Firefox-Based Start-Up Gets Off The Ground 291
rudy_wayne writes "ZDNet is reporting that a new version of the Firefox Web browser is coming your way, but not from the Mozilla Foundation. 'When we launch our own services, in about a month or so, we'll be looking to offer the must-have companion to Firefox,' said Bart Decrem, Round Two CEO and a former staffer at the Mozilla Foundation. 'We see tremendous room for innovating on top of the Mozilla and Firefox platform, and we see ourselves as the first company outside of the nonprofit Mozilla Foundation that's fully dedicated to serving Firefox users.'
Round Two planned a corporate launch Monday night with the promise of bringing 'a new crop of products and services that will enhance your Firefox experience.'"
Re:Want to bet? (Score:5, Informative)
Start Up - Shut Down (Score:3, Informative)
right... so in summary, (Score:2, Informative)
I know I'm not paying for any of those.
Chicken Shit (was Re:Want to bet?) (Score:2, Informative)
Re:right... so in summary, (Score:5, Informative)
Right, except you only copied/pasted the part that you wanted to. The quote is actually talking about how they are sponsoring those projects, providing servers, bandwidth, and money.
(Emphasis mine.) They're also supporting (again, from TFA):
They're also developing their own extensions (which presumably you can buy):
Now, whether that (and possibly other future products) is useful, sure, let's debate that. But don't read the article and completely misrepresent what's written.
Re:right... so in summary, (Score:1, Informative)
While Round Two--formerly known as MozSource--puts the finishing touches on its own products, the company is sponsoring development of several other Firefox extensions
Funny, the entire article simply doesn't say what this miraculous "must-have companion" is... simply that they are sponsoring several other extensions while we wait with baited breath... worst... journalism... ever...
About Bart Decrem (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Uh yeah (Score:3, Informative)
I still run Mosaic on my NeXT machine...
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:5, Informative)
The Mozilla license (MPL [opensource.org]) requires availability and redistributability of source code (BSD licenses do not). It seems legal, though, with a program under the LGPL or MPL, to create and not provide source for add-ons which can run with unmodified binaries (or modified binaries with source code available).
Re:Where's the content? - Its there, but "hidden" (Score:2, Informative)
Mozilla development ecosystem. While Round Two--formerly known as MozSource--puts the finishing touches on its own products, the company is sponsoring development of several other Firefox extensions.
Ok, what do we have here? Aight, a companys name, even two since it has renamed itself..
These include FlashGot, which lets Firefox work with third-party download managers; Bandwidth Tester, which lets people determine their connection speed; and SwitchProxy, which lets people surf anonymously with Firefox by configuring Firefox to work with multiple Web proxy servers
Yay! Products!!!111!11!
Round Two also said it was supporting StockTicker, TinyURL Creator, Copy Plain Text, Extension Uninstaller, Lorem Ipsum Content Generator, OpenDownload, Open Long URLs, Search Plugins and Secure Password Generator.
w00t? Even more of them! o_O
As for Round Two's own extensions, Decrem said the company was considering antivirus software to integrate with Firefox.
Oops? Future Plans omgwtfbbq!
So, ask again where the content is
And, to give you some more reading...
http://www.google.com/search?q=MozSource
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:5, Informative)
> firefox will be more of a force.
You can:
http://hemiolapei.free.fr/divers/tabmix/tabmix.ht
Bookmark Synchronization (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:2, Informative)
Another (too difficult) approach would be to have your Mozilla preferences/bookmarks on an NFS , SMB or other network-mounted partition.
Re:Where's the content? (Score:5, Informative)
While I don't see how they can make money off this either, anybody making money off something like Firefox sounds like not a bad idea. I'll be watching. All the best!
RoundTwo is not for geeks! (Score:5, Informative)
Folks, from what I have read on their site, RoundTwo is not appealing to geeks. They're not trying to force geeks to pay for stuff that they can get themselves, i.e. extensions and support and the like. I get the impression that they are offering extension support and bundling for corporations which want to adopt Firefox but also want a centralized entity that they can moan at when it doesn't work.
Their stance of 'adopting' extensions and providing infrastructure for the developers to leverage for that purpose is genius, IMO - it gives the extension authors the resources to improve and maintain their extensions, and it gives RoundTwo a direct line to the authors, which makes it far easier to get the author's attention if something is broken, which is critical if they really intend on creating Firefox 'distributions' with extensions bundled in, like what bdeonline is doing with Black Diamond Firefox [mozdev.org].
Sure, they've got the usual amount of marketing jargon out there right now, but considering that they've been supporting Mozilla software [mozsource.com] for a while now, I suspect that this is going to be the core of their business model.
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:3, Informative)
Remember - Netscape used to have an AIM component; I'm pretty sure they made sure they won't need to sue themselves...
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:3, Informative)
So yes, it's certainly possible to build a business this way. Hard but possible.
Re:How to make money off of Firefox (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Open Source Competition (Score:2, Informative)
However the code is completely seperate from Firefox.