Xfce 4.2.0 Released 275
kelnos copies and pastes: "The Xfce Team is pleased to announce the availability of Xfce 4.2.0, the next major version of the Xfce Desktop Environment and Development Framework for Unix and Unix-like platforms. Xfce 4.2.0 can be downloaded here. Xfce 4.2.0 includes new applications like a session manager and an application finder, a new and beautiful icon theme, support for bleeding-edge features (like the X.org Composite extension), usability and performance improvements, better support for multihead desktops, new and updated translations, additional themes, and various other improvements over the previous stable releases. See this page for a complete list of changes between Xfce 4.0 and Xfce 4.2. Furthermore, Xfce 4.2 is the first desktop environment to ship with an easy-to-use and platform-independent graphical installation wizard, which takes care of compiling and installing Xfce on your system. Visit the os-cillation installers website for download links and instructions. If you want to try Xfce 4.2.0 first, without installing anything on your system, you might want to try the Xfce Live Demo 0.2, provided by os-cillation, to discover the power and efficiency of Xfce."
How lightweight, if it requires gtk+? (Score:2, Interesting)
Oh, wait, I found it. It requires GTK+. Hm. Are there any good WMs which don't have any gtk+ or Qt dependencies? Remember, I said GOOD. I've used wmaker and its ilk, but something a little more modern would be nice.
Oh, and I'm also familiar with DSL [damnsmalllinux.org], but I hate Debian...
Best Alternative (Score:5, Interesting)
Building. (Score:3, Interesting)
Is this release substantially slower/more bloated than the 4.0 release, and less so than the 4.1 release? When I went from the 4.0 release to the 4.1 release, my system couldn't take it and still remain reasonable (I have a junker running FreeBSD). So how does 4.2 run, for those who went right ahead and installed the release? I wonder if there will even be packages built for this version for the 4.x tree.
License confusion does not inspire confidence. (Score:5, Interesting)
From the download page of the Xfld.org website [xfld.org]:
They have an obligation to do exactly that--keep the licensing straight--so they aren't distributing something they don't have a license to distribute. Perhaps it is time to comb the distribution and make sure the licensing is correct.
ION (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Best Alternative (Score:2, Interesting)
why did they had to make those flash moves so damn fast that you cant really follow them.
Re:One reason why I'm still using Window Maker.... (Score:5, Interesting)
The thing is, it's so hard to quantify so its impossible to file any meaningful bug reports.
My best guess right now is that Windows seems to draw things to the screen when it is fully rendered so the entire menu/window/dialog will appear at the same time. In KDE I notice that sometimes windows will appear but will be drawn a second time after they are displayed. Perhaps it displays the text first and then redraws the icons or something.
Well this comment is starting to sound like meaningless blather, but I can't describe the problem much better.
FYI I almost exclusively use Linux, so no I'm not a microsoft troll.
Great for multi-user boxes (Score:5, Interesting)
Its slick, light, windowsy-enough to not scare newbies too much, and the lab has run for over a term with no problems.
I set the servers up to give the users a choice of connecting to the Linux boxes or Windows boxes, and 95% of the connections are to the Linux boxes....
Baz
Toolkit API wrappers (Score:3, Interesting)
Such a "Toolkit--" could be a good enhancement, or spinoff, of the Gtk/Qt unification projects underway. The holy grail is a single build with style features from any toolkit selectable at runtime, without stopping the use of any program due to toolkit dependencies. "Style" includes under-the-hood features like IPC message buses and HW support. Open source is so mutably refactorable - let's leverage that main asset, and have it all!
Re:License confusion does not inspire confidence. (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:How lightweight, if it requires gtk+? (Score:3, Interesting)
No, ION [cs.tut.fi] is as light as you can get (or ratpoison, but let's be realistic and err on the side of usability). Windows ary typically full screen, without borders. Everything is basically in "workspaces", b/w which you switch by alt-1, alt-2 etc. Works like a charm on that server if you still want to use a browser or GUI apps every now and then.
Re:Best Alternative (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Toolkit API wrappers (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Toolkit API wrappers (Score:3, Interesting)