Ultaportable Apps: Take Your Thumbware Anywhere 279
museumpeace writes "On his blog, Jeremy Wagstaff makes available a list of the apps now packaged for USB thumbdrives. He also wrote these up in WSJ but that will cost you. My personal favorite is the FireFox in a box...every where I went, I had a different crop of bookmarks, now my browsing is the same wherever
I go."
spelunking cheque (Score:4, Insightful)
i do this anyway... (Score:2, Insightful)
Portable firefox? (Score:2, Insightful)
Uh huh... (Score:5, Insightful)
Then I don't have to carry around all those apps. I just ssh to my machine that does.
How big are these apps? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I know an Ultaportable App (Score:3, Insightful)
I do government contract work, and correspond with all sorts of bigshot muckety-mucks from cities across the US, from city IT managers to police and fire chiefs, mayors, judges and city attorneys.
Coming from a Canadian living in the US: It's downright sad that Americans are not taught to read or write, and lack basic communication skills. Or maybe they're taught, and forget, because the general culture doesn't place any importance on proper use of language. After all, deriding someone for using slang isn't "PC".
I shouldn't have to recieve an email, only to play phone-tag all day to find out what the fuck they're talking about.
This one particular dork tries to make everything read more "official" by Capitalizing Every Word In Every Sentence.
Gah, beurocrats. All they do is have meetings and set up phone conferences all day.
Re:Thest are great... except - the only problem is (Score:5, Insightful)
She did the right thing, good for her.
She'd be a real moron if she let anybody come in, attach a rewritable drive to her business computer, run executables from it, then let you have your drive back.
You should be happy she made that choice.
flash is cheap (Score:5, Insightful)
With USB thumb drives costing about or less than $50 for 512MB, I'd have to say that space isn't much of an issue at all. I've seen 1GB flash drives for under $70 (though $90-100 is somewhat more common).
What is more of an issue to me is that the application not go bonkers with write cycles being somewhat precious with flash memory. It would be nice if the various linux filesystem drivers could have a mount option that spread out writes (since fragmentation isn't much of an issue on a media with essentially no seek time).
Shouldn't this be how all software is designed? (Score:5, Insightful)
Isn't this how all software should be released?
that's the way it used to work (Score:4, Insightful)
With modern PCs, you have to think seriously about whether this is a good idea, though. Unless you actually boot from the thumb drive, you risk exposing your data to viruses and spyware.
Re:Security (Score:2, Insightful)
So why haven't they simply made the gateway route all 80 and 443 traffic through the proxy? No need to configure any clients.
How long before viruses exploit this? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sure McAfee, Symantec, and Sophos will all love this idea, but I think I'll take a pass here...
Re:I know an Ultaportable App (Score:2, Insightful)
The other thing is that whilst no one should be expected to spend half an hour carefully double checking every slashdot post for errors, they also shouldn't _need_ to.
Average spelling and grammar abilities should be high enough that someone can quickly spew something out, and be relatively certain that it makes sense, and is spelt right _without_ the use of spell checkers or anything more than a quick read through.
Re:This is EXACTLY what my site is all about... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:How long before viruses exploit this? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:I know an Ultaportable App (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:I know an Ultaportable App (Score:2, Insightful)
BTW the majority of words added to old English, to form modern English, come from French. Some have just been around longer.
And what is a "layperson" in this context? Do we have a special priest class that is expected to be able to write the language while the rest of us scratch down whatever we want?
Library updates are BS for 99% of Windows apps (Score:3, Insightful)
I can only think of two instances when you might update just the libraries for an application:
1) Windows OS. Libraries make sense here, but it's not like any service pack has ever been just DLLs or there's some expectation they'll be small. IMHO the OS libraries are the only place that sharing makes sense.
2) Large applications (think SQL server, Exchange, etc). Modularity makes sense here from a scale perspective, since updating a static Exchange install would be pretty painful. But again, it's not like E2k service packs have been small, either.
The "critical security fix" usually applies to OS-supplied libraries and moreso on the UNIX side when holes have been found in stuff like ssh or other crypto libraries linked all over the place.
But this is why I said "make it an option" -- if I want to install a statically linked/private library application, I should have the choice.