If You Had To Vote Based On Candidates' Web Pages 112
Kookus writes "Which party has the best team of web deployers/developers?
Neither main page passes w3c's html validator, but Kerry's has much fewer "errors". These pages do not seem to do well on Bobby either...
Both seem to be using Akamai's HTTP Acceleration/Mirror service which appears to be running linux,
Granted that it is hard to please everyone; which team is doing the best job?"
not slashdot (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:wow, that's dumb (Score:5, Insightful)
also (Score:5, Insightful)
you know, the whole "police yourself before you police others" thing that we hear so much these days.
Re:oh wow (Score:3, Insightful)
| country had WMDs, and now we know they don't and
| didn't.
You need to realize that Bush didn't go to war because of WMDs. He had his own personal reasons for the war. The WMD issue was just their idea at the best way to justify the war to the US population.
seriously (Score:3, Insightful)
1. What did each candidate have for breakfast?
2. Do they snore?
3. Who does your dog bark at more?
4. Do you get better tv reception when Bush is on or Kerry?
5. Who would Leiutenant Worf vote for?
Give me a break already!
Re:Cheap shot... (Score:4, Insightful)
If I were chosing a US president based on their web pages Bush wouldn't even be on the ballot.