IE7 Will Have Tabbed Browsing 748
loconet writes that early yesterday morning, "Dean Hachamovitch, IE product unit manager, confirmed that IE7, like Opera and Firefox first did years ago, will have tabbed browsing as one of its new features. Asa Dotzler,from Mozilla, points out that Dean reminds IE users who have not upgraded to XP that tabbed browsing can be added to IE through 3rd-party add-ons." cryptoz adds a link to this InformationWeek story which says that the tabs will be very "'basic' due to fears from Microsoft that tabbed browsing might scare off too many users. The feature is only being included because IE is slipping in the browser share market."
Allow users to uninstall and reinstall as needed (Score:4, Insightful)
My brother had his PC infected by a smart viral strain of CoolWebsearch, a nasty Browser Hijacker. I ended up spending a few hours trying to clean it and every time I thought I did, it would pop back up. I gave up, installed Firefox and asked him never to touch IE again. If I had the ability to go to the Control Panel, and nuke IE altogether, thereby getting rid of any unsavory plugins that might have been installed along with it, and doing a fresh install back again, I wouldnt have forced him to move to Firefox. I understand that Browser Hijacker has aspects outside the realm of the browser, but providing the ability to uninstall and reinstall gives power back to the user.
And this is totally understandable for a bad product. Obviously you want to strap it down with hooks in to the OS as deep as you could, preventing anyone from removing it, since if the user realizes that they could remove it, the first thing they would want to do is nuke it.
Turn off-able? (Score:2, Insightful)
Cancel button after download (Score:5, Insightful)
This is really a stupid "feature" of IE. I doubt they'll fix it cause well quite frankly I won't be surprised if IE developers use FireFox.
What style of tabbed browsing will IE7 use? (Score:2, Insightful)
Share slipping... (Score:5, Insightful)
Umm...and? I think there is some implied meaning in the above statement, but I'm not sure what it is. Isn't that what companies do? If they see trends in the market shift towards certain features/needs/wants of consumers, they respond with providing consumers with what they want.
Duh (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsoft just doesn't seem to get it. From an "ease of use" standpoint, the best software is designed so that it's easy for a novice to use -- by hiding the "scary" options and so on. But it's also designed so that a user whose comfortable with the software can learn tricks, customizations, and so on to make his work faster. In short, the software has to grow as the user's skills grow.
Very few companies actually get this. Apple has made progress in this direction, as has the open source movement. But they're both well off.
Fabulous New Innovation (Score:3, Insightful)
Never gonna happen man (Score:2, Insightful)
I agree wholeheartadly, but the main reason Internet Explorer dominates 85 - 95% of the market (depending on who you ask) is that it is bundled with Windows, and not really removable. I've noticed that even when I recommend Firefox to Windows users, they eventually go back to using IE, partly because it's "just there" and won't sod off.
Because of this, and aside from the technical reasons, I don't think Microsoft have any motivation to enable IE to be uninstalled easily though Add/Remove programs.
whoopdy doo (Score:5, Insightful)
And they're working on tabs?
Re:Allow users to uninstall and reinstall as neede (Score:2, Insightful)
The reason its 'part of the OS' is that the back-end http protocol handlers are reused by every application (well, those that don't want to reinvent the wheel) to connect to the internet. 'Remove' IE (and I guess you don't mean remove 'just the GUI') would cripple a great many programs out there.
Have you tried spyware removal tools? Or even a anti-virus program? Alternatively, just vape all the browser helper objects (search the registry, you'll find them) which sounds like what your problem was all along.
Mind you, I reinstall firefox regularly (every time a new version 'patch' comes out), and every time I re-install it, all my extensions are all there as before. Strange that. I guess if I was hit by some firefox malware then reinstalling it (in the same way you describe you want for IE) would have no effect. I think you'd best stick with IE.
Re:Cancel button after download (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Cancel button after download (Score:3, Insightful)
If a popup can grab the focus like that, a malicious program that needs user interaction to do its badness could keep on popping up dialogs until it gets lucky and the user just happens to be hitting the "Y" key at the same time.
I don't Comprendo. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I am just so floored... (Score:3, Insightful)
Ironically, IE used to be exactly like Firefox: Up against a monster behemoth (Netscape) which was starting to stagnate, and fall in quality a bit. I find it odd that they didn't learn from that experience, and instead decided to rest on their laurels after stomping Netscape. They really should have seen Firefox (or something similar) coming, especially as IE hasn't really had any new development since 5.0 or so, save periodic security patches and such.
But anyway, competition is good! I hope IE does continue to try to put features in IE. Maybe Firefox can force Microsoft into keeping it up-to-date.
Re:Share slipping... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:whoopdy doo (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:I don't Comprendo. (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Office next? (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Allow users to uninstall and reinstall as neede (Score:5, Insightful)
Lots of stuff, both MS and third party, uses mshtml.dll for rendering of HTML because it is guaranteed to exist.
What could be useful is the ability to return IE to an "official" condition, eg base OS install, SP 1, etc, in a single step. That would either require a read-only medium, or some particularly impressive voodoo magic to ensure the integrity of the installation files (whether cached or redownloaded).
Never forget that a machine infested with spyware is compromised. If you're sufficiently paranoid, you can't trust *any* data or executable on it any more.
Re:I don't Comprendo. (Score:5, Insightful)
Why is the "web browser" even considered a "market"? It's not like I pay any extra for IE. For that matter, most of these browsers are free, right?
From a consumer/end-user perspective, you're probably right. From a content-creator/geek perspective, the "market" is dominated by a browser that doesn't play nice with other browsers, leaving the web-content people with a choice: (1) support IE and ignore everything else, (2) ignore IE and code to standards, or (3) code to standards, then hack until it works on IE. I "choose" option 3, but I live for the day standards-compliant browsers like Firefox, Opera, Konqueror and Safari dominate the market.
So... long story short: it's only folk like me who consider there to be a web browser market... probably!
Re:Office next? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:My non-technical Father LOVES Tabs! (Score:1, Insightful)
Are they really? Microsoft has waited a long time to release a new browser. During this time they have seen what people like in other browsers and are adding those features to IE7; hence making them in-touch with the average computer user.
IE, Idiots Explorer (Score:1, Insightful)
I have to use IE on my Uni PC's and it chuckles me when I see people click on a link and get blasted with new Windows and popups, it is an absolute joke and should be dumped by all. If there were awards for the worst pieces of software ever written then I believe the IE series would scoop the lot.
Internet Exploring for those who do not know better.
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:IE, Idiots Explorer (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Share slipping... (Score:4, Insightful)
What IE7 needs is a better security model (Score:5, Insightful)
If you think the lack of Tabbed browsing is reducing IE's popularity, then I want whatever you are smoking. IE is getting unpopular due to spyware and drive-by-installs of malware. Why people are switching to firefox is to avoid those porn popups and phishing sites.
Security and geeks tired of fixing their in-law's PC's is the reason for IE's market share dipping. Oh, and faster PC's capable of rendering XUL fast.Re:Allow users to uninstall and reinstall as neede (Score:3, Insightful)
Well the fact that "everyone else" (OS X, KDE, GNOME) has since gone down that road would suggest is was a reasonably good idea. Code re-use generally *is* considered good programming, after all.
Re:What's the big deal? (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, for one, multiple windows tend to overlap and obscure each other. You then need to sift through their icons on the taskbar (Windows, Linux desktops) or use Exposé to see them all neatly arranged on the screen (OS X), then click on the one you want to use.
In any case, that's a lot more UI work than clicking tabs on a tablist which is always in sight, or using shortcuts to move through it.
Robust & Microsoft in the same sentence? (Score:2, Insightful)
-The BSOD
Re:Allow users to uninstall and reinstall as neede (Score:3, Insightful)
Kinda defeats the whole purpose, doesn't it ?
Re:Scared? (Score:5, Insightful)
Now I switch between those tasks. If I want to reference a page while I write a document the ALT-TAB still works, so I can jump back and forth. Then if I want to reference another web page, I switch my task over to "browsing the web" find the tab (sub-task) in the browser window and the ALT-TAB back to the document to continue.
Clear separation of user's view of tasks (things I have to do) rather than the os view of tasks (processes I am running).
Now contrast that to having 20 browser windows, 4 documents and a media player. All of a sudden I can't see the wood for the trees.
Re:Scared? (Score:2, Insightful)
or are you just trolling?
Prediction! (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Scared? (Score:5, Insightful)
It's called a hierarchy, and it can be quite important. Let's change your situation around a bit, shall we? Let's say you wanted to switch from Word to Outlook. How would you do it without this hierarchy?
alt+tab Excel - no.
alt+tab Firefox - no.
alt+tab Firefox (tab 2) - no.
alt+tab Firefox (tab 3) - no!
alt+tab Firefox (tab 4) - NO!
alt+tab Firefox (tab 5) - NO!!!
alt+tab Outlook - yes, finally!
Re:Scared? (Score:3, Insightful)
The point is, you have a *lot* of choice. Asking your average slashdotter will get you no where.
Proposed tab solution (Score:3, Insightful)
With my web browser, I have never found the need to use tabs. In fact, tabs have often confused me because I wind up having two or three firefox windows each with a variety of tabs, and they aren't organized well. In VS.net, every window is a solution and the tabs are documents in that solution, but in a browser, there is no analogous divider, so I would like the ability to move tabs between windows.
Some poster above wanted tabs in all MS Office apps, this just proves that the concept of tabs could be universally applied to all applications... kind of like the taskbar! Think about it, tabs aren't any different than a taskbar, except they are nested one level deeper.
I propose a hierarchical, organizable taskbar. Rather than a hard and fast rule like "if the taskbar gets full, group like applications" I would like to be able to create groups and move windows into and out of groups. Applications should have API control over their own windows organization (user overridable of course), so VS.net could, for example, group applications by solution.
This solution eliminates the need to add tabs support to every single application and creates a common and more robust tab solution.
What does everyone think?
Re:How is that different from MDI? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, I realized that after I posted... Thing is, I still run Office 97 on my Win2K machine, but I switched my main desktop to Linux a LONG time ago.
The switch to SDI seems to have been driven by a combination of two factors -- dumb users and/or a poor user interface to MDI. Part of the problem with MDI is that Microsoft's implementation of it didn't have a visual metaphor. It was famously confusing for ordinary end users. People seem to adapt to tabbed browsing just fine, though, and the visual metaphor is the reason for that.
Perhaps the real reason that Microsoft has been slow to adapt tabs in IE is they realize how they screwed up in eliminating MDI, instead of just improving its interface. They want to postpone the inevitable day when they have to resurrect MDI with tabs, and the associated ribbing they'll get from the rest of the industry when they do that. If they delay long enough, they'll be able to spin it as an "innovation" in Office instead of correcting a mistake.
Re:Scared? (Score:5, Insightful)
Excel
Visual Studio
Re:Tabbed brainwash (Score:3, Insightful)
Twaddle. The IE rendering engine is modular, which is why everything uses it, which is why everyone complains "it's a part of the OS". Visual Studio.NET, for example, has tabs that can contain IE controls - you can use it in effect as a tabbed browser. Ditto recent versions of HTML help.
Re:Scared? (Score:3, Insightful)
Thats nice, but a tabbed browser that does not tell you in the status bar if the link you are following will open up a new window or not is useless in my opinion. Now why oh why do web designers feel the compulsion to put every damn link in a new window is another question. What's even worse is when they open up all the new links with the same name so if you are daring enough to want to open up more than one window at a time the last one always wins.
Yes, but (Score:3, Insightful)
Microsofts strategy is not innovation. It never has been.
What it has been doing, is to incorporate things in so that for 70 - 80 % of the people, things work fairly ok.
A friend of mine has been using XP for some time, and when I tried to convert him over to 10.3, he was like - why should I? Luna (the XP theme) is good enough for me.
I think this is the critical statement. Good enough. As soon as IE has few enough security holes that Microsoft Anti-Spyware can catch everything that sneaks through, what need has Joe User for Firefox?
Seriously. Think about it. On my XP box, I use ZoneAlarm. There is now a one-way firewall with SP2. I use Ad-Aware and Spybot, along with HijackThis. There is a beta-version of MS anti-Spyware available.
I also use something called Anti-Vir. Mostly because NAV was such a piece of bloatware. Now with rumours that there will be a MS branded antivirus program, tell me, which Joe User is going to keep a multitude of programs, each of which need to be updated seperately, instead of some Microsoft Security Program, which keeps 80-90% of all the Bad Stuff(tm) off their computer?
In one way, this is probably a good thing. It frees up resources which were previously going to fix security holes to develop cool new features. However, I am, personally a little concerned about the dominance of one company over so many diverse parts of the user-experience.
Ah well. There is always my Mac.
Take care, R.
Re:Cancel button after download (Score:1, Insightful)
It's especially annoying when my temp directory doesn't have enough space to download the file, but the drive I told IE to put the file on does have enough space to hold the file, and IE fails to download the file because the temp directory can't hold it!
Retarded monkeys designed IE, I'm sure of it.
Re:Share slipping... (Score:2, Insightful)