much better than Outlooks boring GUI and it's junk mail filter is also extremely accurate, IMO - having marked around 98% of my junk emails as junk emails, with only 1 or 2 false positives in the whole time I've used it.

        Anyway, you mustn't forget that features shouldn't be the only reason to swap over.. Outlook does have severe security issues that need to be addressed (anyone have a link to that bug where people aren't supposed to start emails with a certain word, because it makes Outlook think the rest of the email is actually a file? HAH!). Yeah, Thunderbird might have security issues too, but I seel much safer with TB than OL.

        My 2c.
    • by kwandar ( 733439 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @10:29AM (#10245714)
      I'd love to convert a couple of people to Thunderbird at our office, but there is a problem.

      Unfortunately they can't read those stupid "winmail.dat" files that Outlook loves to send out.

      If anyone has a suggestion to allow Thunderbird to automatically read/open these stupid winmail.dat files, I guarantee two new converts, AT LEAST!!!
    • by GreyPoopon ( 411036 ) <[gpoopon] [at] [gmail.com]> on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @10:48AM (#10245895)
      is to convert an I.E. / outlook user to Mozilla / Thunderbird today ...

      I've already converted a bunch of them at work. Microsoft made it really easy for me what with all the ActiveX exploits, lack of features updates, etc. The process is always the same:

      COWORKER: My computer is really slow all of the sudden.
      ME: Have you checked for spyware lately? Run Ad-aware and Spybot lately?
      COWORKER: OK...
      ... 30 minutes later ...
      COWORKER: Wow, there sure were a lot of nasties on there. I've removed them all and things are running much faster. Thanks for the tip!

      ... The next day ...

      COWORKER: My PC was slow again this morning, so I ran Ad-aware and Spybot again. They found all sorts of new stuff. Is there any way to keep this from happening?
      ME: There's three ways:

      1. Stay off the internet
      2. Completely customize your security settings on IE for internet zones to disable ActiveX for anything not in your trusted sites list and live with the fact the lots of sites break when they see you have IE and ActiveX doesn't work.
      3. Install Firefox and use that for all your internet browsing and just reserve IE for the local intranet and the few web sites that don't work properly with Firefox.

      COWORKER: Oh, option 3 sounds good. I'll install it right now.

      The good thing is, my upgrade today to Firefox PR1.0 seems to work on a lot of sites that weren't working with Mozilla, so it's only going to get better. However, the realist in me says that once Firefox really takes off, we can look forward to people finding security exploits in it too.

  • by TintinX ( 569362 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:25AM (#10244693) Homepage
    Warning: mysql_pconnect(): Too many connections in /web/virtuals/mozillanews.org/db_config.inc.php3 on line 2 Database is not availiable
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:28AM (#10244713)
    http://www.spreadfirefox.com/ [spreadfirefox.com]

    and

    http://www.getfirefox.com/ [getfirefox.com]
  • by cs02rm0 ( 654673 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:29AM (#10244719)
    It said my adblock version was out of date, asked if I wanted it to go and update it for me... yes please :)

    WebDeveloper toolbar seems fine.
  • by acroyear ( 5882 ) <jws-slashdot@javaclientcookbook.net> on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:30AM (#10244723) Homepage Journal
    more than half of my extensions, even if they really are compatible with firefox 1.0, still say they're only good for 0.9.x+, not 0.9+, which means that firefox 1.0 won't install and use them.

    biggest pain in the ass -- firefox won't let the user override an extension's compatibility setting.

    I can only hope they all change their settings soon...
  • by phreakv6 ( 760152 ) <phreakv6@gmCOLAail.com minus caffeine> on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:30AM (#10244725) Homepage
    I always thought the names were gonna change as usual when firefox reached the 1.0pre release.. something like firewolf or fire-extinguisher :))
  • by jsveiga ( 465473 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:31AM (#10244729)
    All the themes I was using with 0.9.3 (on WinXP) are not compatible with 1.0PR, and that includes the neat Noia 2.0.

    I wonder if it's really a compatibility problem, or a bug.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:32AM (#10244735)
    Love Firefox, but I wish they'd fix the bugs.

    I am still stuck at Firefox 0.8 under Linux with Enlightenment due to serious focus problems with the recent releases.. And I do not want to be left behind!

    I open everything in new windows and usually close them using the keyboard. That does not work if the focus is wrong, etc. Mouse-centric folk won't notice this much but it is a killer for me.

    I think this is the bug and it looks like it is being ignored:

    252178 [mozilla.org]
    • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:49AM (#10244847)
      I open everything in new windows and usually close them using the keyboard. That does not work if the focus is wrong, etc. Mouse-centric folk won't notice this much but it is a killer for me.

      Agreed, I run across it all the time myself. I use tabs, and other tabs are always stealing the focus as I'm typing. This can be a serious security issue because this will often happen as I'm typing in username/passwords and I'll realize that I've typed my password into some other tab and submitted it when I pressed [return].
    • by Erik Hensema ( 12898 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:17AM (#10245073) Homepage

      The focus problems are partly mandated by the javascript standards :-(

      Basically, javascript assumes you always use windows-style focus and completely ignores the existence of focus-under-mouse (what I use in Windows too, by the way. tweakui can do this).

  • Remember (Score:5, Informative)

    by GarfBond ( 565331 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:32AM (#10244737)
    This is only the Firefox 1.0 Preview Release. It isn't the final 1.0 by any means, though it should be feature complete. It's certainly the most polished one I've seen; I've been using nightlies for a little while now and they've been great so far.

    There's also a new community marketing effort at SpreadFirefox.com [spreadfirefox.com], and one of their first goals is 1 million downloads in 10 days. Come on Slashdot, spread the word, we can do it!

  • Spread Firefox (Score:5, Informative)

    by listening to triplej ( 813299 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:32AM (#10244738) Homepage Journal

    In addition to the release of new versions of Firefox, Thunderbird, and Mozilla suite, the Mozilla Foundation have launched a new marketing campign titled Spread Firefox [spreadfirefox.com].

    The goal is to see 1,000,000 downloads achieved in the first 10 days!

    Get downloading Slashdot.

  • Thank you Mozilla (Score:5, Interesting)

    by adpe ( 805723 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:34AM (#10244751)
    Thank you for making a wonderful browser. Thank you for gaining market share and thank you for stopping this non-standard-compilant IE madness. Image a world where all browsers have to follow Microsofts web standards to have all pages displayed correctly. One or two years ago, I thought exactly this would happen, but with Mozilla and Opera being such great products, websites are now W3C compilant with little IE tweaks. Thank you oh so very much.
  • by TintinX ( 569362 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:36AM (#10244761) Homepage
    ... to the Slashdot rendering problems I have with 0.9?
    My poor F5 key is getting worn...

    Sadly, I think it's an Old Skool Slashdot issue. Will anyone ever drag my favorite site out of 1996 and introduce it to some lovely CSS-P?

    Yours, in hope...
    • by LiquidCoooled ( 634315 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:47AM (#10244833) Homepage Journal
      So its YOU thats causing all the errors on slashdot doubling the server load!

      To fix the screen without redownloading, just increase, then decrease the font size (hold down [ctrl] + mouse wheel up then down).

      Its a PITA that there is a problem in the first place, but thats the way it is.

      btw, has anyone else noticed popups coming from slash (work machine is IE6 on xp sp1) Not even noticed it at home (firefox .9.1).
    • by edremy ( 36408 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:49AM (#10244845) Journal
      I have to admit I find it ironic that the premier "Open Source rules, MS drools!" site works perfectly in IE and needs 2-3 refreshes to even manage to render poorly in Firefox. Black on black text and margin errors and blank screens, oh my.

      There's nothing like being unable to read the latest IE bashing thread because Firefox can't render the /. page.

  • Firefox (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ryg0r ( 699756 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:36AM (#10244764)
    I work for Solutions First [slashdot.org] in Australia, and all we recommend to our customers for their spyware problems are FireFox and Spybot SD, and the little known TDS-3 for more serious issues.

    The mozilla suite have literaly changed the face of the internet for me. Not just pop up stoppers, or tabbed browsing, or it being free. It just cooler, something that IE won't have. How can MS compete with a name like Firefox? Or Thunderbird

  • Finally... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by }InFuZeD{ ( 52430 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:37AM (#10244767) Homepage
    The one thing I was waiting for in Thunderbird. Putting all your POP3 accounts into one main folder.

    I couldn't believe they didn't have this feature earlier and when I switched over from Outlook Express I was severely disappointed that I had to look through two different folders for new mail.

    Hopefully they'll upgrade the spam filter as well... because as far as I can tell it doesn't work too great, or maybe I'm just stupid.
    • Re:Finally... (Score:3, Interesting)

      by shic ( 309152 )
      Thunderbird spam filtering didn't meet my needs either - but SpamPal [spampal.org] in combination with Thunderbird works fantastically. I'm using the service (Beta) Spampal build - I've had no problems so far.
  • Triple threat? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:39AM (#10244779)
    Should this not read "triple treat"?
  • Getting There (Score:5, Interesting)

    by ewanrg ( 446949 ) <ewan.grantham@gmail.STRAWcom minus berry> on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:44AM (#10244816) Homepage
    When I got my new computer, our support staff was too "busy" to setup my system, and I've been using Firefox and Thunderbird ever since. Amazing how you can redefine policy if you're willing to do a bit of work yourself :-)

    However, two things that have kept me from making a greater push into converting folks have been Thunderbird's buggy LDAP support (our company email directory is LDAP) and the lack of a central calendar. Yes, I use the calendar add-on, and am aware of the stand-alone product, but until it can talk with our Exchange server, the conversion process will be painful. I was willing to do it because I prefer having the same system at work as at home (where I run Linux). Most folks here aren't going to be quite as motivated...

    Obligatory Plug - Please read my online novel [blogspot.com]

  • by Spoing ( 152917 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:47AM (#10244836) Homepage
    This is an odd bug...stumped me.

    Situation: If you type in an address in Firefox -- about:plugins, yahoo.com (with or without http:// and www.) -- and hit enter, nothing happens.

    That's right the *enter key* is ignored.

    Also happens for the search field.

    Details: Windows 98 system. RC1 and other recient 9.x releases. Firefox was removed and reinstalled multiple times to avoid this. Works fine on all other systems I've encountered (Win XP, 2000, and Fedora Linux). I found one person who also experienced this, though they were planing the uninstall/reinistall tactic and did not report the results.

    • by Schwartzboy ( 653985 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:58AM (#10244899)
      I've never has the problem you describe on either of my Win98 machines , but then I haven't been home yet to install RC1 on them either. I have, however, gotten the follwing message and some variants after closing some tabs after opening several at once:

      "TypeError: arrViewNodes[j].contentWindow has no properties"

      I can consistently reproduce it by opening a new tab that's blank & then closing after a few seconds or a few minutes without loading anything into it. This is on a WinXP Pro machine (no SP2, thank you very much) with an RC1 install that's less than an hour old.
  • Speed (Score:4, Interesting)

    by DarkSarin ( 651985 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:51AM (#10244858) Homepage Journal
    I just downloaded the new version, and all I can say is WOW!

    Previously, startup times were less than that of IE, now I can honestly say that there is no noticeable difference. It also found /. as soon as the browser was opened, no waiting (previously, on the same connection, there was always some delay--and yes, I know network conditions make a huge difference for this).

    If I can show this to people and say, "hey, look, it even starts faster than IE!"--then they will be impressed!

    Kudos to the moz team!
  • by upside ( 574799 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:52AM (#10244865) Journal
    For my computer at home I prefer a straight binary with no installer crap, but for corporate deployment a multiuser-friendly MSI package is a must. It's the only thing I miss in FireFox. The point is to deploy FF from a server and have it working for low privilege users without them having to do any work.

    There are some hacks about but I haven't managed to get it working in a satisfactory manner. I'd deploy it across the entire organisation (100 or so PCs) at the drop of a hat if I had a working MSI package. It's a school, too, so many accounts and users per machine.
    • by MagicFab ( 7234 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:13AM (#10245032) Homepage
      I recently asked the MoFo for information on mass deployments of FF and this is part of the answer: "[...] Misson Desktop Control [...] assists IS departments dynamically customise preferences. Further Firefox 1.0 will also come packagae with a MSI installer."
    • by mgpeter ( 132079 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @10:40AM (#10245818) Homepage
      On most Windows networks that utilize MSI installers Firefox will not work anyway - the reason, Roaming profiles.

      Currently no mozilla based browser will work "automatically" with roaming profiles. What happens is that a user will create his profile on one computer, move to another, then Firefox (Mozilla, Netscape, etc) will continually ask for a profile since it does not find the one that was created previously.

      This is a major stumbling block for Enterprise acceptance of FireFox. Currently you can get around this by specifying a profile in the command line that launches firefox (make a batch file), but unfortunately every user that uses a computer will use the same profile. (Unless you have an extremely fast network and server which can sufficiently serve 100+ profiles at the same time).

      Another complaint I hear from fellow Adminstrators is the fact that you can easily "lock down" Internet Explorer by using Group Policies through Active Directory. Example, you can easily change the home page of every user by simply creating a policy object and applying it to an Active Directory User Container that includes all of your users. To do this with Firefox would take hours (if not days) depending on the number of installations.

  • by jvmatthe ( 116058 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:55AM (#10244886) Homepage
    The links to MozillaNews are dead currently, so I can't check, but here goes my biggest complaint with Mozilla/Firefox. If you know how I can do what I want, by the way, please reply so I can start using Firefox more efficiently.

    Sure, it may render pages on all platforms exactly the same, and give the same Javascript behavior. That's great, and I appreciate it.

    But what is really getting me down is that I cannot, to my knowledge, browse using keyboard navigation on MacOS X like I can on both Windows and Linux. I use Find-as-You-Type and navigation among links with the Tab key all the time on Linux and Windows, but when I start using my Powerbook I have to give most of that up and use the touchpad.

    For example, in the administration portion of a website that I work on, if I'd like to be able to make a new entry into the database, I can do it all without a mouse on Windows or Linux. I tab among the text entry boxes, dropdown boxes, and buttons and do my work. I can get to another tab and grab some text or a link, and then back to the tab where I'm doing data entry and paste the retreived information. All without the mouse.

    Unless there is something big I'm missing, you absolutely cannot do this on MacOS X with the same efficiency.

    I now work from time to time on all three major platforms: Windows, MacOS X, and Linux. While I like various parts of all three, I have to say that I find the keyboard accessibility of GNOME and Mozilla on Linux preferable to anything on the other two. Then again, Linux is also where I've spent the most time, but it sure was easier to find the keystrokes and customization options I wanted there than it is on Windows (and, so far, MacOS X).

    Incidentally, I have also tried Safari (has the Option-Tab keystroke for navigating a page like I want, but even with Saft it doesn't have good Find-as-You-Type) and Camino (same problems as Firefox) and Mozilla (same as Camino and Firefox) all without any luck. Oh well.
  • by otter42 ( 190544 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:58AM (#10244900) Homepage Journal
    I just converted. Yaay! Mirror, to save their poor souls.

    Firefox [wifi-bourgogne.com]
    Thunderbird [wifi-bourgogne.com]

    However, I don't suggest updating right away if you like how your current firefox is customized. None of my cool extensions or themes made the switch. I especially miss tabbrowser extensions.
  • by ewg ( 158266 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:59AM (#10244909)
    The RSS detection feature doesn't work on Slashdot. There needs to be a link element, something like:
    <link rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="RSS feed" href="http://slashdot.org/slashdot.rdf"/>
    Then this new release of Firefox will display an RSS icon in the status bar, from which the user can create special "feed" bookmarks.
  • Save tabs? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Kokuyo ( 549451 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @08:59AM (#10244910) Journal
    When will firefox allow me to save my tab settings? Or have I just missed the function? That's what keeps me with Opera. Opera remembers the tabs I used last time so I don't have to reopen every single messageboard everytime I go online.

    Another thing is the speed under linux... Is there a way to make that thing load quicker? I don't like to wait a dozen seconds just for the browser to appear.
  • by BigGerman ( 541312 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:00AM (#10244920)
    One of the major, major annoyances for me is inability to open mailto: urls in Firefox using Thunderbird and vise versa (http links in Thunderbird in Firefox).
    Yes, I googled and yes there is a solution involving a shell script(s) and installing arcane extention in 'Fox, but:
    This solution does not work for me; and overall, the shell script thing will be an immeditate turn off for someone converting from Windows (where by the way, Fox and Bird integrate perfectly including even XP login screen).

    So does anyone know if there was any progress on this front with the new releases?

  • New features (Score:5, Informative)

    by numatrix ( 242325 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:09AM (#10244988)
    0.10 is listed as a 'Technology Preview' so there's actually lots of new interesting bits thrown in. From the release notes [mozilla.org]:
    • Live Bookmarks

      You can now subscribe to and read RSS feeds in your Bookmarks. When you visit a page that advertises a RSS feed by using a <link> tag, an (RSS) icon will appear in the status bar. Click it to view a list of feeds the page is offering. Click one to subscribe - this adds a Bookmark Folder that contains all the recent posts from the feed.

    • Improved Find

      Find is easier and more powerful now with our new Find toolbar. The Find toolbar (which shows at the bottom of the browser window) automatically highlights text in the page as you type and has a useful highlight feature.

    • Managing Annoyances and Protecting Security

      You can now open blocked popups, and the Extension install system now blocks all attempts to install software from sites other than update.mozilla.org. Users can add other sites to a list that allows them to offer software, but software is never automatically installed. In addition to these steps, several other measures have been taken to prevent phishing attacks and to highlight when a page is being viewed over a secure connection.

    • Better Bookmarks

      Numerous improvements to bookmarks including more reliable presentation of Site icons, and a split pane view in the Bookmarks window.

    • Strong Encryption For Passwords Available

      Passwords saved with the Password Manager can now be more easily encrypted with strong encryption by creating a "Master Password". If you create a Master Password, you are prompted once per session to enter the Master Password so that Password Manager can automatically fill in site logins. A useful feature for people who share computers with others and want improved security.

    • Improved Compatibility for IE users

      Undetectable document.all support for site compatibility and improved compatibility for keyboard accelerators further smooth the transition for IE users

    • Better System Integration for GNOME users

      You can now configure Firefox as your Default Browser on GNOME, and Firefox will adhere to your GNOME settings for edit field key bindings, etc.

    • And a horde of other bug fixes...
  • by mshultz ( 632780 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:11AM (#10245007)

    Does anybody know how to make Thunderbird only display messages on an IMAP server that have not been marked as deleted?

    I use Thunderbird on my laptop and Outlook on my desktop (have to use it there), and frequently I end up with quite a few messages in my inbox (most of which are deleted) by the time I check my mail again using Thunderbird. There has to be a better solution besides purging all my deleted messages before using Thunderbird every time-- since sometimes I screw up and need to recover deleted messages...

    I've looked in the View-Messages-Customize menu option, but there doesn't seem to be a field for the message's IMAP deletion status- any ideas?

  • webmail (Score:5, Funny)

    by bytesmythe ( 58644 ) <bytesmytheNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:13AM (#10245037)
    The main thing that keeps me from using any PC-based email clients is the fact that I LOVE webmail.

    Hell, I'm just waiting for someone to come up with a web-based browser. I'd switch in a heartbeat!
  • by SinaSa ( 709393 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:14AM (#10245044) Homepage
    O.K so I know I'm replying late and I will probably be missed by the mods but who cares.

    Firefox is getting big. I'm in Australia, so I know our Law & Order episodes are behind you in the Americas, but a few nights ago watching an episode of SVU I saw one of the detectives pull open her laptop, and run a google search. As soon as she did it, I noticed she was using Firefox for win32!

    If it's getting used in show props as a realistic tool, it means people in non-nerd industries are looking at it. That means its getting really big!
  • by Not Public ( 257178 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:14AM (#10245046) Homepage
    check it out.. the rendering of the left column of Slashdot has been corrected in this release,
    as noted under "Major Bug Fixes" #217527 [mozilla.org]

    I don't know how I feel about that
    or what that says about the prominence of /.
    or what that says about the priorities of the moz devs
    ...I'm so conflicted.
  • Favicons? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by TrentL ( 761772 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:16AM (#10245063) Homepage
    I know this is a minor point, but will they ever get favicons working correctly? These are the icons that appear next to your bookmarks. They're very useful when they actually work.
  • written from 1.0pr (Score:3, Interesting)

    by 241comp ( 535228 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:22AM (#10245122) Homepage
    Well, I'm writing this from 1.0pr and I must say that it's pretty decent. It does seem to have rather serious problems with Terminal Services though. The only theme that is half-way usable via WTS is the default. All the button backgrounds are black and with some themes, all the menus are black with black text. Ugh - please, someone think of us TS users!
  • Thunderbird... (Score:3, Informative)

    by NeoSkandranon ( 515696 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:31AM (#10245207)
    Since I got a Gmail account I open Tbird maybe three times a week to see if I forgot to forward anything important to it...

    The main problem I have in converting people to Tbird is that it has no support for outlook, Yahoo or MSN. And yes, I am aware there are programs to do it, but having to say "Well, NO it doesnt check yahoo, but you can download and configure this other little program to make it work" really doesn't present it in a flattering light.
  • mickey mouse. (Score:5, Insightful)

    by vena ( 318873 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @09:52AM (#10245376)
    first, i love firefox, it's a wonderful product.

    but i still have to uninstall before upgrading on many of the machines here, and it's ridiculous now to call this a 1.0PR with that problem still around.

    also, from the release notes:

    It should not be necessary to create a new profile when you upgrade from a previous version of Firefox providing you do disable all extensions from the prior version before upgrading. To do this, open the old version and open Tools > Options and click the Extensions panel. Click on each of the extensions listed and choose Disable Extension. Click OK to close the Options window. Now it is safe to install Firefox.

    if you know this is the case, mister firefox, why the hell does your installer not do it for me?

    you want mass adoption, but you continue with this mickey mouse crap of not being able to handle upgrades in any sort of efficient manor. i'm sorry, but you won't see mass adoption like that, and i'm afraid you've already gained the reputation.
    • Re:mickey mouse. (Score:4, Informative)

      by BigJimSlade ( 139096 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @11:27AM (#10246292) Homepage
      if you know this is the case, mister firefox, why the hell does your installer not do it for me?

      My installer on Windows *did* do this for me. I completely forgot to disable my extensions, but it told me X, Y, and Z extensions were not going to work and would be disabled automatically. Maybe that snippit from the release notes was just blindly pasted in from a previous release?
  • by spin2cool ( 651536 ) on Tuesday September 14, 2004 @10:17AM (#10245601)
    The calendar project (aka Sunbird) got a new build the other day too. It's still in 2.0, but is very stable in my experience, and features are being added rapidly. http://www.mozilla.org/projects/calendar/

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...