Service Pack 1 for Windows Server 2003 429
mithridate writes "Microsoft has posted the Windows 2003 Service Pack 1 Release Candidate. eWeek has a short review of the service pack. My favorite quote from the article is, 'The company argues that the improvements are important enough that applications should be changed to accommodate them.' I know I still have not installed SP2 because of the problems it causes with SQL Server, I can't wait to see what kind of havoc it causes on the servers..."
Looks like they are starting to understand? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Service Pack vs Version (Score:2, Funny)
Winver will show you exactly what version you are running, and what the build number is.
Let me get this straight.. you're pissed off because they threw "extra" into the service pack instead of releasing a new version and charging you for it? I think your wallet is too fat, and is affecting the bloodflow to your brain..
Time travel corrupts builds! (Score:1, Funny)
Well duh, the code got corrupted in the time machine you used to get the Windows Server 2003 SP2.
Re:Microsoft Pre-judged? (Score:1, Funny)
MS breaks applications after only a year or so? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Win2k & Server 2k3 (Score:3, Funny)
Perhaps that has something to do with the fact that Windows 2000 only has service pack 4. This "Service Pack 6" may be some ill-meaning program, sounding like it is helpful, like an internet speeder or something.
I know you just mistyped, and I'm being a real jerk. I understand why that mistake may be made. First, NT, which 2000 is upgraded from, is on version 6a. Internet Explorer, the default browser on 2000, is also at version 6 something. Same with outlook express, default mail application. WAIT! 3 programs all at version 6? That's 666. MICROSOFT IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL
CARRIER LOST
Comment removed (Score:3, Funny)