Nero Burning for Linux 599
ceasol writes "The German company Nero, developers of the award-winning Nero Burning ROM suite for Windows, now release a free version for Linux called NeroLINUX a CD/DVD Burning Software, and include many features from the Windows version. This software is proprietary but free if you registered." The OEM versions of Nero that come with many CD burners aren't sufficient, though; NeroLINUX is free-as-in-beer only if you've registered "a full version of Nero software version 6 or higher," or a "retail version or downloaded version."
Good thing (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Advantages of Nero? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:No ISO support ... (Score:2, Informative)
(My experience is relevant to Nero v5. YMMV.)
I, and I imagine most people, would find the "Image Writer", a virtual CD-R that you can use to make only Nero images (.nra). You can do all the things you can do with any other CD-R drive with that, burn a "disc", copy a disc, etc. It only supports
There is, however, a menu-item, "Save Track", that will let you save ISO images, utilizing one of the most confusing and hackneyed file chooser ever.
Nero does support burning from ISOs in the same fashion as
Re:uhh who cares? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Nero would have better spent their time and $$$ (Score:3, Informative)
Re:What? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:What? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Warning: Proprietary DRM (Score:4, Informative)
If you look at the very first paragraph you will notice a list of software products that it covers, NeroLinux is *NOT* one of pieces of software covered by that license, making your whole point irrelevant to the discussion on NeroLinux (this does not mean I support the DRM in the windows version).
NeroLinux - Good for weaning windows Nero users (Score:3, Informative)
Definitely a good tool for those who have vid burning windows addicts in their household. I may finally have a shot at converting my wife over to the 'dark side' of burning vids on her windows station...time to switch the myth server inittab to default:5.
Ah...but this is slashdot...nitpicking(TM) is mandatory. Well, it'd be nice if the Nero folks provided at least a basic level of support for the linux side. I'd bet there's people in their support arm who'd be happy to work with an OS they can really troubleshoot for a change.
Re:The company (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Motif Garbage (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Good thing (Score:3, Informative)
Re:I know this is Slashdot ... (Score:5, Informative)
Look at the bottom of http://www.nero.com/ [nero.com]. "Nero AG / Nero Inc." I'm guessing they incorporated under the Nero name as well when they realized that not many people actually know the company name.
Fair enough (Score:3, Informative)
Great little program. UI needs just a little streamlining, but still is pretty good. And it wraps all the wonderfully powerful command line tools
Re:I know this is Slashdot ... (Score:1, Informative)
These idiots! They do not know their own name!
http://www.nero.com/en/About_Nero.html
Ahead is dead, long live Nero!
Re:Nero would have better spent their time and $$$ (Score:1, Informative)
Re:It's pointless (Score:3, Informative)
Just having the menus in the same place would have value with a common clerical staff attitude of not wanting to learn anything unless they are paid to go on a course. Sit them in front of a desktop with icons for mozilla/netscape, openoffice and Nero and it often won't matter to them what the OS is.
K3B is very nice, but really brings home the limitations of the usual win32 single desktop screen when you bring it up on a windows desktop via X. There are so many windows that pop up - while since Nero came from the win32 background it would probably look saner across the network to the average secretary.
stuff you can't do with Linux burning software (Score:3, Informative)
I also think it's pretty damn cool that despite all of the cool front-ends out there, basically just a handful of the same utilities are used.
I can think of a few things that the current linux combos of those utils can't accomplish, however, at least the last time I looked into each one:
Comment removed (Score:4, Informative)
Nero ALREADY runs on linux (Score:3, Informative)
HERE [linuxcompatible.org]
Re:How serious are they really? (Score:2, Informative)
And they can tell if you're going to use the Linux part of it - remember, you have to register on their website to get their Linux version, so they probably count people who do so.
Re:Nero ALREADY runs on linux (Score:2, Informative)
I expect that it is very stable.
The main nero application does three things:
1) Basic GUI user interaction
2) Read files
3) Compose ATAPI CDB's and send them to the burner
The first two are dead simple, it isn't like Nero's doing any Direct3D rendering, wine's had that level of functionality for years. The third is as close to talking to the raw hardware as you can get, it probably uses Linux's scsi pass-thru driver, thus by-passing the kernel for 99% of the work.
Re:But can it compete? (Score:4, Informative)
Here's one out of three... NeroLinux Screenshots [nero.com]
Bob
Certifications... (Score:3, Informative)
Otherwise, the Aplus cert has some Linux troubleshooting now, and can (at least) be applied to more aspects of what you're doing (one of the few certs that I don't feel is a waste of time).
I am an IT director and a Linux user (currently Fedora Core 3 and RedHat Enterprise Linux 4).