Interview with Tom Lord of Arch Revision System 334
comforteagle writes "Every revision control system has its supporters and detractors, but none is as polar as Arch. Either you hate it or think it is the best thing in revision control ever. Built more around what our beloved kernel hackers use (BK), Arch is definitely a departure from CVS and Subversion. I've interviewed Tom Lord, Arch's daddy, about the application, and he has some -ahem- interesting answers and opinions."
I'm left out... (Score:5, Funny)
They forget those of us who have never heard of it before.
Shouldn't headline read (Score:5, Funny)
How to download the source: (Score:5, Funny)
# export CVSROOT=:pserver:anoncvs@cvs.gnuarch.org:/usr/cvs
# cvs login - the password is anoncvs.
# cvs checkout arch
Tact? (Score:5, Funny)
I'd love to hear his opinion on the vi/emacs debate... that'd get some heads rollin'!
I hate it. (Score:1, Funny)
I hate it! God damnit! What was wrong with CVS? (that's a rhetorical question) It was so easy to just cvs co and cvs up.
Then there's some non-intuitive system that everyon and their dog wants to use.
Bah.
Bah I say!
Re:I'm left out... (Score:5, Funny)
You must be new here.
Re:I'm left out... (Score:3, Funny)
He's got a much higher UID than you but still... I'll wager 200 Quatloos on the newcomer! duu du DAA DAA DAA DAA DAA daa da daaa....
CVS Clunky? (Score:3, Funny)
How can he say CVS is clunky junk?
I use it on my 486 SCO Unix machine and think it's the cat's meow.
Re:Shouldn't headline read (Score:5, Funny)
Argument by Slashdot(r) ? (Score:5, Funny)
Q: What's wrong with Subversion?
A: It sucks.
Q: What's wrong with CVS?
A: It sucks.
Q: Can you be more specific about Subversion?
A: Yes. Subversion is teh suck. I realize that's a little inflamatory, so let me say that the sky is blue, dogs are hairy, and Subversion is TEH SUCK, fagg0t!!11
Q: Can you be more specific about CVS?
A: Yes, allow me to be more specific. It sux0rs. Hard. CVS is teh sux0r.
Q: What's good about Arch?
A: It rules. Also, I have a large penis. Fagg0t.
It's impossible to take Tom Lord seriously (Score:2, Funny)
When given the chance to talk about versioning systems, he spends more time bad-mouthing the competition than
he does promoting his own solution. Did one of the Subversion guys "steal" his girlfriend or something?
Re:No people skills. (Score:4, Funny)
He certainly comes across as someone suffering from Tourette Syndrome [wikipedia.org]. I've been considering the possibility of being classified as a sufferer myself. That way I can "legitimately" shout obscenities at my boss in planning meetings.
Re:No people skills. (Score:1, Funny)
Trekkies only (Score:2, Funny)
Damn.
Hey! Look! (Score:2, Funny)
Re:No people skills. (Score:3, Funny)
He's hampered more by the blind faith of other people in their own way of doing things, and their unwillingness to listen to anything new.
Whatever you say, Tom. *grin*
Dr Fish (who's ALWAYS right)
Re:I'm left out... (Score:3, Funny)
Holy hell. That's not so much unprofessional as infantile. Let's hope Linus never pisses Larry McVoy off...
Linus: "Hey, that's a pretty nasty-ass [redmeat.com] shirt you're wearing!"
Larry: "Yeah? Well, in that case I revoke your BitKeeper licence! How d'ya like them apples? [playgroundlaw.com]
Re:I'm left out... (Score:5, Funny)
I rest my case. Version control makes asshats out of people.
Re:It's impossible to take Tom Lord seriously (Score:4, Funny)
No - he just checked her out
Re:darcs (Score:1, Funny)
No shit, really? What clued you in? The massive ego or the disregard for open source?