Behind the Scenes At Google 196
An anonymous reader writes "University of Wahington TV Presents "behind the Scenes With Google." From the site: 'Search is one of the most important applications used on the internet and poses some of the most interesting challenges in computer science. Providing high-quality search requires understanding across a wide range of computer science disciplines. In this program, Jeff Dean of Google describes some of these challenges, discusses applications Google has developed, and highlights systems they've built, including GFS, a large-scale distributed file system, and MapReduce, a library for automatic parallelization and distribution of large-scale computation. He also shares some interesting observations derived from Google's web data.' "
Fsking video format. (Score:2, Insightful)
G4/TechTV (Score:2, Insightful)
GFS (Score:2, Insightful)
It's quite nice to see a large corporation make a contribution to Open Source, especially in such a "R&D-esque" field as supercomputing.
Who said that Open Source only rehashes existing technologies and never does anything new?
Re:Google & Backup (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Fsking video format. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:want real dirt? go to www.fuckedgoogle.com (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I use Google at work (Score:5, Insightful)
b) Use a different anonymizing proxy for _each_ single search, preferably using SSL.
c) Assume your searches AND non-encrypted web requests aren't anonymous and secure.
If I were running the NSA or some other spook agency, I'd tap the pipes leading to Google (and a few other sites too).
Same if I were a dubious org/agency.
Lots of finance institutions/orgs/ppl get the bulk of their info from just a few sources e.g. Bloomberg. So if Bloomberg gets/sends the bulk of their info down just a few pipes...
Dirt? That more like modelling clay (Score:4, Insightful)
Think about it, if someone really hated any of the Fortune 500 companies and bothered to dig up some dirt, there'd be tons more dirt.
I suppose Google is a young company. Give it a few more years and more parasites would have found their way into Google. Then you'd have a lot more dirt.
Re:Fsking video format. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:want real dirt? go to www.fuckedgoogle.com (Score:3, Insightful)
Just like Slashdot then? Except this fuckedgoogle site has the opposite viewpoint. How is it OK to be biased in one direction, but not the other? Why is it that some people on this site seem to have a vested interest in quashing any criticism of their favourite giant corporation? What have you got to hide?
Re:mediocre or no Linux support! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:GFS (Score:4, Insightful)
Considering that it's in vogue to name file systems with one letter in front of "FS"? About 1 in 26. The odds are even better if you discount commonly used file systems such as XFS, UFS, FFS, NFS, and JFS.
Re:G4/TechTV (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:50% female is the goal (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Dirt? That more like modelling clay (Score:3, Insightful)
So either put up (evidence) or shut up.
Re:G4/TechTV (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:G4/TechTV (Score:1, Insightful)