CaminoBrowser.org Launches 126
Samuel Sidler writes "Introducing CaminoBrowser.org, the new Camino project site. The pages have been completely revamped with up-to-date information, useful and easy-to-read support pages, and, of course, pretty pictures. Months of effort have gone into creating a truly excellent site. While the product pages will remain hosted at mozilla.org, our new website will be the home of the project and all support/development information as well as up-to-date news and information."
Ok, we have clones (Score:5, Insightful)
That's one aspect of a web browser, there's dozens more. I kinda feel like tabs are the last real innovation for web browsers. Kinda like cup holders in cinemas. Guess I should be greatful it didn't take 30 years.
Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)
Firefox doesn't cut it (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Why? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Camino's neat, but... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Ok, we have clones (Score:5, Insightful)
An easy solution is to flip the history ahead of the current position and insert it before current when the user chooses a new site.
ie (where '-' is current position and the user has come back to site c from site a)
a
b
c-
d
e
when the user clicks on new site f becomes
f-
c
b
a
d
e
because the user just came to c back through b and a, so to them a and b are behind them now.
Rather than starting it again with
f-
c
As Safari does. Perhaps there are other orderings that make more sense - it'd be interesting to see how a lot of people use history, and how the current ones frustrate them - you don't have a link for that paper do you?
Re:Ok, we have clones (Score:2, Insightful)
Cheers!
Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)
MacOS X has two native API's - carbon [apple.com] and cocoa [apple.com]. Carbon hardly has any virtues of its own, it's main advantage is that its relatively easy to port old, non-Unix Mac applications to Carbon, so whenever anyone has any project that has its roots still in last century, he sticks with Carbon. This is not just the case of various Mozilla-derivative projects but also of - say - Microsoft Office for MacOS. Cocoa is the "native native" API and here's where MacOS X really shines. If you use MacOS X a lot, you tend to hate Carbon and favor Cocoa because Cocoa apps offer much better overall integration with systemwide services, such as your favorite spellchecker, they generally run faster and consume less resources. Camino is Cocoa, Firefox is Carbon.
Re:Ok, we have clones (Score:4, Insightful)