Free Software Mag Interviews Sys-Con Publisher 279
NW writes "Tony Mobily, editor of the Free Software Magazine recently interviewed Fuat Kircaali, founder and publisher of Sys-Con Media. The interview revolves around the recent controversy surrounding the article written by Maureen O'Gara attacking Pamela Jones of GrokLaw."
The Credibility of Groklaw (Score:5, Funny)
In the event of such a conspiracy, I today announce my new cut-rate prices of my credibility.
For $20, I will state in any highly moderated slashdot comment that Groklaw may not be entirely correct and all sides of the issue must be looked at.
For $40, I will embed subliminal messages into comments stating that Groklaw is evil and SCO is good.
For $80, I will crapflood articles with SCO propaganda.
and for $699, I will state that I too have purchased linux liscences for my company so we don't have to worry about the legal liabilities and also, Groklaw sucks.
All Prices USD, effective date 13 Friday 2005.
Re:The Credibility of Groklaw (Score:2)
Why is everything a conspiracy around here? MS funded SCO's bullshit lawsuit. SCO is funding this crazy lady's attack on our precious PJ. Much as slashdot might want it to be so, the world isn't out to get open source and everything slashgeeks hold near and dear.
Re:The Credibility of Groklaw (Score:3, Informative)
Because, moron, MS DID fund SCO's bullshit lawsuit, albeit in a roundabout way (which is exactly the way these things are done.)
And given that Darl McBride has made a point of attacking PJ and suggesting she was "not who she seems to be", and given that O'Gara had access to SCo documents unseen by anybody else, it is hardly beyond the realm of possibility that she is indeed an SCO shill and either on direct or indirect orders or on her own decided to pull this stunt.
Which makes you an innocent moron...
I'
Re:The Credibility of Groklaw (Score:5, Interesting)
Pointing out the differences between MoG's story and the actual facts is throwing a punch?
including its censorship policy
Whether you agree with them or not, Groklaw's posting policies seem completely clear, at least to me. I've never had any trouble abiding by them, and I post often (under a different name).
Groklaw community regularly attacked MoG in the most vicious and personal terms.
Private individuals posting to a website can freely express their disgust at the actions of a reporter. Perhaps you are new to trolling on slashdot?
If someone was anonymously running a web site attacking me, I sure would want to find out who was behind it.
Even if you did know who was behind a website, you have no need to publish their personal details.
I find it interesting that MoG can't argue any actual facts or issues. She can only resort to personal attacks. MoG doesn't refute PJ's arguments, she just publishes the personal address of PJ's 80+ year old mom, right before Mother's Day, an elderly woman who has no connection to the running of Groklaw; nor does PJ's brother. What do these personal details have to do with the problems in MoG's stories?
If MoG didn't want someone "attacking" her by pointing out the blindingly obvious problems in her earlier stories, maybe she should do some real journalism?
Re:The Credibility of Groklaw (Score:2)
Said the anonymous coward while web posting several attacks on Groklaw.
Re:The Credibility of Groklaw (Score:2)
Since GrokLaw's function is to cover the SCO case from the legal angle, saying that it's credibility is diminished by any other issue is a red herring and misleading.
Saying that PJ "threw the first punch" by analyzing and refuting MoG's bullshit is just plain stupid.
Finally, if an anonymous person is attacking me, sure, I'd want to know who it is - if it actually mattered to my safety or revenue. Which, however, does not mean I would publish a bunch of personal details which have NOTHING TO DO with the a
Re:The Credibility of Groklaw (Score:3)
How much to slap a sticker on SCO fanboys saying that
is only a theory.
Have you actually read any of the court documents at Groklaw, or their analysis? Are you aware of what Judge Kimball wrote last February? Are you aware of what IBM's counte
If I am Elected President... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:If I am Elected President... (Score:2, Informative)
Interview summary: (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Interview summary: (Score:5, Insightful)
I'll never purchase any publication by them again. Doesn't sound like there's much understanding there about the difference between right and wrong. Instead of a believable apology, we're presented with weasel-words.
Re:Interview summary: (Score:2)
As for Gtroklaw, I have an account but I think I posted a couple of comments in the beginning. Today I mostly read the articles and skip the comments. Other than, I have no special feelings about Groklaw and PJ.
Re:Interview summary: (Score:3, Insightful)
I think the correct term is Capitalist, but I can understand how easy they are to confuse.
Re:Interview summary: (Score:2)
Common confusion - free market advocates are about free enterprise. Capitalists are about owning the state and monopolies.
Re:Interview summary: (Score:2)
Slashdotting != DDoS (Score:4, Interesting)
In Korea, only old people call a Slashdotting a cyber attack.
Re:Slashdotting != DDoS (Score:2)
Wouuldn't matter if you DID find the editorial email address.
It doesn't work - bombs with an error message in both IE and FireFox. ALL their email links do the same.
Seems like the "world's leading iMedia company" can't handle using a mailto: properly.
He still doesn't get it (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:He still doesn't get it (Score:2, Interesting)
If one of his writers had written an article published in one of his magazines, do you think he would let him or her just tilt in the wind?
It's one thing to have one's picture published. It's quite another to have details of one's life published for no related reason in an article (i.e., "he lives here [insert picture of rusted out single-wide mobile home] with his mother and grandfather, and drives this [pictu
Re:I thought Slashdot was against hate crimes... (Score:5, Insightful)
The purpose of Federal hate crime legislation is to give the Federal government authority to go in and investigate should the local enforcement NOT do his/her job because said prosecutor, police and justice agrees with the crime because they too hold those prejudices. There are places where a crime against blacks or gays might not be thought of as a biggie and swept under the rug. In most cases, I wouldn't like encroachment of federal power, but it IS a human rights issue and at this point, the local justice system would be broken so someone needs to step in.
Re:He still doesn't get it (Score:2)
If you had a mistress whose husband is in the mob, and told the police you thought he might want you dead, that has a high probability.
Comment removed (Score:4, Insightful)
Big time. (Score:5, Insightful)
Well, that's just sweet. But what does it have to do with anything?
But MOG doesn't appear in print. Her articles are posted on your web site.
So what does anything about "print" have to do with this story?
Still, not in print so why are you talking about this?
Hey! I can write this "note" and try to turn it into a free ad for my wonderful magazine.
Yep. If I ever need to find PJ's mom, I'll know the site that provides that "valuable service".
Yep. Linux Journal certainly wouldn't publish that, even on its web site. Nor any other technical publication.
Did I mention the part about turning this into a free ad?
Thanks for having me on the show, did I mention my new web site? Can I do a quick plug for it?
I'm real sure I mentioned the free ad time. Right?
End your note? You haven't even gotten to the subject.
Give us the gold and you make the rules.
This was not a single article. Read the past ones. You'll see an ongoing stream of hatred.
But those were okay to put on your sites.
Hmmmm..... You might need to check this page then - http://linuxbusinessnews.sys-con.com/read/49228.ht m?CFID=39636&CFTOKEN=75BBE516-14D5-139B-BC4011A448 3558B3 [sys-con.com]
Yep, Linux Business News on the sys-con.com site. And if I may post some of the hate there:
So, PJ is "mysterious".
Maybe it stands for "Pam Jones".
Re:Big time. (Score:2)
We have no intentions of encouraging or hosting an ongoing meaningless and pointless debate at our Web site, which does not go anywhere or accomplish anything and which, frankly, most of our everyday readers don't care for.
Shouldn't be a problem without any readers.
Huh? Does this man use his own dictionary? (Score:4, Interesting)
Either that, or he's purely in the business-as-in-corporate side of things and not the business-as-in-journalism side of things. If that's the case, he shouldn't have been asked to approve O'Gara's ("I decided to publish the article"), or anyone else's works, that job should go to people with editorial responsibilities.
Here's my "favorite" example of confusing statements:
In one part, speaking of Pamela Jones being a blogger not a reporter, he says "The reporter's job is to report news." In another, speaking about O'Gara's hack job, he says "I decided to publish the article. It was published because it was an accurate news story." Are you as confused as I was?
My least-favorite part, if true and I sincerely hope he's mistaken (I think he's confusing a DOS attack with the
"The reason why we decided to pull it [O'Gara's hack job] was that when the content, style and the language of the story was perceived as offensive by a group of the readers, a denial-of-service attack was launched against our entire company, interfering with all of our publications and all of our readers."
Re:Huh? Does this man use his own dictionary? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Huh? Does this man use his own dictionary? (Score:2)
Re:Huh? Does this man use his own dictionary? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, dude. Obviously.
And a lot of those fuckos feel seriously wronged and may not have one's normal moral boundries in place.
I suppose you'd like us to adopt the moral compass of an anonymous poster with a chip on their shoulder? Way to go, champ.
Re:Huh? Does this man use his own dictionary? (Score:2)
Again, I'll believe it when I see the logs. Until then, I'll treat it the same way as I do SCO's magical disappearing code in linux.
Sorry to inform you, but nobody gives a flying fuck about Mareeen O'Gara or SysCon except Pamala Jones and her thralls.
I think you misinterpreted me (my fault). When I said "There are plenty of people out there with both the means and the inclination to launch a DoS attack against sy
That article was linked all over the web. (Score:2)
Re:Huh? Does this man use his own dictionary? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm not sure there WAS any "attack". Did anybody hear about such a thing before this interview? Especially since he claims it was the "biggest DoS attack" ANY media company has suffered?
It sounds to me like this guy was claiming such in order to use the same "OSS people are wackos" claim that Laura DiDio AND MoG used.
Which is very suspicious. It tends to make me think he's part and parcel of the same SCO-loving crew since he uses the exact same tactics.
Not much for an apology (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Not much for an apology (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not much for an apology (Score:5, Insightful)
Pathetic. Anything for some extra traffic, I guess. They certainly got more hits from me than they ever have in the past. At the expense of never getting any more in the future, though. I hope it was worth it, Fuat!
It's a recurring problem (Score:3, Funny)
He doesn't understand what he did wrong when he published the article, and I'll bet dollars to doughnuts he doesn't yet realize what he did wrong in the interview.
I can't imagine anyone with even a shred of a clue, when giving an interview that is almost certain to be linked to by slashdot, giving blanket permision like he did:
He thinks readers are a DDOS! (Score:2)
These online SYS-CON rags must not be getting much traffic. The geek comunity has been avoiding SYS-CON for a while now.
For a brief while it looked like SYS-CON was doing the right thing so we all had a look see. They could not handle the traffic. They have no idea how much traffice they could have if they did the right thing on a regular basis.
What an ass (Score:5, Insightful)
This guy is absolutely classless. I think I'll pass on anything put out by them in the future.
MOG did not know it was the *right* PJ (Score:5, Insightful)
Given that, why plaster the address and pictures of a potentially innocent party across the Internet?
What about the mother? She's not a party to Groklaw in any way, she's not a blogger, a reporter, or anything, yet her address and pictures of her house ended up in the "article".
I'm sorry - I see nothing ethical here.
that clarifies things (Score:5, Informative)
Well, somewhat. (Score:2, Funny)
I'm glad that they canned MOG, but talk about a lack of balls... the damage was already done. They were just tired of being called jackasses, and thought that pulling the article would stop it.
Jackasses.
legal issues, as always (Score:2, Insightful)
He has to forcefully deny any wrongdoing to remove the possibility that at a later trial, a lawyer could just just hand the apology/admission to a jury and say "Here's the evidence, he admitted to it, please make them give PJ $1 (holds pinky to lip) MILLION dollars"
Re:legal issues, as always (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:legal issues, as always (Score:2)
Right - his "forceful denial" that was actually published could be ripped to pieces in five minutes by a retarded attorney.
Most of it can easily be described as a further hatchet job on OSS and PJ in particular, and as SCO-directed bullshit to boot, given that he's using the same "OSS supporters are wacko nutjobs who use DoS tactics" crap that Laura DiDio AND MoG used.
If somebody supoenas his email, I suspect we'd find some interesting stuff.
If he's the best Sys-Con can trot out, the Board of Directors n
I'm going to miss Maureen (Score:5, Funny)
There's just something so cathartic about that.
Oh, wait, Forbes is still printing Daniel Lyons. Never mind.
Help stop "the biggest cyber attack in history" (Score:5, Informative)
127.0.0.1 coldfusion.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 dotnet.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 eclipse.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 issj.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 itsolutions.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 jdj.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 linux.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 linuxbusinessweek.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 mxdj.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 pbdj.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 symbian.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 weblogic.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 webservices.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 websphere.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 wireless.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 www.sys-con.tv
127.0.0.1 xml.sys-con.com
127.0.0.1 www.linuxworld.com
127.0.0.1 www.sys-con.com
Re:Help stop "the biggest cyber attack in history" (Score:3, Informative)
named.conf:
zone sys-con.com{
type master;
file sys-con.com.blackhole;
};
zone sys-con.tv{
type master;
file sys-con.tv.blackhole;
};
put an SOA for sys-con.com and sys-con.tv in the respective files, and a wildcard A record pointing to 127.0.0.1.
Poof...sys-con's gone. Doesn't matter what they change their names to.
That's not really an Interview.. (Score:2)
This raised a question in my mind - what this interview was for? He did not seem to really care about the case n
Spam? (Score:2)
Re:Spam? (Score:2)
Yet he makes a point about how anybody can contact him.
Their editorial email address is working today, so I just sent a nice email to their editorial department pointing out that his brilliant interview has caused Sys-Con to be hated more than ever now.
discussion with Fuat Kircaali (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:discussion with Fuat Kircaali (Score:2)
Re:discussion with Fuat Kircaali (Score:2)
http://www.clientservernews.com/ [clientservernews.com]
Re:discussion with Fuat Kircaali (Score:2)
Thanks for noting how Mr Kircaali really behaves when he's not trying to play the wounded victom. It dovetails nicely with the interview.
unethical ... and cowardly and disloyal (Score:5, Interesting)
"The reason why we decided to pull it [O'Gara's hack job] was that when the content, style and the language of the story was perceived as offensive by a group of the readers, a denial-of-service attack was launched against our entire company, interfering with all of our publications and all of our readers."
Leaving aside the incredible moral blindness of missing what was wrong with the O'Gara article, this guy admits he is willing to dump "entertaining" and "accurate" reporters because of a DOS attack. Nice guy to work for
What a piece of work is Fuat Kircaali.
Re:unethical ... and cowardly and disloyal (Score:2)
Maureen O'Gara did accuse PJ of being a thief (Score:2, Interesting)
A) The Victim
B) A willing accomplice
C) Herself, but not really Pamela Jones
D) All of the above, more wild accusations to come in our next mogwash piece.
Completely apart of the deliberate slurs and slants, criminal accusations make for straightforward Defamation cases.
Mr. Kirkaali says that PJ should not fear thieves, but seems blissully unaware that his own jourmalist accused Pamela Jones to be a thief
Re:Maureen O'Gara did accuse PJ of being a thief (Score:2)
Shameful (Score:5, Insightful)
Reminds me of something earlier in the SCO saga (Score:3, Interesting)
World's leading i-technology magazine publisher (Score:5, Funny)
I suppose it could be worse, they could be an "i-technology e-magazine net-publisher".
OK I changed my mind back again........ (Score:4, Insightful)
If MOGs story WERE legitimate and they fired MOG not because of her story but because of it's unpopularity then that too would be mucho unethical.
Throw Sys-Con and it's publications into your meat/cyber space equivalent of a kill file.
Reminds me of tabloid journalism (Score:2)
Incidentally... (Score:5, Interesting)
More grist (Score:2)
Re:More grist (Score:2)
There seems to be an interesting amount of media attention. And an interesting spin. Is this simply dust kicked up from an interesting incident? Or is it being driven by someone's PR firm?
There was a recent Slashdot article noting how the vast majority of news stories (outside of events like disasters, etc) are driven by PR firms. One example given was the "suits a
More Contact Information, Less Communication (Score:2)
Here is the phone number for G2 Computer Intelligence, 516 XXX-7025. Most unknown emails go to spam boxes these days, at least in my case.
Uh-huh. And how many phone calls get shunted to an "answering (see the irony in that adjective?) machine" where you have to know the exact code in order to speak with a human being?
We've gotten so good at avoiding real communication and providing pseudo-communication that it's pissing people off.
The preceding has been a pre-programmed response from [insert name
That guy is an obsequious weasel of a human being. (Score:2)
In my opinion, until this guy recants the idiocy he spews in this article (or leaves the company), Sys-Co
Editorial responsibility? (Score:3, Insightful)
I don't know much about publishing. But, I thought that controlling content was indeed the responsibility of the editor?
If I were the editor, and I saw content that included publishing the address, and photos, of the home of PJ's elderly monther; I don't think I'd publish the story. That is the responsibility of an editor, isn't it?
Also, why does a tech publisher want to publish the address of a blogger's elderly mother? How is that related to technology?
FIrst amendment rights ... (Score:3, Interesting)
[alas, to many, the answer is yes, but I digress
Did you look behind the couch? When I lose something, that's where I usually first look.
Though I wonder if you've really lost them -- after all, the First Amendment says that `Congress shall pass no law' ... and while this has generally been interpeted as meaning that the Government shall pass no law abridging your freedom of speech, in this case, I see no law having been passed. So what are you complaining about when you ask about your First Amendment Rights?
Hers seem to be perfectly functional as well. Did she lose hers too? Freedom of the press belongs to those who own the press. You own your press, and so you have freedom of press, and you used it. What's the problem?As for the story you posted, what did you think the response would be? I'm not talking about the DoS attacks, but just the general reaction from the more `moderate' people? Did you think that people would appreciate knowing who PJ was? Was that news?
As far as the DoS attacks go, call the FBI. You should be able to assign a large dollar figure to the damage being caused, and so the FBI will probably take your complaint seriously. Nail the bastards! Seriously. I don't approve of what you've done, but you've already given yourself enough problems -- we don't need criminals adding to them with DoS attacks.
As for the rest of the world (the people who are saying that you made a poor decision, in varying degrees of articulateness), well, you made your bed -- now lie in it. I don't feel sorry for you. You may have had every right to post the story (or maybe not -- it sort of looked like a threat. But I'll leave that to the lawyers) -- but the bad will you've just gained with a signifigant portion of the community can't be a good thing.
Re:FIrst amendment rights ... (Score:3, Interesting)
The logic here is that in order for sys-con to provide service, they need a positive revenue stream, wh
Re:FIrst amendment rights ... (Score:2)
Absolutely. His servers, his domain. He can do whatever he wants with them.
As for the DoS attacks, they're nothing new. People have been getting hit with them for various reasons for quite some time now. N
He didn't get it. (Score:2, Insightful)
He just doesn't get it. He thinks "Me Media! Me almighty journalist! Me do what I like! Me No apologize but call YOU moron! Worship Media!"
We think "God, what a idiot."
and they wonder why we don't trust them?
What does ethics have to do with journalism? (Score:2, Interesting)
To quote Fuat Kircaali, CEO of Sys-Con:
What does ethics have anything to do with professional reporting and journalism?
What indeed. And people wonder why so many CEOs are going on trial.
This notion that being a "journalist" justifies invasions of privacy of all kinds against all kinds of people may be the straw that breaks the camel's back for most Americans, and results in reigning in press abuses. One can only hope. For my part, while I don't normally approve of DoS attacks, in this cas
Things That Happen to Sr. Editors During Reunions (Score:4, Informative)
James Turner
Senior Editor
LinuxWorld Magazine
The Publisher Is An Asshole (Score:2)
His entire remarks demonstrate it to anyone who can read.
I suspect he's bullshitting about the DoS attack, as well. While I had problems accessing Linux Business News (and by the way, they send you an email every time another response is made to the article you post to, and they offer an opt-out link - which doesn't work!), I neither saw nor heard of any DoS attack on them.
His response is the classic human primate response of claiming to be completely blameless and on the side of "right" when caught doin
LinuxWorld Editors Resign! (Score:3, Informative)
I cancelled my free subscription (Score:2)
Sr. Editorial Staff of LinuxWorld Mag Resigns... (Score:4, Informative)
The Other Shoe Drops
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Senior Editorial Staff of LinuxWorld Magazine Announce Resignations
MONTVALE, New Jersey, May 14th, 2005 --- The entire senior editorial staff of LinuxWorld Magazine has today announced that they will be leaving the magazine, effective immediately.
The following statement was released by the group. "We regret that Sys-Con Media has been unable to apply a standard of journalistic ethics that we can comfortably operate under. We feel that recent articles published with the consent of Sys-Con Media fail to meet minimum generally accepted journalistic codes, and because the management of Sys-Con Media has failed to acknowledge that the articles are by all informed judgment ethically unsupportable, we have decided we must find other avenues for our work."
FOR MORE INFORMATION CONTACT:
James Turner
turner@blackbear.com
603-552-2020
Dee-Ann LeBlanc
dee@renaissoft.com
(604) 898-8433
posted Saturday, 14 May 2005
He came across as somewhat of an arsehole (Score:3, Insightful)
Instead he chose to use his time to pick nits about whether bloggers are reporters and whether the telephone numbers which were published were business or personal.
And then he launched into a lengthy diatribe about how his websites were being DOSed by "fanatics" and how people were complaining to his advertisers.
The "DOS" was most likely just a slashdotting. I know for a fact that Groklaw suffered load related problems when the "Intimidation" and followup articles were posted. Groklaw hit some kind of resource limit on comments on the "Intimidation" article, and I was seeing PHP error messages too. If Mr Kircaali saw a much higher flow of traffic than usual, for several days afterward, that would be because he didn't pull all of the Maureen O'Gara stories off his websites, contrary to his promise. There were reports that some stories had remained and my impression is that it took a few days before they were all gone. Of course people are going to reload the site frequently during this time - those who care whether SYS-CON.COM keeps its promise, and those who care whether any Maureen O'Gara stories remain.
And as for the second horn of Mr Kircaali's contention, that people were unjustly contacting his advertisers, my understanding is that the continued presence of Maureen O'Gara at SYS-CON.COM had been an issue for 6 months and Mr Kircaali had refused to terminate her for that length of time. If something's an issue for that long, of course somebody is going to escalate it. And the advertisers are ultimately Mr Kircaali's boss.
Mr Kircaali defends the practice of running Microsoft advertisements on a Linux website by asserting the absurdity of refusing to run Microsoft advertisements on a Microsoft website. This is a straw man argument; few people would complain about seeing Microsoft advertisements on a .NET website. But Microsoft is
the enemy of Linux specifically and Free Software
in general, so it is rather disturbing that an OSS
advocacy site should run their advertisements (this
includes Slashdot).
Finally Mr Kircaali closes with some choice weasel words on the issue of privacy, an unsubtle insult to Groklaw's readers ("if the majority of Ms. Jones' readers are the same people whom we dealt with this week, now I understand better why she may want to remain anonymous") and a bit of bignoting themselves as the victim: a media company who became a victim of perhaps the biggest cyber attack in history.
My opinion is, whatever the merits of Mr Kircaali's arguments, he chose exactly the wrong way to close off the matter. I doubt he has endeared himself to anybody except Microsoft, who believe they benefit by painting Linux supporters as vigilante zealots.
Society of Professional Journalists Ethics Commite (Score:4, Informative)
James Turner, former senior editor of LinuxWorld wrote Fred Brown of the Society of Professional Journalists Ethics Commitee. Here is what Fred Brown wrote:
James,
I agree with you. That piece by O'Gara definitely is outside the norms of good journalism. It's bullying, insulting and harassing, and I, for
one, really don't get the point of it. That's not to say that other journalists are sometimes guilty of those sins, but that still doesn't make it
good journalism.
So I don't think you did the wrong thing in using you First Amendment rights to call for O'Gara's ouster or reprimand or whatever. The SPJ Code of
Ethics says ethical journalists should "expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media" and "abide by the same high standards to which they hold others."
Fred Brown
Co-chair, SPJ Ethics Committee
http://turner.linuxworld.com/read/1277987.htm [linuxworld.com]
Update. (Score:2)
Nobody can stand Fuat any longer. The ones who can go do something else have decided to do just that.
The sooner IDG gets its trademark back from Sys-Con the better.
Sys-Con - System of a Con.
--
BMO
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:5, Insightful)
O'Gara's piece was an attempt at a smear job by painting PJ as a crazy elderly Jehovah's Witness. Those in the SCO camp/pro-SCO people must be incredibly desperate to be resorting to tactics like that.
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:2)
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:2, Insightful)
On top of that he says he found "nothing unethical" about the article. How could you ever trust a publication with an editor like that?
I will be checking my all of magazines for any reference to "Fuat Kircaali" or "Sys-Con Media" and not purchasing anything of the sort.
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:5, Informative)
What MOG did was not an opinion piece; it was, in fact, illegal. PJ is, by her own words, considering her legal options right now, but nobody has the right to a) trespass in another person's home (as MOG all but admits she did in her article, commenting on how the interior of PJ's home looks, noting she was not home at the time), b) list the addresses and telephone numbers of relatives, and c) slander another person publicly with unverified information.
I note that you're an anonymous coward so you obviously do not want us to know who you are. I wonder why?
What MOG did was beyond sleazy; it was illegal, journalistically unethical and personally immoral, and if she was silenced for that, she has nobody to blame but herself.
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:2, Insightful)
OGara tried to figure out if there was an IBM-PJ connection, failed and published a fluff piece about PJ's car anyway. That's just crap journalism and a shitty thing to do.
As for PJ, her little internet soapbox made here a "public figure" and now she learns this has real world consequences. She basically started this nasty bitchfight with OGara, no suprise that someone bothered figu
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:5, Insightful)
Also the information was unverified. The whole thing to me sounds like a smear story, no matter which way you look at it.
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:2, Insightful)
It was a smear story. However, (hypothetically) if O'Gara had found IBM pay stubs all over PJ's desk, then it would have been legitimate journalism. Therefore stalking her house was a legitimate journalistic tactic.
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:3, Informative)
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I think you misunderstand `trespassing' (Score:2)
Right - just try your scenario.
See you in a year (or two) after your ass has been fudge-packed by your cellie at the state joint or county jail you will be occupying.
IANAL either - but you're very ANAL.
There are plenty of criminal codes that will be used against you for "waltzing" anywhere you aren't wanted.
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:5, Insightful)
Among them stereotyping by race, gender, age, religion, ethnicity, geography, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, or social status.
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:2)
NONE of which has anything to do with Maureen O'Gara who is an SCO shill and a deliberate opponent of OSS.
More importantly, Sys-Con is run by an asshole who is now attacking OSS people as criminal wackos who caused his
Regarding Mormons and PJ (Score:4, Informative)
Re:A Chilling Effect (Score:3, Insightful)
O'gara didn't write this to readers. She wrote this directly to PJ, intending to shake her up by instilling an uneasy sense of fear not only for herself, but FOR HER FAMILY. "Watch your step, PJ. You'd never forgive your
That's how publishing tends to work (Score:5, Insightful)
"Church" is the editorial department. The head of an editorial department is the editor-in-chief.
"State" is the publishing side. This is where all the marketing, advertising, sales type stuff happens. The head of the publishing side of the business is the publisher. Typically the publisher does not get a direct say in what goes into the magazine. He can object, but what the editor-in-chief says goes. In a well-run operation, the publisher might get a lot of say in what goes on the front cover of a magazine (because you can consider the cover a marketing vehicle as much as it is an editorial one) but that's about where it ends.
The role of CEO is trickier. Doubtless this is a business position. Probably the role of the CEO has more to do with preserving a brand identity for the book through its editorial content. The CEO is probably not all that involved in the day-to-day operations of choosing which articles to publish and which not to publish. He probably does get some say in the matter, though; so, if there's a problem, he probably goes and yells at the editor-in-chief at 4pm on a Friday afternoon and everybody needs to bust ass over the weekend to fix things.
Anyway -- in a well-run publishing outfit that has not compromised its journalistic integrity, the "church" and "state" sides are separate (which is why people tend to call them that). And to tell you the truth, I have no reason to believe this isn't how it is at Sys-Con.
When O'Gara's article was published, who raised the stink? The editor-in-chief of LinuxWorld. Sounds good so far; it's his job to meddle in content. But how did it get published in the first place? Because the editor-in-chief of LinuxWorld doesn't have oversight over it. If O'Gara's content was published as part of a normal publishing structure, perhaps he would. But apparently, according to what Mr. Kircaali says, it is Maureen O'Gara who has oversight over what she publishes. Sys-Con merely "syndicates" it, meaning she basically gets a rubber stamp from Kircaali and nobody even bothers to read it. And I quote:
So, to Mr. Kircaali: You're quick to put down blogs, but how is what Ms. O'Gara does any different, if there's no editorial oversight? If nobody's her boss, nobody decided what she should or should not write about, nobody has oversight over her storiesI think the reason this guy's answers come off so terribly is that he's really not used to being in a position to defend editorial content. He's a business guy. He gets content, he syndicates it on the Web. Certain content goes out without the backing of an editorial department or the oversight of any staff editors? Great! All the cheaper. Well, now it's come to bite him in the ass and he really doesn't know what to say about it, except that he wishes it would all go away and he could go back to running his business.
Re:Your Rights Online? (Score:2)
Maureen did not post a private phone number. Here's a comment from earlier in this story...
Re:Your Rights Online? (Score:2)
You're an idiot.
440 Eddy Street, #424, San Francisco, California
Come on down.
Moron.
Re:Your Rights Online? (Score:2)
So you live in the Tenderloin -- one of the most rat infested hoods in the city. I don't see why anyone would want to come on down to your place, unless it was to buy some crack or get a good "gumming" by your "girlfriend".
Re:Was this "DoS" a Slashdotting? (Score:2, Funny)