NNSA Supercomputer Breaks Computing Record 266
Lecutis writes "National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) Administrator Linton F. Brooks announced that on March 23, 2005, a supercomputer developed through the Advanced Simulation and Computing program for NNSAs Stockpile Stewardship efforts has performed 135.3 trillion floating point operations per second (teraFLOP/s) on the industry standard LINPACK benchmark, making it the fastest supercomputer in the world."
Neat (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:From the press release... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:hmmmmm... (Score:5, Interesting)
I know its not 3.2billion because most micro operations take at least 3 or 4 clock cycles.
Re:Neat (Score:3, Interesting)
Just goes to show that Moore's law won't hold forever.
LINPACK usage? (Score:2, Interesting)
Human Intelligence? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Human Intelligence? (Score:5, Interesting)
One would say this supercomputer is already more than twice as smart as Data!
Re:Wow! (Score:3, Interesting)
Human Intelligence is More than Speed (Score:2, Interesting)
Estimates are that the Human brain computes somewhere between 100 Teraflops and 1000 Teraflops [google.ca],
and Google was performing somewhere between 100 and 300 Teraflops [tnl.net]. in late 2004.
P.S. Since doing that bit of research, every time Google checks my spelling and responds with "did you mean..." the hair stands on the back of my neck :)
But it's more than processing speed. It needs to have the software to do things like decision making, analysis, reasoning, evaluating, judging, information-organizing, learning, logic etc. which would normally require a human to perform.
We're not far off though...
DOE's Senior Activity Center (Score:3, Interesting)
Remember, everything in the inventory was designed with far less compute power than today's desktops.
NSA has something better (Score:1, Interesting)
This was back in 2001.
I really have a strong feeling the NSA is still ahead of NASA on this one, but they don't publish information about their clusters... for obvious reasons.
Re:Neat (Score:4, Interesting)
Linpack is VERY easy to parallize. Earth simulator and other vector machines get over 85% of their theoretical processing power with linpack, and even clusters with relatively abyssmal interconnects are still in the 50% range.
Lots of computational problems need orders of magnitutes more inter-node communication, up to the point where linpack doesnt even matter anymore and clusters and vector computers with the same linpack score are a factor of 10 or 20 apart.
Finally Beat SETI@Home (Score:2, Interesting)
I'm currently running Folding@Home...