Electric Cars as Fast as Ferraris 739
Posted
by
samzenpus
from the how-many-batteries dept.
from the how-many-batteries dept.
Ubergrunt writes "A Welsh engineering company has made a motor to be used on electric cars that will make them as fast as a Ferrari. "The motor is revolutionary in that it contains no bulky permanent magnets. Instead it relies on transmitting electric pulses across up to seven rotors, arranged in different phases. These are "fired up" in turn, much like the pistons of an internal combustion engine. There are no gears - the motor provides enough torque at one revolution per minute to put a vehicle into motion - and it spins at up to 2,500rpm.
"Size for size, we can provide 400% more torque than any type of motor currently available," says managing director John Bryant."
Re:Hmmm, won't be that fast when you add batteries (Score:4, Interesting)
Vehicle detectors at intersections use induction to count vehicles. If you stop on one you could theoretically use inductive coupling to charge your battery, at the expense of the government.
I have seen plans for charging up battery and flywheel powered vehicles in this manner, but with more powerfull inductors.
That's the humungous bulk of the motors sorted out (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Torque (Score:3, Interesting)
Whaaaaaaa? There is no such thing as "infinite torque."
Electric motors produce their maximum torque at 0 rpm. And this amount of torque depends on the size of the motor, the current, etc.
Toyota hybrid news? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Gas turbines have this beat (Score:5, Interesting)
Case in point- the turbine powered M1 tank. Performs like a bat out of hell, at least as far as tanks go, but tanks spend a *lot* of time sitting around idling. I could idle my old M60 for an entire night and still have a nearly full tank in the morning. (In practice you usually run the engine for a short while to recharge batteries and shut down.)
Now try to do that with an M1- you'll be out of gas in a heartbeat. The problem is so severe that the M1A2 has a second mini-turbine engine just for idling so that it will only drain 3-5 gallons/hour.
Stop and go traffic with a turbine car will get you something that makes a Hummer limo look like a Prius.
Re:Obligatory bash quote (Score:3, Interesting)
If electric cars really can deliver that in a way that surpasses (or even on-par with) internal combustion engines, then I think we'll be seeing the end of the IC engine in the next 20 years... that's a big "if" though.
Re:Obligatory bash quote (Score:3, Interesting)
penile size (Score:2, Interesting)
Because these things are mating strategies. Chimps and other primates (people) make loud noises in public to attract attention and express dominance in the local group. People now have very complex dominance hierarchies, but the behaviors are still ingrained from the quite recent past when we all lived in small groups just like chimps. Chimps and gorillas yank on branches and throw things around. People rev their engines. But it's all fucked up and nobody understands it because these guys can BUY loud engines/harleys etc. We do it without understanding why, just like all instinctual behavior. Of COURSE it's fun! Being at the top of the dominance hierarchy means you get the most sex, food, places to hang out, and you also get to push around those lower-ranking doofs. And doing these behaviors (revving engines, playing loud music etc) are going to FEEL fun to our brains, because the unconscious part of our mind knows it's going to pay off in mates, food, position etc.
People equate these things with 'small penis' as a shorthand way of saying 'this guy wouldn't even make beta male in a real primate group.'
I have a question for all you folks out there: why don't women ever rev their engines, burn off their tires etc? Nobody talks about "whoa, she must be making up for her tiny vulva" or something.