Mapping Google Maps 442
jgwebber writes "Google Maps is starting to cause a bit of a stir as Google makes the browser do still more backflips than most expected. In the tradition of dissecting Google Suggest and GMail, I've done a little dissecting of this newest service."
what about plotting waypoints on the map? (Score:5, Interesting)
It would be awesome if Google could completely take over the commercial mapping software application market (ie Streets and Trips/Mappoint and Street Atlas) by enabling routing/directions between the points on the map. Hell, allow us to then download the planned route back to the GPSs via a GPX and that would really rock. I mean web-based applications such as maps.google.com and maps.yahoo.com have already taken over from older programs like Automap which just gave text directions and simple maps. Why can't they add even more features? I don't know anyone that asks for directions anymore. Everyone just uses the web-based software.
For now I'm just happy being impressed by the pretty scrolling. I'm excited to see what comes of this after the finish up the Beta.
Still doesn't work with Safari (Score:2, Interesting)
Hell if I were a browser company I'd pay Google a small consulting fee just to find bugs in my browser. You know, give them some cash and say "have your javascript fellows write the most fucked up thing you can, i am paying you to break my browser".
Combination (Score:2, Interesting)
- Nice company
- Cool services
- Sweet interfaces
That is a rocking combination.
The fact that they seem to be making stuff available under Firefox as well is also great.
Safari support (Score:1, Interesting)
I also think it bears noting that Google is pulling out all the stops to build rich web apps, no matter how weirdly they have to hack the browser to make them go. And I strongly believe that this is a trend that is here to stay -- XHTML Strict/CSS/etc be damned. At the end of the day, what really matters to users is compelling apps that let them get their work done quickly.
I'm not necessarily complaining, as I can use Firefox, but it is too bad that even Google can't get a webpage to render properly on any modern browser, such as Safari.
Oh well, I don't know that much about any of these 'browser hacks' that Google is doing, but hopefully their promised Safari support will come soon.
Usage... (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:what about plotting waypoints on the map? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:what about plotting waypoints on the map? (Score:2, Interesting)
While I've fiddled with it and found the interface to have it's up-sides and down-sides (not really very big considering it's a web app.) I think you're looking for functionality at a whole other level, i.e. competing with Delorme or such, which could prove a challenge. I've got the Delorme package on my PC at home and the volume of information its processing to produce things would kill Google's servers. Besides, Delorme is Topo and Google's isn't, and Topo information is actually very useful when travelling. When I moved west I drove a truck, pulling a trailer with my car on it, up a road I never should have taken. Perhaps the squiggly road on a decent map would have given the appropriate clue, not to take that road because of the high pass. Google could at least include some elevation data in their images as an option.
Google Search Results (Score:2, Interesting)
For some reason, if one enters an address in Google Search to find a location on a map, the resulting search results still point to MapQuest and Yahoo!Maps. (See example) [google.com]
They need to update that.
new Google browser (alpha) is intriguing (Score:3, Interesting)
I like it! (Score:1, Interesting)
I am going on travel this afternoon and I had already printed out my maps and directions from "another service (MapQuest).
Today, I did the same using Google Maps, and I found the interface much easier to use, the maps pretty good and the driving directions less complex and easier to read than the ones I usually get from other services.
I say "pretty good" on the maps, because of two things: First, several of the maps had slight discontinuities when I printed them, versus the way they looked on screen. At the left edge, there was a vertical seam where the map pieces were shifted with respect to each other. Not a big deal, as this had no great effect, but has anyone else seen this? Second, the shadows from the "start" and "end" push pins obscured some of the map information and blobbed the end of the route a bit. Does anyone know how to turn off the shadows?
Just my experience, YMMV.
smp
Nice as a video game engine (Score:4, Interesting)
Google not promoting their own map app? (Score:2, Interesting)
Why aren't competitors beating Google to market? (Score:5, Interesting)
I have three answers. I wonder which ones are valid:
1. Laziness
2. Encumberance with legacy political and business issues (is feature x threatening to partner Fooinc, how can we hang ads on this, etc.)
3. Focus on fancy-pants analysis of numbers (data mining to try to optimise, rather than revolutionize), leading them to be blind to simple measures like using Javascript and caching lots of content in the client.
What other reasons are there?
Re:Quick review (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Quick review (Score:2, Interesting)
What WOULD you call Google's approach? (Score:5, Interesting)
It's not quite user-interface, in the sense of elegant widgets or consistency or any of that stuff. Google's traditional search features could almost run on Lynx on a green screen. Maybe they can. Google Maps is visually spiffy by comparison to Mapquest, but it's nothing we haven't seen in standalone programs years ago.
It isn't really "search." Or at least, if it is, with every new thing they roll out, Google does an amazing job of expanding my notion of what "search" means. What does it mean to "search" on "250 pounds in kilograms?"
Something that Google seems to share with Apple is some sort of courtesy or kindness or service orientation to the end-user. It just works. And unlike Microsoft or Apple, Google's services seem to come with fewer strings attached.
One of the things that delights me about Google is a certain kind of freshness I haven't seen elsewhere as often as I'd like. They have the characteristic you used to see in innovative software that when you describe the latest Google feature, it doesn't sound all that new, yet when you use it you get that feeling that something unexpected has been revealed.
Re:Why aren't competitors beating Google to market (Score:5, Interesting)
Where this is going... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Google + DOM = Mozilla Juggernaut (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Quick review (Score:1, Interesting)
Will this bother some Privacy Fanatics ? (Score:5, Interesting)
John Smith in New York City, NY [google.com]
Depending on how the results are categorized and obtained, this seems like it could be a hot issue.
Brandon Petersen
This might be intentional. (Score:2, Interesting)
Made from images? (Score:1, Interesting)
Doesn't comply with W3C-suggestions (Score:2, Interesting)
Google uses XUL (Score:3, Interesting)
Here's the big secret:
Google uses XUL to develop all their rich websites. For example: Gmail, Maps, Groups and others on the way. This natively XUL interface is then converted to HTML/CSS/JavaScript that we can see and run. This conversion is done by a program Google wrote a while ago and the conversion is very simple. Of course, it's not perfect and needs to be loked over by hand. This is how Gmail is compatible now with all the other browsers.
In the future, when they decide it is time, they will publish their XUL interfaces side-by-side with their current interfaces. I'm not trying to give any hints, but this is related to a large push that Google is going to make to support XUL technology and will happen by the end of this year or early 2006.
Re:Google uses XUL (Score:4, Interesting)
In addition to that, (Score:5, Interesting)
Another example of an excellent online map (Score:2, Interesting)
I want to point you to another example of an online map:
map.search.ch [search.ch]
This is Switzerland and not the US and it uses aerial photos with an overlay of vector street data. The resolution is amazingly good.
Furthermore:
For me it's one of the most fascinating applications of web/html/javascript technique.
It's not easy. (Score:2, Interesting)
You can easily convert PS or PDF to JPEG with ImageMagick (yes I'm a geek).
Re:Google + DOM = Mozilla Juggernaut (Score:4, Interesting)
Languages are important, but even more important is the runtime environment they have access to. If the environment has the basic stuff you need, then even a crappy language would be pretty powerful. Think of a templating language like velocity -- it's not designed to be powerful by itself, but to be very convenient to integrate with a context that supplies it with everything it needs to do powerful things.
Years ago, in the era of of the 16MHz microprocessor, I had the problem of writing an Exel spreadsheet that required lookups from huge tables. Using VLOOKUP took hours. So I implemented a double hash algorithm in the Excel macro language. Mind you, this wasn't VB for apps, this was the nasty old lotus-y macro language. It turned out to be easy, because the spreadsheet environment provided most of the lumber I needed, I just had to snap it together.
Re:JS / HTML graphics: iWon Prize Machine (Score:3, Interesting)
Really opened my eyes to the possibilities of what JavaScript/DOM can do. Glad to see Google, iWon, and other sites finally starting to make use of it.
Re:what about plotting waypoints on the map? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:what about plotting waypoints on the map? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:what about plotting waypoints on the map? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Old info (Score:2, Interesting)
http://map.search.ch/ rocks! (Score:3, Interesting)
Note that you can also check the "Strasseskarte" box to switch between the satellite view and the just-the-facts-ma'am road map view.
Cheers,
-j.