Firefox New York Times Ad, Soon 389
An anonymous reader submits "CNet has an update on the status of the New York Times Firefox ad. According to the article, the delays are largely because of the decision to go with 10,000 names rather than the original 2500. The amount of content means each change to the ad requires 15 minutes of rendering. They also must be careful in crafting the ad, so that stay on the advocacy side of things. As a non-profit, they can still qualify for the under $50,000 rate, but if the ad is too commercial, they would need to pay the $130,000+ business rate. They say they're close to finishing, and the ad should run by mid-December, or at the latest, by Christmas. Firefox is also close to 10,000,000 downloads in the first month of release."
Too commercial? (Score:5, Interesting)
Expect NYT sales to surge... (Score:5, Interesting)
10,000 names?? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Instead of names (Score:2, Interesting)
It would perhaps be better to have the source code in the advert, but the idea remains that they are free to do that kind of thing, as only open software can.
'Rendering' time is such a lame excuse (Score:0, Interesting)
Re:Firefox Hurting Linux (Score:3, Interesting)
Marketshare would assume a commercial site; even my bank lets me use Firefox.
Timing (Score:5, Interesting)
Exposure (Score:5, Interesting)
I can already see how this will turn out (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:I wonder... (Score:2, Interesting)
Seriously, it's supposed to be like all advertising - getting the name out so that people are aware of it. People like the neighbors of a friend of mine, whose computer is soooooo slow because of adware, but didn't know there was an alternative to IE. If they see an ad like this, then a year from now, they might mention it to a friend "Oh, yeah, there's an alternative to IE....fire...something..." and the friend might find it. But the name is out there, and it will spread. Slowly, but it will spread. (Until it reaches critical mass, after which it will really take off!)
--LWM
Re:Firefox Hurting Linux (Score:1, Interesting)
I may soon inherit another PC and am seriously contemplating keeping it Windows-based for games and some web dev. As for a general advantage, Windows still has a better software-install system. You run it, it installs, you're happy. With Linux, sure you've got various package managers but it's still a hunt for compatibility. Of course you can do what firefox does and install it in ~/ -- which I'm not too fond of.
I prefer and use linux on my main PC...but occasionally have to borrow a Win32 machine to open stuff and access some windows-only cruft.
i don't get this. (Score:5, Interesting)
I don't understand why Firefox is blowing 50K to put an ad in the NYT. A single ad is not going to cause anyone to adopt the browser - it is well known that ads take a lot of impressions to get someone to get action on it.
As a "thank you" to the community it is pretty weak as well. It thanks only the NYT bottom line.
A well-hyped $50K 1.0 launch party would be a better way to generate press and motivate people to switch to the browser. It would get far wider coverage than a single page in one edition of the NYT.
Re:Too commercial? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Firefox Hurting Linux (Score:3, Interesting)
Look into Neopost, Hasler and Postalia (now Francotype?). The secret is to switch from one to another every few years, so that you are always getting their low, introductory rates. If you're using the small, one-piece machines, that's eminently practical.
Man just run it already (Score:4, Interesting)
If they're the kind of people giving money to an open source browser project, I doubt they're going to raise much of a fuss if their name doesn't get specifically mentioned.
Re:Exposure (Score:3, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:name branding? (Score:3, Interesting)
I have a public account on my Mac for my friends and they could not figure out which thingy "got them on the internet". I created an alias for Camino, a Mac native port of Mozilla, on the desktop named "Internet", and the problem went away.
Re:Power of the masses (Score:3, Interesting)
When Firefox came along though, it won me over. It simply doesn't crash like Opera does.
Norway (Score:5, Interesting)
One ad is useless (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Too commercial? (Score:2, Interesting)
The NYT is ultimately only responsible to its owners. They can decide Disney is a non-profit entity if they so choose, or decide that a company that rich can afford to pay double. There's no need for checks and balances. If the advertisers feel hard done by, they go to a competitor.
Re:Timing (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Firefox Hurting Linux (Score:3, Interesting)
Doesn't the latest XP service pack disable popups in IE by default? From what I've read, popups are the most profitable methods of advertising as well as being the most annoying. In order to block other advertisements with FF the user has to act independently with extension installs and most people probably won't bother
Re:Too commercial? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:10,000 names?? (Score:2, Interesting)
I originally wanted to get the ad out to the community for review, but there were a number of complicating factors... and now that we're almost ready, I think that it actually works to our advantage to make it a surprise. I've had a lot of eyes from the immediate Mozilla family look it over (mostly the core developers and the good folks at SilverOrange) and we think that the ad stands up well and will be well-received by the community.
In the interest of process and history, I'd love to post all the revisions that the ad has gone through so far once it runs, starting with my initial sketches to the final piece... Excellent idea! Thanks!
Re:10,000 names?? (Score:2, Interesting)
I would assume you would be using standard postscript or PDF, but nothing we do at work (i work in prepress) takes more than 15 minutes to render (even an 8 page imposition) except for DSC 2.0 files. They can take 15 minutes for a 8x10.5 to an hour or more to render even a single 19x30 poster.
Re:Checks and balances? (Score:2, Interesting)
Put it in EUROS or GOLD (Score:2, Interesting)
At the least hedge it by putting 30% in USA gold certificates at kitco.com and 30% in Euro banks, and 30% in USA cash funds earning SFA.
Re:10,000 names?? (Score:2, Interesting)