Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Software Data Storage Portables Hardware

Ultaportable Apps: Take Your Thumbware Anywhere 279

museumpeace writes "On his blog, Jeremy Wagstaff makes available a list of the apps now packaged for USB thumbdrives. He also wrote these up in WSJ but that will cost you. My personal favorite is the FireFox in a box...every where I went, I had a different crop of bookmarks, now my browsing is the same wherever I go."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Ultaportable Apps: Take Your Thumbware Anywhere

Comments Filter:
  • by philo_enyce ( 792695 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @06:34PM (#12005093)
    i just have a wiki where my bookmarks live. anywhere i go, i open to that page and voila, my bookmarks. since it's a wiki, i can add pages to it from anywhere. no fuss no muss and no cost. philo
  • Like many Slashdoters, I often get asked to look at a friend or family memeber's computer to fix a small problem, remove a virus, or install a new piece of hardware. Want I want more than consistent applications is a way to take my OS and application configuration/preferences with me between machines. Nothing is worse than sitting down at a computer with the default Windows XP configuration still being used.
  • by Buzz_Litebeer ( 539463 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @06:35PM (#12005108) Journal
    Is there a media player that can be ported with all of its codecs?

    When I move from machine to machine, I usually install the codec packs and then run mplayer off of the USB drive for the media off of it. If there was a media player where I could avoid the hassle of installing the codecs for the media that would be great!

    I also found that winamp runs as a good media player to port around on machines as well. Some small ftp programs like ftp explorer work without needing installation, and i always keep a cd cracked version of some of my older games (such as quake 3 and pre-steam half life1) on my USB drive as well.

    (pocket sized 40 gig USB).

  • Re:Portable firefox? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by sh00z ( 206503 ) <.sh00z. .at. .yahoo.com.> on Monday March 21, 2005 @06:36PM (#12005122) Journal
    I'm with you. I was hoping that I could use this "portable" function to move a USB keychain between my Powerbook, my wife's XP machine, and a Linux box. It does not appear to support multiple platforms. As it sits now, I'm much better off with the set of Applescripts that I use to push/pull bookmark files in order to synchronize them manually. If I got energetic enough to make the script ignore the "last viewed" part of the differences between these files, I could do a multi-sync every night over TCP/IP.
  • Portable Firefox (Score:4, Interesting)

    by AbRASiON ( 589899 ) * on Monday March 21, 2005 @06:48PM (#12005268) Journal
    Hooray I can be on topic for a change....

    As a portable firefox user, I've got to say I'm generally quite happy with the package.
    It seems a little quirky I must admit like this problem.

    Although this seems illogical, I've found installing some extensions don't work the first or second time, even though the instructions outline doing it "twice" should do it - it seems to not like the "delay" of working with a USB disk.

    Now the solution I've found is to copy portable firefox to the local disk, which is obviously quicker and then set it up exactly how you like it (be sure to edit the portable firefox.ini file to set the path) - once you've set it up how you like it, copy it back to the usb drive.

    Also the bookmark code within ffox does a lot of read / writes when doing ANYTHING with them - so it's tremendously slow, again I'd recommend doing it all on a local disk then copying back when it's finally setup how you like it.

    It also doesn't remember cookies (obviously)
    However for the love of god I'd like to be able to say setup cookies just for a couple of sites :( - it does remember passwords but some sites remember a heck of a lot of stuff with the cookies - if I could just make it remmeber cookies for say my top 30 sites I hit, it would be so much handier.

  • by Performaman ( 735106 ) <Peterjones@@@gmail...com> on Monday March 21, 2005 @06:53PM (#12005333)
    I still do, and it's damned convenient. No logged passwords (except for the VNC one) or browser caches on school machines.
    Can't catch me, I use VNC!
  • Re:Uh huh... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by stratjakt ( 596332 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @06:53PM (#12005341) Journal
    Until you're behind a firewall that won't let you through, which I was all last week.

    It was ridiculous, I was working at this cities administration building, and they provide (in tandem with the local university) free wifi outside, which won't penetrate through the walls.

    I had to keep running outside to connect to my home office' vpn, to get to the stuff I needed, as I too, am one of those "I can do it all remotely" types.

    Lesson learned, next time I pack it all up to take with me. Of course, in my case, that means a portable 80 gig drive, since I couldn't fit all our stuff on flash.
  • Re:Portable firefox? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Bios_Hakr ( 68586 ) <xptical@g3.14mail.com minus pi> on Monday March 21, 2005 @06:57PM (#12005384)
    Not really. The problem is that many people don't have access to the "admin" account. You can't really install apps (you can "install" them to your desktop and hope an admin doesn't get notified), and can't change any settings. Lots of admins have draconian disk quota policies.

    Firefox can be unzipped to a folder. Another folder can act as the profile. You need .bat file to tell it to start and use that profile vice creating one under "Documents and Settings/$user/whatever/". After that, removing disk-caching and boosting the memory cache helps out. Add a shortcut to the desktop of the client pointing to the .bat file on the thumb drive and you are set.

    VLC 0.8.1 works great from a thumb drive and plays just about anything you throw at it. When my coworkers curse the admin for not having $codec, they come see me.

    WinRAR works perfectly once "installed" to a thumb drive. All you need to do on the client is choose "Open With..." and browse to find winrar.exe on the thumbdrive.

    I also have cygwin on my thumbdrive to show off the power of command-line completion to my peers. Plus it always comes in handy for various tasks.

    I keep several documents on there too. A current copy of my resume, a list of sites and passwords, some random pr0n, helpful regedits, PHP books in .pdf, basic drivers for my NICs, and pics of my kids.

    BTW, banish the thought that pics of my kids and pr0n might be one and the same...they aren't.

    We also keep USB keys in the safe with server passwords and configs, router passwords and configs, VPN clients, Sniffer Pro, and anything else the NOC guys ask for. They can literally take the key to any site and turn any laptop into a network config workstation.

    It's amazing some of the random shit we find on there when they sign them back in.

    Anyway, having tons of apps run from removable media is highly desired in my environment. The ammount of work some guys put into hacking these things to get $fav_app working from them is mind-numbing. To have someone else come up with a "certified" list could save tons of time.
  • My set: (Score:2, Interesting)

    by PAPPP ( 546666 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @07:15PM (#12005593) Homepage
    I very heavily use my thumb drive on school/library pubic systems, and have an allmost entirely different set of programs i use:
    For AIM:
    TerrAIM [sourceforge.net] ,sure its ugly, but it works a lot better than miranda
    For IRC:
    Dana [diebestenbits.de] I acutally use this little IRC client whenever im in windows, even on my own machines. very light and fast.
    For Remote:
    Both RealVNC [realvnc.com] and PuTTY [greenend.org.uk]
    My favorive text editor:
    Notepad++ [sourceforge.net]
    And a number of tools from DS Software [ozemail.com.au] Notably TaskKill.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 21, 2005 @07:29PM (#12005776)
    pkt can do it. try pkt.sf.net
    you will need to decrypt before running tho.
  • OS X (Score:4, Interesting)

    by drdink ( 77 ) * <smkelly+slashdot@zombie.org> on Monday March 21, 2005 @07:40PM (#12005940) Homepage
    This is one of the things I've come to like about Mac OS X. Most good applications are nothing but a single icon. This icon is represented by a single directory. If you drag this directory to a USB drive (and it fits), then it will run from that drive. Installing these sorts of applications consists of dragging them from an archive or disk image and dropping them into your folder of choice. I really wish more OS X applications were like this. Uninstalling is great. You just throw them away.
  • by jbn-o ( 555068 ) <mail@digitalcitizen.info> on Monday March 21, 2005 @08:00PM (#12006158) Homepage

    There are some caveats to publishing one's bookmarks or participating in collaborative bookmarking which less technical users might not catch at first glance: you probably don't want to publish anything about your browsing if you bookmark:

    • links to sensitive materials
    • subjective and revealing title of bookmark (a bookmark called "Here's where John Smith lied to me about Jane" which points to a post on an e-mail list mirror)
    • saved copies of a document in the bookmark tree (so if the browser can't reach the URL, it shows the saved webpage archive file instead)
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday March 21, 2005 @08:20PM (#12006325)
    i just have a wiki where my bookmarks live. anywhere i go,

    When you use that wiki on an office or public or school network or WiFi connection, do you always use SSL (HTTPS)? If not, I'll thank you in advance for your login and password to that wiki.

    Of course, you will have edit history of what I shall do to your wiki. Revert! Revert!
  • by omahajim ( 723760 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @08:42PM (#12006497)
    Any specific evidence from anyone on the wear and tear on flash drives, that thousands of read/write cycles can inflict? Anytime I've read elsewhere about people running applications off USB drives, someone has mentioned r/w cycles. Anyone have a drive fail from this?
  • by iambowie ( 869691 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @08:49PM (#12006559)
    I'm familiar with this site. The creator is definitely on the right track. However, there are a number of live CDs that have not been listed (which are listed here: http://www.frozentech.com/content/livecd.php). We could all benefit from increased activity on this site. If you have anything to contribute, please follow the original poster's link.
  • by swb ( 14022 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @09:23PM (#12006904)
    No. You do this, and you'll have about 157 copies of the same .dll's on your system.

    Who fucking cares? Storage is $0.50 per gig, so I blow a couple of gig on duplicated libraries. Can't I at least get the choice of a "static" install that doesn't rely on shared libraries?

    Most people never rebuild the own Windows DLLs, so the "dynamic update" argument for shared libraries seldom holds water for applications in that environment, and the loss of storage is meaningless in today's hard disks.

    At least build the installers (or the Makefiles) such that a statically linked installation is at least a *choice*.
  • Re:flash is cheap (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Fweeky ( 41046 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @09:54PM (#12007157) Homepage
    "It would be nice if the various linux filesystem drivers could have a mount option that spread out writes"

    Flash drives already do load leveling in hardware; they are after all, usually used with FAT.

    For the few cases where you need to do it yourself, that's what JFFS2 [sourceware.org] is for.
  • by k8to ( 9046 ) on Monday March 21, 2005 @10:03PM (#12007268) Homepage
    OH HORROR!

    You'll be able to put.. TEXT... on his wiki!

    Note: edit access to wikis is not really a problem. The only attack form that really matters is targetted robot attacks for example from spammers. These are generally blocked by subnet range exclusion, and are nothing but another form of DOS eventually, like pingflooding.

    If someone edits your wiki and puts text on it, you can just go back to the last version or any other earlier version if you don't like their changes.

There are two ways to write error-free programs; only the third one works.

Working...