Firefox Browser On An Upward Trend 670
carbolic writes "The Firefox browser is ramping up as fast as Internet Explorer is ramping down. According to these stats posted from the Engadget logfiles, IE has dropped to 57% of all browsers used to visit the site, while Firefox is up to an amazing 18%! The Engadget stats reflect an early-adopter consumer crowd and backing those up, this chart from w3schools shows the same trend. I guess CERT's recommendation and a mature product are finally paying off for the Mozilla project. Less than 2 years ago, IE had a 95% lock on the market. Anyone else see a trend here?"
Hmmmm (Score:3, Insightful)
As much as I'd like this to be true... (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft's site can probably claim higher numbers of IE users.
RedHat's site can probably claim lower numbers of IE users
Engadget? (Score:1, Insightful)
C'mon (Score:4, Insightful)
I'm waiting for the CNN/Gallup Poll
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:5, Insightful)
Ah, but this isn't (e.g.) visitors to AOL.com... (Score:3, Insightful)
Just thinking obvious thoughts out loud.
Re:As much as I'd like this to be true... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not more people (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not more people (Score:5, Insightful)
All Mozilla/Firefox now needs is a good update system. Normal users have already been teached by MS that everything magically gets updated via Windows Update. Not so with the browser - if they use something other than IE.
Yes, advanced users hate autoupdates. So what, they can always be disabled. Firefox and Mozilla need builtin autoupdaters that at least point the user to a page when a new update is available. Or preferrably just go ahead and do the update by default. That way people can browse safely even as new exploits crop up.
No trend (Score:2, Insightful)
FireFox is a fantastic product, no doubts about that. But I would really doubt that logs from one site can be used as an argument for an overall trend. The Microsoft website probably has 95-98% of all the hits generated by IE. RedHat, SuSE and Slashdot would have a bigger share of Konqueror, FireFox and Netscape users.... even Lynx =)
There is no point to generalise the results of one log... plus keep in mind that more and more browsers nowadays can "lie" about their identity... just say that FireFox is worth a try, and don't push it any further!
How about some less self-selecting data. (Score:4, Insightful)
Slashdot hits a new low with this one.. (Score:2, Insightful)
self fullfilling prophecy (Score:4, Insightful)
Most IE users (that I know) are pretty much ignorant when it comes to browsers.
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:5, Insightful)
IE and FF (Score:4, Insightful)
Actually IE on an XP box running SP2 is pretty different. This may not be a formal version change but MS did catch up pretty well. Sure, I don't touch IE unless I have to, but the popup blocker, activex manager, extra nag screens, etc go a long way to fighting spyware and help make the web usable. Most people will never switch browsers and SP2 is for them.
I was playing with 1.0PR last night and found the firebird developers have already mimicked IE. The "info bar" [everythingisnt.com] which displays when something is blocked is blatantly "stolen" from IE. Not that I care or even think its wrong, but its interesting to see the browser war heat up again.
MS is catching up to FF while FF is picking what it likes from IE. I do like FF's policy of "looking a lot like IE" because it helps with mass-adoptation and frankly IE's interface and MS's usability are actually pretty good. Its a shame the code beneath isn't so hot.
A growing trend? (Score:3, Insightful)
Although Firefox is gaining popularity the fact is: IE 6 is the #1 browser. Until we (a combination of the open source community, and regular users) can pursuade a lot of ignorant web developers (dont get me wrong, not all web developers are stupid and ignorant, just a small minority that only design for IE) - then the web can still be a hostile environment for non-microsoft users.
<rant> Personally I've been an Opera user for a few years (but reguarly use Mozilla/Firefox, Netscape 4 & IE to check the compatibility of my sites), and I was shocked when I went to a site that said 'You have to download the latest version of IE to view this site'... Sure.. I can run IE in wine, but some people really don't think when developing sites. </rant>
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:5, Insightful)
Meaning
Re:Not more people (Score:4, Insightful)
Who teached you your english?
On a more serious note, I'd have to agree that firefox seriously needs an automatic update system that doesn't invalidate a user's extensions.
Re:C'mon (Score:4, Insightful)
RTFS!
Re:A growing trend? (Score:5, Insightful)
What helps for me so far (100% score until now): If you find an IE-only website, make a screendump of what the website looks like in FireFox, and mail it to the sales- or marketing-dept of the company. You can be sure they contact their developer/ site-maintainer about it.
If you contact the "developer" directly, you can end in a yes/no battle about W3C, so get to the guys with the money instead
Re:So What? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:4, Insightful)
One teensey advantage of IE (Score:2, Insightful)
I mean, come on, take a gander at Firefox when it's in full screen. You precious $1500 MacCinema TFT gets a 1cm swath taken out of it by nothing but grey pixels.
Still, Firefox is awesome, and it'll be a long time before I consider anything else.
P.S. How long before Firefox becomes the monoculture? I mean, it's great that everyone's switching to a product which is decent, doesn't invite spyware in with cookies and milk, and is open source, but still... Monocultures are bad, even when they're good, right?
Re:Workaround (Score:4, Insightful)
Maybe I'm just stupid, but Tabbrowser Extensions is singlehandedly the best extension available, IMHO. Why isn't it even on the mozilla extension site? Is there someway to control the tabs without TE? Specifically the oh-so-annoying way that firefox by default sticks new tabs at the end instead of right next to the parent?
are you kidding? (Score:1, Insightful)
Naturally the trend indicated by logfiles will be more exagerated on a site that caters to tech-savvy users/early adopters--this isn't exactly a secret if you RTFA. Please read the article and links before rushing in with an inane first post. I wish the moderators would read too before modding up drivel like the parents.
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:2, Insightful)
And maybe if we keep telling ourselves it's true.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Does anybody really believe that the 95%+ market share of IE is going to drop to 57% in a few months? We can advocate and yell and scream and whatever we want, but people ain't switching in big numbers.
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:5, Insightful)
It's the truth, and it's pushed as a "Preview Release" and a "Technology Preview". So they should expect about as much as a public beta version of IE from it.
You shouldn't treat Firefox as a polished app, and then pull out the old "it's pre version 1" speak when critcism abounds. It only frustrates users.
Yeah, and it frustrates people with insight of the Firefox status if people whine about pre-1.0 software that's released for preview purposes (says so right on the Mozilla.org front page).
Google's browser stats (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Slashdot Stats? (Score:4, Insightful)
IE's dominance (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:So What? (Score:5, Insightful)
Microsoft didnt make IE out of the goodness of their hearts, they paid staff, millions of hours of development time, a court case with the DOJ, to get this "free" browser out. And we know MS doesnt give things away unless they are either goign to earn profit somewhere else, or to prevent loss occuring somewhere else.
going back to 1996/1997, Microsoft realised that Netscape, the dominant browser at the time, were slowly morphing from "Just a Browser" into something that together with Java resembles an OS. It was a platform that allowed applications to be delivered over the net, making the core OS irrelevent. Have a look at archived docs about Netscape's Aurora, and you will understand why MS was scared.
Secondly the Java & HTML can be developed by MOST students for free. You only needed a Text Editor, a paint package and a freely obtainable JDK. There is no relatively "simple" ways to create windows applications for free. This was the reason why Microsoft gave away Visual Basic Active X edition for free, to get people less intrested in Java, and create More MS centric solutions.
Therefore dont assume that there is no value to MS from Internet Explorer. It is core to them. They only got a bit of a breathing space because fo the Dot Com bust, didnt create as much intrest for Web Applications as originally thought.
Obligatory Mastercard Parody:
- development time: 10000 Man hours
- Cost of development: $1million
- Sending SP2 free to anyone who asks: $1 per CD
Mahing the Windows/Office/Visual Studio triopoly maintained, and seeing Netspace and many other compeitors ground to dust - PRICELESS.
Re:Not more people (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not more people (Score:3, Insightful)
Depends on the auto-update program. An app which simply wants to wrest control of my system out of my hands for the time it takes to update something, as well as not giving much feedback or telling me a huge amount about what it is doing is obnoxious, and I won't use it.
Give me an updater however which lets me choose what I want to download, shows me the commands it uses, (and lets me tweak them if I know what I'm doing, no less) shows me on the screen everything it does while it does it, (including progress indicators, etc) and then generates a meticulous log at the end of it, (so that I know the program isn't sending my info anywhere it shouldn't, and also so that I can fault find if something goes wrong) and I'm sold. A program like that makes my life easier, without violating my right to decide what does/doesn't happen on my computer.
Re:Workaround (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm looking for a replacement.
Bye egghat.
Re:Opera? That isn't dead yet? (Score:2, Insightful)
Opera is argueable a robust and stable browser. However, in the face of IE and Mozilla providing a free browser WITHOUT annoying advertising embedded in it, I don't see much of a future for Opera. The new Mozilla browser also has a great leg up on the Opera browser too by not interfering with the operation of an existing installation of IE. That was a big netscape problem and is a major complaint of people who try the Opera browser. Ditch the forced ads and the interference problems with competeing platforms and they might survive.
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:5, Insightful)
Wouldn't web developers be most likely to use IE. After all, if it is the most used browser (perhaps still >90%) then it is in a company's best interest to make sure their website works properly in IE and not spend time making things working Mozilla if it works find in IE. There was much discussion on this regarding the lack of IE PNG alpha blending support [slashdot.org].
I'm not saying this is a good thing, I'm just saying it seems to be the business attitude. There isn't much financial benefit in spending time to make their website compliant with a browser that has 5% market share if the site is fine in the browser with 95% market share. I do find this shortsighted though, since Mozilla/Firefox could be the dominant browser in, say, 6 months for example. Then all these companies would need to re-do their websites at extra cost so it would have been cheaper to make it compliant in the first place.
Well, why is this suprising? (Score:3, Insightful)
besides, if you want extra gadgetry in your browser, Firefox has a lot of nice extensions and they are extremely easy to install(1).
--------
1) Except for the fact that the the response times from the extension download is horribly slow. Do something about it!
lame statistic (Score:2, Insightful)
Firefox gets faster, IE gets slower (Score:3, Insightful)
Whereas FireFox gets more efficient, has all the features that IE has(infact more) and uses much less memory.The browsing experience is smooth and fast.
A lot of people are hesitant to move to FireFox cos they don't know what it has to offer and Windows ships with IE so it naturally captures most of the market.With just the right kind of exposure FireFox will bloom even more.
Re:And maybe if we keep telling ourselves it's tru (Score:3, Insightful)
Mass adoptation won't come... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Hmmmm (Score:2, Insightful)
Though my personal preference is to leave my client-ID unspoofed, and never return to those sites that insist on being IE-only.
Re:Slashdot Stats? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Slashdot Stats? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, yeah, you don't see this problem, it's my configuration, etc. I've seen it in every version since 0.5, on multiple machines, on multiple OSs. It's the only site Firefox can't render correctly. There have been times I've just used IE on /. since I don't want the hassle
Re:Google's browser stats (Score:3, Insightful)
Contrast this with some people I know who don't realize that they can bookmark things; they use Google to find everything. Want to go to www.espn.com? Go to Google and type "ESPN"! Want to read The Onion? Go to Google and type "The Onion"!
It seems to me that the people who use non-MSIE browsers are also the ones least likely to hit Google 200 times per day, and therefore likely to be underrepresented in the totals.
Re:wikipedia stats are biased, was Hmmm (Score:1, Insightful)
First, Wikipedia isn't yet a mainstream site (in the sense Google is). Which makes absolute numbers (20% of Mozilla usage) unreliable (biased towards Mozilla, Opera)..
Second, it's moving mainstream fast. Which makes trend analysis unreliable as well (biased __against__ Mozilla) (e.g. the page above says, that Mozilla gained only about 0.3% over the course of last 6 months, which is much lower than most other estimates)
Re:[bring on the] self fullfilling prophecy (Score:3, Insightful)
Utter crap.
People should get Firefox becase it's a good browser with plenty of features and none of the same security holes as IE. Not because a site they like doesn't work in anything else. Not because 'omg teh IE is notez teh browser!!1!1! [slashdot.org]' (which the W3C have ). [w3.org]
Accessibility >= Design > Compliance
Re:As much as I'd like this to be true... (Score:1, Insightful)
Furthermore, moving people away from IE isn't going to correct the problem of security flaws causing widespread damages. A much harder problem to solve is the clueless user who will not take the time to patch software. Replacing IE with some other browser isn't going to instantly correct that problem. And if you don't understand that there are going to be security flaws in software then that's the reason why you're not a real developer.
Re:Hmmmm (Score:3, Insightful)
YMMV.
Re:Hmmmm (Score:1, Insightful)
For the most part, mozilla based browsers are farther beyond the specs than IE is behind them. So what you say is more or less true, but misleading.
There are cases where the specs are weird and no one in their right mind implements things to the specs, but that's why they're "recommendations."
Make something work in Mozilla and 99% of the time it'll look exactly the same in Opera. That says a lot for standard compliance.
Re:Firefox desserves this... (Score:3, Insightful)
Oh, and just because an extension isn't listed as "xxx compatible" doesn't mean it won't still work.
Re:Hmmmm (Score:3, Insightful)
Ah? So when were they defeated? I must have missed that.
Re:Not more people (Score:3, Insightful)
Now, they're probably a good idea, but not nessisarily the first thing that should be implemented.