Bringing Down A Copycat Site 468
Nigel Cross wrote in with an interesting story from the world of software fraud. Cross writes "I found a copycat site fraudulently selling my own software and kept a record of the steps it took to bring him down."
More than just copyright violation... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:/. it (Score:5, Insightful)
MailList: Used by Spammers? (Score:1, Insightful)
I don't know if I want to feel sorry for a guy that sells and develops spam software. I guess there are legitimate uses for Mailing Lists, but just because there are a few people using it legitimitely (sp?)... doesn't mean it's not used to increase spam.
Other than that, this is nothing new. Have a problem, contact the ISP... wow... what a revelation.
Great job (Score:5, Insightful)
sadly, you know as well as I, it won't be long before your copycat starts up on a new hosting server and does the exact thing again.
Re:Oh, fer fsck's sake.... (Score:2, Insightful)
He won with a counter threat (Score:5, Insightful)
Shouldn't he just change his business model? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:More than just copyright violation... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:MailList: Used by Spammers? (Score:5, Insightful)
That said, some of the tools the software provides do look like being tailored towards the bulk advertising market...but they too also have some legitimate use...
Re:MailList: Used by Spammers? (Score:5, Insightful)
Give us a break. Can't have it both ways. The guy is just trying to make a living. If someone uses it to send spam, it's THEM that are at fault, not the writer of the software.
It's the same as guns don't kill people, people kill people.
Re:I don't really feel sorry for him at all (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:More than just copyright violation... (Score:5, Insightful)
Not far enough. (Score:5, Insightful)
Send all the emails to the admin at the host.
Do not give this bastard an even break. He obviously will not give others a break.
"Bringing down" a copycat (Score:2, Insightful)
A few days later the software is up on the site again
How is that "Bringing down a copycat site" ????
Wheres the screenshots of a hacked and defaced Copycat website?
Wheres the sentence from the judge putting Mr Copycat behind bars?
Wheres the info about the other 5 sites that went down at the same time?
Nobody has brought down anything yet, except maybe some laughter that can be heard all the way from Pakistan.
Re:MailList: Used by Spammers? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:More than just copyright violation... (Score:5, Insightful)
Piracy is one thing. You are getting something for nothing. You *could* place a dollar value based on what the software would normally cost but that's about it.
To misrepresent your self as another company is a form of flat out fraud. In this case someone was getting money for someone else's work, taking credit for someone else's work, and one could argue causing them harm through this misrepresentation. After all the guy was asking for credit card numbers. Not only is there the dollar value of the software someone else profited from but the possibility of harming the character of the rightful owner. Would you do business with a fraudster? Would you use their software or reject it? Would you tell others to reject it?
I will not say piracy is OK in this reply. I will say that bootlegging is greater offence. And to misrepresent your self as being the owner of code that doesn't belong to you and use this lie to make money one would be no better than.... I don't know.... SCO.
Re:Xequte Software trolls slashdot "editor" timoth (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:MailList: Used by Spammers? (Score:4, Insightful)
Mailing lists are useful to:
-clubs
-websites with subscriptions
-charities
-schools
-businesses
-newsletters
-friends
and all of these are legitimate uses. I am not denying that spammers use these tools as well, but far more legitimate users use bulk mailing programs (think of the tens of thousands of clubs, websites, charities etc who use them) than spammers. Spammers may generate more email, I agree. But there are more legitimate mailing lists than spammers.
P2P, as I understand it, uses over 50% of the traffic on the internet (random source from google search) [cachelogic.com], so I think it could be said it does a lot more damage to the internet through being a bandwidth hog.
Don't get me wrong, spam is a royal pain in the arse. But the guy has done nothing wrong. And the fact that his software is a useful tool for a few spammers doesn't change the fact that most users are likely to be using it for legitimate purposes. Most spam is sent from Windows computers. Most windows computers are not used for spam. The developers of windows are not at fault for the other uses their software is used for (like running 3rd party spam apps).
What you are saying is that Microsoft should stop complaining about pirated software because they are responsible for most spam, so the sell software to exactly the sort of people who pirate their software.
Re:MailList: Used by Spammers? (Score:2, Insightful)
Welcome to
* If breaking the law helps me get free stuff (piracy) or hurts Microsoft somehow then it is not only OK, but moral.
* If breaking the law might cause me some distress (stealing my logo, sending me spam) then that is evil and bad.
Got it?
Was it smart to post this? (Score:2, Insightful)
Maybe the Pak site would have objected to his forged email, but maybe they don't care a bit - the article certainly makes it sound like Nigel was about to give up in frustration. Now the copycat site knows that..
Re:More than just copyright violation... (Score:4, Insightful)
People who gets tricked gives their personal details, credit card number to such an asshole.
I think developer was too polite or something. I'd do what network solutions suggest, call law department.
His problem is solved but that guy will definitely continue to do business (!) with other peoples software. Why? He didn't have cops showed up at his door.
Remember, because of Bin Laden asshole, Pakistan and USA law departments are nearly connected to each other. I liked to note it for those people who thinks Pakistan is (yes) backward country and they could do nothing about it.
Re:More than just copyright violation... (Score:2, Insightful)
Also the main point was the misrepresentation of the product. When I download a movie, I dont rename it "The Dean Movie" and mess with all the credits.
I am more than happy to give out any of the movies, music, paintings, or code that I have worked on over the years, but if someone were pretend it was thiers and sell it to make money, that is fraud.
Remember that copyright law was invented to reward innovation, and make sure everyone got what they deserved, not as a tool to lock down information markets.
A Better Strategry (Score:5, Insightful)
Forward a pointer to the bogus site [e-buyonline.com] to Microsoft's legal department. Notice the name? Notice the font used? Doesn't it look like it's designed to resemble Microsoft's logo? This is precisely the type of thing Microsoft Legal prosecutes with a vengeance.
Hey, just because you hate Microsoft doesn't mean you can't use them to your advantage occasionally...
Re:Step One: (Score:3, Insightful)
Generate random mail addresses and test extreme conditions? Also if it works, use that screenshot to show how powerful it is.
I am not developers friend or something but I can sure imagine why since I have a coder friend coding opt-in maillist software for huge online store, tested EXACT SAME WAY.
Somehow, on this story, I felt like I am at download.com comment trollheaven.
Re:Not far enough. (Score:2, Insightful)
He won? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: Spam Software (Score:3, Insightful)
Sometimes mailing lists need to be anonymous.
Re:Hardly steps (Score:3, Insightful)
Fh
Re:Taking down spammers. (Score:2, Insightful)
RTFA
If you think the Police in Afghanistan has nothing better than chaing online fraud scammers, selling software for $1.2, you are gravely misstaken.
Re:More than just copyright violation... (Score:4, Insightful)
So, you'll download free software, but you draw the line at paying $2 to download pirated stuff, because you are far too honorable for that. Got it.
Either way, if the software author can't sell his software because it's being distributed (for free, or for cheap) by someone else, he ends up out of business.
Just a question (Score:5, Insightful)
Today we have this story where someone was selling pirated software taking credit from the creator, but because this wasn't some giant software company overwhelming there are modded responses about "way to go", "stick it to 'em", etc. etc.
My questions is what is the difference between yesterday and today? Both folks committed copyright, trademark, and fraud, but because its the work of some smaller outfit it is more of an evil than the same thing happening to "Evil giant corperations"?
Piracy is theft. Fraud is Fraud. Infrigement is Infrigement. End of story. It doesn't matter if its small guy or giant huge megacorp.
I hope that the creator(s) of this program nail this guy and take 'em to the cleaners. Its times like these that lawyers are not an evil word and lawsuits in federal court aren't either.