Firefox 1.0.1 Released 617
homeobocks writes "Firefox 1.0.1 has been officially released by the Mozilla Foundation, with some important security fixes. An announcement and release notes are available." Presumably this fixes the window injection vulnerabilities.
Yeeehaaa (but...) (Score:5, Insightful)
You can now make links opened by other applications open into a new tab, reuse an existing tab, or open a new window.
Does it play well with Tabbrowser extension?
Usually any app that does this kills off my saved session. (grrrr).
Here's hoping.
And, isn't msi support supposed to be available?
(if it is there I did not see it)
Re:Mirrors (Score:5, Insightful)
At least Micro$oft doesnt make you totally re-download IE everytime they patch it.
"Wow, what a fix." (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:IDN Problems Fixed? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Check Updates... (Score:2, Insightful)
Slashdot bug? (Score:2, Insightful)
Too bad it still doesn't fix the RAM problem (Score:2, Insightful)
Even the original Mozilla, which is bloated, uses a mere 20,482K to open slashdot.org, while it can open up my loads of e-mail only using 24,223K of RAM. Using Thunderbird in addition to Firefox, since they don't share the same instance of the Gecko rendering engine, causes another 28,292K of RAM to be used. Internet Explorer 6 even with SP2, on the other hand, only consumes about 3,840K of RAM to open up slashdot.org, and Outlook Express only consumes 2,248K.
I recall it even being worse on Linux due to the fact that it loads quite a large amount of libraries with it, that runs slowly under older machines even under Fluxbox or the ultra-minimalist evilwm.
Whatever Firefox does, it should have made it a priority before the 1.0 Release to clean up the amount of RAM it abuses to do what it does. Even after waiting months for 1.01, it seems to have gotten worse than I recall, and I haven't put it in debug mode or developer mode or anything -- I disabled anything like that in the Custom Installation.
But fortunately, I've got 1GB of RAM, and there's barely any spyware, so I'm ok with it now. I just wish I didn't have to put either Dillo for Linux or IE6 on Win98 for those old late Pentium Is / early Pentium IIs I fix up for people in my spare time, since Firefox is a nice browser despite its flaws. Too bad it won't run decently on anything less than a Pentium III with 256MB of RAM.
Re:Mirrors (Score:5, Insightful)
I guess they haven't put the updates on the server yet?
Screw it, I downloaded the whole thing and it took 20 seconds. I closed FF, Zipped up ProgFiles\MozFF and DocSet\User\AppDat\Moz, installed FF 1.0.1 and loaded it up.
Took less thAn 2 minutes to do all that, I'm updated and no extensions broke.
Pretty cool. Didn't even need a fricken reboot like IE would have.
Re:IDN Problems Fixed? (Score:1, Insightful)
Update button? (Score:2, Insightful)
Not that it's tough to manually download & install the update. It'd just be nice if I could tell my co-workers to "click on this button and it'll update itself."
New Download Count? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:What's new in 1.0.1 (Score:3, Insightful)
Please tell me to do it there's a more intuitive way to do that in the GUI.
Re:How can I find out? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I'm excited (Score:5, Insightful)
Remember that it's not just one geek-friendly browser we're talking about here - the future of the entire internet's at stake. The popularity of this one browser could be the only thing that prevents the web turning into a microsoft-dominated proprietary system a few years down the line, destroying any chance linux might have had on desktop machines.
And if that's not an exciting and important Slashdot story, I don't know what is.
Re:What's new in 1.0.1 (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Mirrors (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Be kind to the mirrors, use official bittorents (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Be kind to the mirrors, use official bittorents (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:IDN Problems Fixed? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:On this subject (Score:5, Insightful)
In fact, I come to the opposite conclusion: there was no noticable increase afterward.
Re:On this subject (Score:2, Insightful)
The internet appears to be wearing a massive pair of rose-tinted specticals. These are remarkable things that shield the wearer from any bad things that might be wrong with their favourite piece of software, that rescued them from the evil clutches of Micro$oft (lol) Internet Exploiter (lol).
As a result of this, it means that Firefox can't have any bugs. I mean, how can it? It's open source! Everyone knows that the instant someone discovers a bug in any open-source software, the magical bug evles emerge from the woodwork and fix it instantly, and upgrade everyone's copies for them.
Unfortuantely, when you take the specs off, you see that the open-source model doesn't really work that way, and that software as monumentally complex and widespread as firefox can't just shoot out new point-releases every week and expect everyone to keep up to date.
Re:A few bugs in this release (Score:1, Insightful)
This is a major security flaw - the fact that Firefox is so fucking hard to upgrade (and upgrades break any themes and extensions you were using) means that a lot of people are going to get fed up and stick with their current version, holes or no holes. And Firefox users will get 0wn3d and Firefox will look bad.
For fuck's sake, guys, I'll even put up with a reboot, if you can just Get. Firefox. Upgrading. EASILY!
Upgrade? (Score:2, Insightful)
"Prior to installing Firefox 1.0.1, please ensure that the directory you've chosen to install into is clean and doesn't contain any previous Firefox installations."
So why do I want to uninstall my old version prior to installing a new version? Can they not handle a simple upgrade?
(Seriously, I'm asking a question. I like Firefox, so this isn't flaimbait.)
Re:Mirrors (Score:1, Insightful)