What's Next For Mozilla? 528
ezberry writes "After releasing version 1.0 of Firefox, what's ahead for the Mozilla Foundation and the venerable Firefox browser? With 6% of the market, and a notable exclusion from Google's desktop search software, PC World states that Mozilla may be thinking about adding desktop searching to the browser. Using plugins from third party vendors (and more), desktop searching may become a regular part of firefox. The article also talks about Mozilla improving firefox's popup blocker and getting OEMs to include firefox on their machines."
Plug-in or regular part? (Score:5, Interesting)
What's next ? - more market penetration ! (Score:3, Interesting)
If Firefox can reach the 10% threshold, it should snowball from there.
I'm personally converting everyone I know - usually against thier will - to switch to Firefox.
With a 10% + market share, it'll be a major boost for Open Source !
I've been saying it for months.. (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Plug-in or regular part? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:and dell's incentive would be what, exactly? (Score:5, Interesting)
No, more like cutting down their service calls when people's browsers stop downloading and running viral/spyware shit without their knowledge.
Will IE copy Firefox? (Score:5, Interesting)
However, what is to stop MSIE from copying all the features that made Firefox so good? Are simple features like "tabbed browsing" patented/patentable?
And Microsoft's incentive would be what, exactly? (Score:4, Interesting)
It's a two-way street. I don't know exactly how much Dell pays MS for their OEM OS's, but something tells me it wouldn't be a major hurt to buck the system. Besides, I imagine Dell and Microsoft have a contract in place for prices-- I doubt Microsoft can just arbitrarily hike the prices up because Dell grows a spine.
Cornfused (Score:5, Interesting)
A day out off the presses, and it's "venerable"?
The adjective "venerable" has 2 senses in WordNet [princeton.edu].
venerable -- (impressive by reason of age; "a venerable sage with white hair and beard")
Are you talking about Netscape 7, Mozilla 1.x, Firefox 1.0, or what?
Re:Imperial overstretch (Score:2, Interesting)
The platform's already there. They just used it to make a browser (and Thunderbird, each Suite component, Venkman, etc.)
XUL enabled Firefox to happen. Not the other way around.
Firefox wouldn't be the only thing that's deathly slow on a 3 year old machine
Popup Blocking improvements (Score:2, Interesting)
We're already seeing sites like CNN telling us to turn off our popup blocker to use it. Rather than flooding us with popups because we have to turn it off for all of cnn, users would be able to just release the popups that were needed to proceed.
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:3, Interesting)
I guess that some of the criteria above might be triggered by mirror sites, but that seems like the kind of thing that might be resolved (in my uneducated opinion, so be kind) by entries in something like robots.txt on the main server -- perhaps in the form of "hey these sites are my mirrors, so don't flag them as scam sites, FireFox!".
*shrug* I'm sure there's a fatal flaw somewhere there.
Why should I need desktop search? (Score:3, Interesting)
So let's keep it a plugin for people that choose to have it, and not force people to it.
btw I am a XUL developer myself, SiteBar Sidebar is what i make.
Java/Javascript On A Per Site Blocking (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:3, Interesting)
But Balmer's speeches and reality some times diverge greatly.
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Imperial overstretch (Score:2, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Plug-in or regular part? (Score:2, Interesting)
I agree with the statement completely. I'm tired of a good product adding on a bunch of stuff the user does not need to make it do everything. What really is dumb about this is that then you have a bloated product that does one thing good and a bunch of other stuff sub par. Just spend the time refining what product you have and making sure it is secure.
I don't need one program that does everything I will get the programs I want that are excellent at the tasks they are designed for.
Re:Plug-in or regular part? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Rank them by importance (Score:2, Interesting)
An extension that gets passed the site domain, and checks the domain against a built in list, and presents an image based on the list. If the image doesn't show, you're being phished.
The list could be refreshed either per day or on user request.
Now, it does mean that someone, somewhere has to be the maintainer for that list.
SVG, please (Score:5, Interesting)
Firefox can already be built with the SVG option enabled. It does a good job at displaying static SVG right now. With Cairo rendering support taking shape, there will be a solid stable multiplatform rendering engine for it, readily available. And it is not a huge addition to the footprint.
Why not make SVG support a default part of the development build starting now? That way it will be properly stress-tested and debugged before the next release.
Corporate Deployment (Score:5, Interesting)
One thing Mozilla and Firefox really lack is a quick easy way to deploy & maintain them in an orginization. A MSI based installer with security updates provided by MSP (patches to the MSI install) would allow Windows administrators to deploy and maintain Firefox via an Active Directory Group Policy...
Marketshare is meaningless for browsers (Score:3, Interesting)
1) It's a free product in a marketplace for free products. Opera is the only company that really needs to care about the marketshare, because each user is either 30$ for them, or a stream of advertising money.
2) All users are different. Do you count downloads, installations, number of users, number of people using, number of companies, number of page visits, number of hours spent using it, etc., etc.?
Because of 1) it doesn't really matter which indicator will you chose for 2), they are all pointless.
Re:Popup Blocking improvements (Score:3, Interesting)
I second this (Score:4, Interesting)
Also, a single place where they can auto force settings in a corp, like proxies, and other settings.
How about fixing bugs? (Score:2, Interesting)
Too often open source developers run after the next wizbang thing without finishing their work. Thus, only a few great projects with outstanding developer leads actually complete the rigorousness required to make them globally acceptable applications.
I'm sure this will be modded down as a troll, but as a lead on an open source project that requires true enterprise quality, I'm begging you guys to keep at your great project until the kinks are worked out a little more.
As far as the 'next big thing for browser functionality' goes, I'd like to see browsers replaced with a single video/voice/IM/Whiteboard/edit-in-place-HTML application. The web is all about communication. That communication can finally change from simple downloadable text (ala BBSs and Mosaic) to a bi-directional P2P multimedia communication platform. Do that, get rid of the bugs, and the Mozilla/Firefox/Thunderbird teams will own the web.
Re:Will IE copy Firefox? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:LDAP based profiles please (Score:3, Interesting)
I currently prefer opera (Score:2, Interesting)