XGI, VIA Release Open Source Drivers 315
An anonymous reader writes "XGI has announced the release of open source drivers for its Volari family of graphics adapters. Efforts at X.Org to merge the new code into the head branch are already underway. Almost simultaneously, VIA has announced the immediate release of open source drivers for S3 Graphics UniChrome, VIA ProSavage and ProSavage DDR. Could these moves signal the beginning of a period of rapid improvement in Free drivers for video cards?"
What do they have to lose? (Score:5, Insightful)
Well . . . (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:What do they have to lose? (Score:5, Insightful)
Hopefully this will result in an improvement in the drivers and a detectable increase in sales for this hardware.
Could be (Score:4, Insightful)
Could these moves signal the beginning of a period of rapid improvement in Free drivers for video cards?
Only if nVidia and/or ATI follow suit. (I know that in some cases they can't, but they could take an approach like Netscape and Sun did, release everything you do own and leave out the stuff you don't).
just a nit (Score:2, Insightful)
Does anyone here consider the head to be a branch? IMHO a branch is taken from the head. The head is just a trunk. Not a branch.
moderate root as 'troll' (Score:1, Insightful)
But they paid you to post what they did, didn't they?
Huh?
Desparate times...SUE ME! (Score:1, Insightful)
And of course we ONLY have their word that that's the real reason.* Sounds like the same reason they used for the nForce ethernet driver...until someone reverse-engineered it. Then they suddenly became all helpful.
*Security (from us) through obscurity.
Re:Hopefully.. (Score:4, Insightful)
Sorry, but the XGI announcement is a half-truth (Score:3, Insightful)
This sucks, too, because the performance of the XGI Volari V8 is comparable to a Radeon 9600 or Geforce 5700. And I'm sure that their drivers suck, so there's probably more performance in them. And it's dirt cheap, too. A 256MB card comes in at just under $100, and a 128MB card at $85.
XGI needs to be told that this isn't enough.
Re:What do they have to lose? (Score:5, Insightful)
The impact is that they will likely see a noticable improvement in sales because of this. And as far as their IP, nobody can even come close to nVidia and ATI. You only have to worry about your IP if you are concerned about the people behind you catching up. If you ARE in last place, you have nothing to loose
lets hope nVidia and ATI follow suit (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Hopefully.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:C3 systems (Score:4, Insightful)
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?d
Moreover, VeXP isn't fully functional. It has issues with full screen play, other video codecs, etc. If you want to do something besides watch mpeg2, you need the open source solution.
However, building mplayer, xorg, and unichrome to all play nice and use hardware took me several hours and a lot of curse words. It isn't exactly straightforward. (But maybe it improved from feb 2005.)
drivers are rarely done 100% in-house (Score:5, Insightful)
This is not completely fair. Most hardware companies depend on code in their drivers that their staff did not write. As contracts generally go, the outside developer usually imposes limits on use and distribution of their work. It's invariably more expensive to purchase outsourced code without restrictions.