Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Technology News

Time Sharing Cars 298

timmy_walker writes "This article from the associated press talks about new car time share services from ZipCar and Seattle-based Flexcar, where "Customers make reservations via computer or telephone, and the company uses remote-access systems to control who can use the car when.""
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Time Sharing Cars

Comments Filter:
  • Running late? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Lord_Dweomer ( 648696 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @10:43PM (#11224698) Homepage
    Can anybody here who's familiar with similar systems comment on how reliable it is? I mean, I've lost count of all the things that could mess with the scheduling required for a system like this...traffic...accidents...slow driving...getting lost...

  • Keeping them clean? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bfizzle ( 836992 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @10:45PM (#11224707)
    How do they keep people from smoking in these things or keeping people from trashing them? Spilled coffee Someone's kid getting car sick Fast food wrappers Someone's homless person or dog shitting all over the thing? Seems like their would be a huge reduction of accountibility for these cars.
  • by RomanD ( 844958 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @10:46PM (#11224718)
    I agree about public transportation but this is why Zipcar must offer something that is not possible with taxi or public transport. Pickup trucks per hour for example. Living in a college town like Boston, people are always moving things but being away from home and parents no noone has cars/trunks.
  • Won't scale well (Score:3, Interesting)

    by FuturePastNow ( 836765 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @10:47PM (#11224727)
    This may work on a small scale, but I know how people treat rental cars, and many people trash the cars that they own. I'm supposed to drive one of these things after Comic Book Guy does God knows what in the back seat? I don't think so.

    Right now these companies have a limited membership that they can screen. But this will never survive the transition to big-time.
  • Dent-and-scratch (Score:4, Interesting)

    by ZeeExSixAre ( 790130 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @10:52PM (#11224761)
    Who's going to be responsible for all the dent-and-scratch stuff on the cars? Sensors wouldn't pick it up because it's not violent enough. Unless people are examining the cars before they get to the next user, there's sure to be a lot of finger-pointing.

    In metro areas, bicycles are vastly faster anyways. If you can stand to get sweaty, that is...

  • by Cervantes ( 612861 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @10:53PM (#11224766) Journal
    There are times when public tranportation is useful... I was a bus man for many years.

    But, frankly, there's times when it's a pain... it's off-peak hours, the weather is crappy, you have to go a long distance with several transfers, you're picking up something that can't be easily carried around, you're going on a date (well, not YOU, per se... but a non-slashdot reader).

    I got quite sick of planning to be on the bus several hours per day when I worked on the far side of the city, but I couldn't afford the incredibly outrageous amounts for a car.

    I mean, come on folks... it's a freakin CAR, it's not made of gold, it doesn't come with a built-in treasure map... why in the name of Linus should a chunk of metal that explodes dead dinosaurs to move cost $40,000+, and have insurance, consumables, and maintenance that can add up to many thousands per year more? I think they're priced that way because we're all conditioned to think that they should be expensive.

    But, I digress. I wish this had been available when it was the right time of life for me to use it... a convenient way to have occasional access to a vehicle (an occasional requirement in a city with an extremely low population density like Edmonton) without having to bend over and take it up the ass from all the fuckers who seem to think that because the word "auto" has 4 letters, all the associated costs should have 4 digits (significant). I hope projects like these get more coverage, and help stop the rush of people going out to buy cars they can't afford with loans they can't afford on income they can't guarantee.
  • Re:nice but (Score:4, Interesting)

    by Atrax ( 249401 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @11:00PM (#11224807) Homepage Journal
    Public transportation is more convenient and cheaper.

    This is very true, as long as where you're heading is serviced by public transport, without and excessive number of changes.

    I work about 15kms outside the middle of Sydney (North Ryde). Luckily, I live within a short walk of the main bus terminal in the Centre (QVB). If I lived in the Eastern Suburbs somewhere, I'd have to catch a train or bus in, then my usual bus out again, which is frankly a pain, and quite time consuming. None of my immediate colleagues use PT for this very reason. It's painful for them, so they drive (and incidentally bitch about the traffic). I don't think it occurs to the two who live close to each other to carpool, but that's another story.

    Now cycling, that's different. It's a good ride on a decent day, takes roughly an hour for me, which is only 15 mins more than the walk/bus combo. It's more environmentally sound than Public Transport, you've as much freedom of destination as with a car, and your health is miraculously improved (though your chances of being maimed by traffic are probably higher). The initial investment is only a couple of hundred bucks, if you're not a gadget freak like me and end up spending way too much on titanium bits.

    Of course if more people used PT, then PT could service more areas, this is obvious, but as things stand public transport is only a partial solution (and I'm an advocate of it)
  • It's too expensive. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Schmucky The Cat ( 687075 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @11:03PM (#11224835) Homepage
    FlexCar charges both by the mile (35 cents) and by the hour (9 dollars) with a small number of free miles for each hour (generally 30).

    I live in Seattle and haven't been enthused about it.

    To take a flex car to somewhere close but inconvenient that isn't served by bus, say a doctor appointment where you need time, is going to cost about $30 just for the time.

    Or a trip to a nearby city, (Seattle to Everett) that might take an hour to drive there and back, but easily put 100 miles on a car... again, $30.

    At the $30 mark, you can easily get a rental car for the entire day. Most real rental cars have enough free miles to make nearby but long trips.

    Truly I don't know anyone who pays for FlexCar out of their own money who keeps using it.

    I'd really like it if I could just grab a FlexCar on some one-way trips, like when I see one parked in a Park and Ride, it's cold, and my bus is late... but you have to return it where you find it and it's not quite so spontaneous to take them. C'est la vie, it hasn't worked for me.

  • Re:Won't scale well (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday December 30, 2004 @11:10PM (#11224875)
    Why not have a rating system, like Ebay.

    When you receive a car, you score the condition it is in online. If you want a good score, you better make sure the car is clean when you are finished, even if the pig before you made a mess.

    Each member is then scored based on how he handed the car off to the next person. Groups can then be formed around ratings. Each group has a minimum score - if a user meets the requirement, he can join the group and borrow the car.

    This way, slobs who don't pick up after themselves, or who don't really care if the car is well cleaned will get that type of car. Neat-freaks will receive perfectly clean vehicles.
  • flexcar in San Diego (Score:3, Interesting)

    by mo ( 2873 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @11:11PM (#11224879)
    My condo in downtown San Diego only has one parking spot which is permenantly claimed by my wife's car (it's nicer than my car). If I didn't have to commute via car every day I'd gladly subscribe to the flexcar that sits a block away. Heck, the subscription would pay just for the parking spot that car occupies. I can see this being a real benefit in other places where parking is brutal like beach areas or other urban centers.
  • Re:Dent-and-scratch (Score:4, Interesting)

    by tverbeek ( 457094 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @11:45PM (#11225051) Homepage
    Why, exactly, do dings and scratches matter?

    Seriously, I've never really understood this fetish people have for mint-condition vehicles. My last car had a noticeable dent in one of its side panels for years. I saved a small fortune by not having it restored to factory condition. And yet its "car" functionality was completely unaffected. And since the guy I ended up selling it to just wanted a means of transportation (not a penis substitute), this "defect" didn't even affect its resale value. And when you're talking about a vehicle the drivers won't even own... why should anyone care if there's a ding in the door?

  • by human bean ( 222811 ) on Thursday December 30, 2004 @11:51PM (#11225081)
    When I lived in town, I realized that I was spending money on a car in order to drive it thirty minutes per day. I would drive fifteen minutes to work, let car sit for ten hours, drive fifteen minutes home, let car sit for ten hours, most weekdays. I found that I really only needed a car on the weekends.

    Then one day, my beast of burden sat down on the side of the road and died. There was no cure.

    So I went down to the local rental place, and made them a deal. I simply told them that I would like a car every weekend starting on Friday evening and that I would bring it back Sunday. I let them keep the deposit on file. They got steady business, I got whatever I needed (a clean, maintained car, truck, SUV, or convertible).

    Sure, it was not all roses. There were times when I needed a truck but had to use an SUV. The Caddy convertible was not always available, but I got by. Low and behold, when I am totalling up the charges, it came to no more than the cost I spent on my old car. Go figure.

    Now I live in the woods, so a ride is a necessity, but if I ever move back to the core, let me tell you...

  • Kind of Pricey (Score:4, Interesting)

    by iamatlas ( 597477 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @12:31AM (#11225330) Homepage
    $8.50 to $12.50 an hour, plus $25 application fee and $100 deposit. In NJ, you can rent a car for as little as $25 a day. (Ford Focus) If you need a car for more than 2 hours or so, a rental is about as economical. A "quick run to the store" can be done with public transportation. Sure, there may be rare circumstances under which this is better than a full-service rental, but maybe not so much to build a business model on.

    Also, in a "time-share" you actually own something. Here, you are basically just a member of a club. Maybe this is all just a scam to get you application fee and $100 deposit, while paying for a rental car to boot.

  • Re:nice but (Score:2, Interesting)

    by jhw3 ( 839537 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @12:52AM (#11225443)
    I lived in Cambridge MA until this past spring and was a Zipcar member for about two years. The system is streamlined and works incredibly smoothly. Any problems I had with car bookings were my own fault (i.e. booking a car for 11 p.m. instead of 11 a.m.). It works so well with the Web that it is impossible to imagine something like Zipcar being workable before the Internet age.

    For a long time, Zipcar tried to foster a sense of community in which abusing the cars (leaving garbage, empty fuel tanks, smoking, etc.) was highly discouraged. It would happen occasionally, but it was rare. They had somehow avoided the "tragedy of the commons".

    Zipcar really fills a niche. It's not meant to be a bus replacement service, but is incredibly convenient for groceries and (especially) evening outings to MBTA-inaccessible suburbs. It was also really handy for times when you needed a van or station wagon. Overall we got by car-free in Boston with the help of Zipcar and public transit for everyday commuting (Zipcar isn't meant for commuting and those who use it for that purpose end up paying a lot).

    When I left Boston Zipcar seemed to be moving in more of a "fancy lifestyle" direction, stocking their fleet with Mini Coopers and other snazzy but not necessarily cost-efficient cars for those who wanted to impress. I hope this move doesn't destroy the hippie public spirit of Zipcar.
  • by sharkfish ( 54213 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @01:21AM (#11225569)
    ...wonderful. Chicago has great public transportation, and since I live in the city, I don't feel the need to own a car. However, there are times when a car is handy, such as when I bought a 35 inch TV. I-Go let me rent a van/SUV which looked darned near brand new. After keying in the code, the ignition turned and off I went. I had the car for six hours...returned it right on time on a weekend evening and went home to enjoy my new TV and home gym. No, I didn't aim to buy gym equipment that day, but what the heck, I had the vehicle... I hope this concept grows. It is very convenient and makes good sense. The suburbs are great for shopping....but that's about it...need a car to get there when I have to suffer the trip to "homogeneous land".
  • Re:Dent-and-scratch (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Tassach ( 137772 ) on Friday December 31, 2004 @01:22AM (#11225576)
    Why, exactly, do dings and scratches matter?
    They matter because the cosmetic appearance of a vehicle is a pretty reliable indicatator of how well the previous owner maintained it. Someone too lazy to wash their car or fix minor dings is also probably too lazy to change the fluids reguarly and do other routine maintenance.

    They matter because little dings, left unrepaired, become big rust spots.

    They matter for the same reason that small holes and stains in your clothes matter.

  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @01:31AM (#11225637)
    Who needs a $40K car to get around? For $2K, you can get a perfectly fine and clean car that will last you 5 years. I bught a $4K Forebird that lasted me 7 faithful years, and that's with me absolutely running it into the ground due to not keeping it in shape with SIMPLE common sense. Had I not neglected the car, I'd probably still be driving it. My next car will be a $2K Grand Prix. I fully expect this car to last 5 years. You should read Click and Clack's thoughts on buying used cars.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 31, 2004 @03:44AM (#11226079)
    Well lets do the math... I can go to Budget [drivebudget.com] and rent a car for the full day in NYC for around $70 with unlimited mileage (I have to pay for gas of course)... or I can go with ZipCar and pay $65 [zipcar.com] for the full day.... Where is the BIG savings?

    Plus I have to pay an annual fee of $50 and a 1 time application fee of $25 plus $100 refundable membership fee [zipcar.com]. They should definately make it cheaper and then a lot of people in NYC would join....

    P.S:by the way with coupon codes, Budget can go down to $45 on weekday full day rentals

If all else fails, lower your standards.

Working...