What's Next For Mozilla? 528
ezberry writes "After releasing version 1.0 of Firefox, what's ahead for the Mozilla Foundation and the venerable Firefox browser? With 6% of the market, and a notable exclusion from Google's desktop search software, PC World states that Mozilla may be thinking about adding desktop searching to the browser. Using plugins from third party vendors (and more), desktop searching may become a regular part of firefox. The article also talks about Mozilla improving firefox's popup blocker and getting OEMs to include firefox on their machines."
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Thats all they need (Score:5, Insightful)
is all thats needed for world dominance (tm)
LDAP based profiles please (Score:5, Insightful)
Pre-installed (Score:3, Insightful)
Especially if it was with a major manufacturer (Dell, Compaq/HP, or Gateway). I bet IE's marketshare would plummet.
--Ender
and dell's incentive would be what, exactly? (Score:5, Insightful)
Imperial overstretch (Score:5, Insightful)
Venerable? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Pre-installed (Score:5, Insightful)
Besides, come Windows update time, the user would be presented with the following:
WARNING: Windows Update could not detect a secure browser on your system. Using an insecure browser may make you more vulnerable to hackers and viruses. Would you like to install a secure browser (Microsoft Internet Explorer 6) now? Cancel [OK]
What's next? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Pre-installed (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:5, Insightful)
About desktop search, I don't really view it as that important of a feature and not worth too much time. How often do most people search for files on their hard drive - my guess is not that often. I think of it like this - whenever my internet connection goes down either at home or at work, I don't sit there and start browsing my hard drive - that's boring. I turn off my monitor and go do something else. All of my information is tied to the internet - not to my hard drive, so a desktop search feature, for me, is very low on my priority scale.
Re:LDAP based profiles please (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Exclusion from Google Desktop search? (Score:5, Insightful)
An IE icon (Score:3, Insightful)
Marketing problem (Score:5, Insightful)
Most people don't care (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:LDAP based profiles please (Score:2, Insightful)
Mistake? (Score:3, Insightful)
How long will it take Google to back pedal after Mozilla provides its own solution (or has an extension.)
--Sunbird, the real reason we will all stop running MS somday.
Re:Will IE copy Firefox? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Exclusion from Google Desktop search? (Score:2, Insightful)
Pre-installed isn't good enough (Score:5, Insightful)
In the UK, if I bought a new PC with FF installed and then wanted to connect to the internet, I'd have to pick an ISP. They'd then send me a CD (or I'd pick it up from a shop) and that would auto install their customised version of Internet Explorer and tell FireFox to push off.
Back to square one again.
What is needed is to encourage ISPs such as AOL and BTInternet to provide FireFox as their browser.
Don't touch my browser (Score:5, Insightful)
The next big step is to continue to market it. Companies will realize how many problems using Firefox can alleviate, and as it gains more users and attention, it will gain more bug reports (you'd hope).
As mentioned in another thread, a vendor might want to include Firefox as the default browser (please include plugins) because they deal with SO many service calls regarding adware/spyware/viruses. I forget the statistic but it's mind-boggling and IE is costing vendors more money than it's worth.
What's next? = I'm worried (Score:5, Insightful)
2) Feature creep
3) Increase market share
This is the point where much software starts to go down hill. It happens with open-source stuff as well as commercial applications. Things that one check box become a whole screen of options. The product goes from 10MB to 100MB. More "non-features" are added that average users don't want.
A better idea at this point is to go back and refactor portions of code that aren't clean. Or to eliminate options by making the browser smarter. Fix security holes.
If they want to add features beyond this point, I believe they should fork the product into some sort of "advanced" version. I don't want desktop searching. I don't want a better popup blocker (AFAIK - It is absolutely perfect as is!). I don't want even one checkbox in the preferences. Mozilla and Firefox do very well with mom & pops, which is very important for gaining market share. For every new feature or option, you alienate them a little more.
Even in a fast-moving field such as software, there is a time to slow down the pace or even stop.
Or... (Score:4, Insightful)
~D
Re:And Microsoft's incentive would be what, exactl (Score:3, Insightful)
Even supposing Dell have nothing to lose, what do they have to gain?
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:5, Insightful)
Because a browser is where most people now go to perform full-text searches on large sets of documents (via Google).
If you think of it as treating 127.0.0.1 as just another part of the internet, it does make a certain amount of sense.
Re:And Microsoft's incentive would be what, exactl (Score:4, Insightful)
Decrease in support costs.
Forget search; focus on centralized administration (Score:5, Insightful)
There needs to be an easy (pref with GUI) way to define and distribute a policy that, for example, sets and locks proxy settings, sets and locks the default web page, "brands" various portions of the browser and that restricts the ability to load extensions at will. This should work cross-platform in order to make it easier to adopt other desktop operating systems.
It would also make it easer for Windows-based IT shops if patches/updates had an MSI file with just the updated files/settings. If you want widespread adoption, you have to at least make it as easy to deal with as what they have now. Microsoft may issue tons of patches, but they aren't that difficult to get on the boxes.
There may be ways to do some of this via a prefs.js distribution, but that's not going to fly in the hostile corporate IT environments where the sole admin left (due to outsourcing) is forced to find a way to distribute a prefs.js manually across thousands of diverse desktops.
IE settings can be managed by the IEAK and various GPO settings under Windows and that is a big sell. Mozilla/Firefox needs an equivalent.
I'd gladly help but I can barely find the time to work on my own, pathetic, foray in to the open source world [rudis.net], let alone contribute coding time to the best open source browser on the Net today. I'd be glad to share extensive requirements with any folks who have time time/energy to take up this noble effort.
Re:An IE icon (Score:2, Insightful)
Then I delete the IE icon from the desktop and taskbar leaving it only in the start menu and as a finishing touch I set the default homepage in IE to http://www.stopie.com/ [stopie.com]
Surprisingly, I've gotten very few complaints.
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:3, Insightful)
K.I.S.S. (Score:5, Insightful)
Why has Firefox rocketed in popularity when Mozilla has been around forever? Partly because they stripped out the mail/news reader and all of the other bloat that was unnecessary for a good web browser. ~4 MB download for an excellent browser. That's all I want and need.
The direction of Firefox specifically should proceed further down that road. Fix the bugs, make sure rendering is perfect according to web standards, and focus on the browsing experience. Continue to refine security and privacy features.
Plug-ins are fine; they leave the choice of including them to the user. But for Mozilla, just leave the browser lightweight and work on the way it does its job.
Re:Don't touch my browser (Score:3, Insightful)
I wanyt them to do a complete feature freeze and spend the next year cleaning up code, tweaking and making it more efficient.
too many apps are written the "new way" of "Ohhh! add that feature and ship it!"
I want features removed, and time spent making the thing as good as it can get.
Companies and Programmers just have no pride in their code anymore. It's how fast can we ship it, not how good can we make it.
I bet they can still squeeze a 10-20% speed improvement out of it.
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:What's next? = I'm worried (Score:3, Insightful)
Boring but (Score:5, Insightful)
Generally concentrate on making a better browser. If you go for world domination, we'll end up with a half-assed mess that doesn't do everything that people would like it to do. I like Firefox because its a web-browser, nothing more.
Re:Don't touch my browser (Score:4, Insightful)
Companies take that approach becuase it works. Loose a bit of stability and security (and maybe speed), but get the shiney feature in there. If one app does this, while another freezes ti make everything cleaned up and efficient, the 2nd will get slaughtered commercially (assuming they are roughly equal in other things).
FireFox is open source, so the developers don't have to do this. However, developers often prefer adding new stuff, so on an open source product that is what will get done. Plus a lot of people involved seem keen for it to grab some market share, so it has to compete with other browsers. Back to new features.
As a programmer for a company, I'd like to add it's often not about pride, there is a deadline to meet. The company has to make money, or I won't have a job. I like when I can take the time to do it properly, and be proud of it, but sometimes you just have to hack it to get it to work. You can be proud of the hacks though :) they are often quite ingenious little fixes, even if they aren't elegent or the most efficient.
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:3, Insightful)
The way I see it, I go to google to do searches, not a browser. Should the browser implement e-commerce just because people go to amazon.com to shop?
Right in the foot, Ren! (Score:1, Insightful)
FireFox is light, tight and focused - That's why it's on my PC. If I wanted a browser that burrowed into my OS I'd use IE. If they want to produce a desktop search engine please let them develop it as a seperate product.
Re:desktop-feedback@google.com (Score:2, Insightful)
Lack of creativity (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Marketing problem (Score:3, Insightful)
First, cool your jets. Firefox only went 1.0 yesterday, and before then there hasn't been a free, production-level browser that appealed to IE users. Windows techies have been trying various versions of Mozilla/Netscape for the last 3-4 years, and up to recently they haven't liked them.
Second, wrap your mind around the fact that "IE works just fine..." really is true for most users (except for some corner-cases).
If your attitude is that it is mainfestly obvious that IE sucks, your experience differs from most people's and it is no wonder they won't listen to you. Face it, the sell of FireFox is "Like IE
Finally, I see the exact same attitude almost daily in the Mozilla Lovers community. People complained for years about how bloated the AppSuite is, and the response was basically "Is Not".
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:2, Insightful)
You Can also try my system called POPsearch http://www.popsearch.net/ [popsearch.net]