GNOME Foundation Elections Results Are In 158
PaaChhaa writes "The GNOME Foundation membership and elections committee has announced the preliminary results of this year's elections for the board of directors. There are a few new faces this year, and Miguel de Icaza, whose candidacy was rejected last year due to late submission, is back. The run up to this year's election saw a threat of boycott, which ultimately resulted in the online publication of the foundation's financial records. Also, a heated discussion followed the posting of the list of ten questions, and the opinions of the candidates and other foundation members on these issues can be found in the foundation-list archives for the months of November and December. A notable exclusion from this year's board is GNOME's release manager Jeff Waugh. who didn't run at all."
Mena (Score:4, Interesting)
No More Spatial Browsing Please (Score:2, Interesting)
Please, please take away spatial browsing. Noone I know wants it. Every time someone talks to me about their first foray into Linux(avec GNOME) they complain about it. They all hated it in Win95 and they don't want it now. They all leave with the impression that Naultilus( and by extendtion Linux) is, well, unusable. (They're only lusers, bless them.)
Seriously leave spatial browsing as an option from now on. Not the default.
All replys, comments and links to points of view in favour of spatial browsing are welcome, as I am genuinely facinated and bemused by this point of view. Who exactly like spatial browsing and why?!
Elections? (Score:2, Interesting)
The person who contributes the most stable code get to be CTO, the one who got the most companies to pony up $$$ is CFO, and the one who can listen to the most complaints without going crazy becomes CEO!
Just my vote!
Sun Exclusion -- Java vs .Net? (Score:2, Interesting)
Does this maybe mean that
Re:Sun Exclusion -- Java vs .Net? (Score:2, Interesting)
- Has Sun been included or excluded from the board of directors? Sun is not there, there were not enough votes for any Sun member to win.
- http://foundation.gnome.org/about/charter/ used to say "GNOME Foundation will oversee the technical direction of GNOME." now http://foundation.gnome.org/elections/overview.ht
Partial List of Tasks of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors must perform a broad set of both technical and non-technical tasks including:
- Help set overall direction for GNOME.
- Arbitrate technical disputes between maintainers.
Google for more of the same.
Spatial browsing and the Mac Finder (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:No More Spatial Browsing Please (Score:5, Interesting)
Still, I agree that the "new window for each folder" thing is a bad idea. Why not follow FireFox's success and go with a rocker/radial approach? Middle-click = open in new window, rclick + scrollup = up one level, stuff like that? Just have the context-menu list the rocker gestures and hotkeys alongside the command names.
Re:No More Spatial Browsing Please (Score:4, Interesting)
### I can't understand why they won't even offer the old one as an option, except that it would mean admitting that they might be wrong.
They follow more or less the principal of doing it right, instead of flooding the screen with options. And as basically everybody will agree the old dialog was just plain awfull (beside the tab-completion, which was really good), so I think they prefered to dump it completly to have it finally dead, instead of dragging it around for another few releases. Until they get proper typeahead implemented, it will be of course a bit painfull, since 'Ctrl-L' is really a rather ugly hack, however it gets the job done and the dialog is already much more pleasent to use with the mouse, so the damage isn't that big and time will most likly fix the rest.
Re:Spatial browsing and the Mac Finder (Score:2, Interesting)
And the 'cohesive paradigm'? Oh, so a browser which follows a 100% tree structure, where going up goes up a level, opening a folder changes the view, and so on is not cohesive or clear? Most people find it plenty clear.
And what is this, "An open folder is a window; a window is an open folder"? So, all windows are folders? Tell that to all the other programs on the system! You might say that they aren't the Finder, but the windows look just about identical, so no one cares. It's the same with any other browser, anyway: A window of a folder is an opened folder.
That was one of the most singularly bad arguments for spatial browsing that has ever been presented. Maybe the rest of there comments are of at least some value, but what you quoted has quite inspired me to assume they are incompetent and not waste my time reading them.