How To Balance Life And Technology For Kids? 425
brs165 writes "Being a newly minted geek father as of 4 months ago, I've thought about problems I've never had reason to consider before. One issue which I'd like to hear from the ./ crowd is introducing technology to their children. What got me thinking about this was a blog post about 'Nature-Deficit Disorder', and I think it brings up some good points. I grew up playing in the local woods and creek with minimal tech until our first computer when I was 13. I hear stories from coworkers how some of their kids/grandkids hating going outside because it is boring and they'd rather stay indoors. Should I avoid introducing them to technology until absolutely neccessary, or is it a matter of achieving a balance?"
Your influence is the number one thing (Score:5, Insightful)
But the real thing is: Your kid(s) will be into whatever you're into. If all you do is stay inside with the XBox and plasma TV, don't be surprised if that's all they ever want to do. For Father's Day (in the US) today, I took the boys on a bike ride, then we did waste a beautiful summer afternoon in the movie theater watching Ep 3.
Always look for ways to re-live your youth with them: Legos, Star Wars, bike riding, snow forts, adventures in the woods, baseball, and mindless shows on Cartoon Network all play a part. The computer is just a new element to share together.
--H
Hold off on the tech. (Score:2, Insightful)
Technology is not a substitute (Score:2, Insightful)
In my opinion, children should be introduced to as much as the world has to offer. The problems occur when parents sit a child in front of a television or a computer and say "here, entertain yourself."
These are the kids that grow up with technology as a substitute for guidance. They will obviously become attached.
Moderation and interaction are the key.
Balance? Ha. Who needs it? (Score:2, Insightful)
get them outdoors (Score:5, Insightful)
DO: get them outside, go canoeing, biking, hiking, walking, skiing, camping, exploring, build and launch model rockets (please, lauch outside), build a treehouse... If you must involve technology, bring a GPS and a digital camera (but don't forget a map and compass - be sure they know how to use those when the GPS batteries die). While you are out there, talk to them abou the plants species, the mountains, how the compass works, how the water flows around the canoe and what make the bike stable while it is moving.
What did you enjoy doing outside as a kid? Why not try that? If they enjoy it too, that's great - you are doing somehting you enjoy outside, and your kids are there and having fun too!!
Is it possible for you to even raise your kids without a TV? I can certainly live without a TV (over a year now, almost 3 years depending on how you count it).
DO NOT: buy a Nintendo/PS3/XBox and let the toy babysit the kids for you. People at Slashdot will expel the virtues of how they learned problem solving and "other skills" while playing video games. Well, I learned a few German words playing a foreign game, and picked up some geography from Civ3, but try and keep the video games to a minimum.
Being a parent is an active responsibility (but it can be fun). Just be sure you go exploring. If you are having fun, they probably will be too. If the kids look forward to going biking with dad more than sitting in front of the boob-tube playing Mari Kart 12, you are doing your job well! If they hear "Dad's home, and were building rockets tonight!" and drop the video game in the middle of a game to join you, you are doing great!
Or is it a matter of achieving a balance? (Score:1, Insightful)
Some thoughts (Score:4, Insightful)
It's probably a better idea to introduce your kids to computers and all that early on. Compare it to the TV - your kids are most likely going to be allowed to watch TV before they're 14 (or whatever), but that doesn't mean you'll allow them to do it for eight hours each day without checking *what* they watch.
Do give them limits; enforce them, but don't be arbitrary. Above all, make them transparent and understandable - if you tell your kids that they can use the computer, but for an hour only, that's much better than only coming in after an hour and telling them that they have to stop *now*.
Don't give them a bad example; if you don't do anything except sit at the computer (or, more generally, stay indoors) all day, then your kids *will* question why it's bad for them if it obviously isn't bad for you, too.
That's about what I can think of right now. As a disclaimer, though, I don't have kids myself.
Re:Balance (Score:1, Insightful)
Balance means, for instance, approaching your work and hobbies with equal sincerity, so that both are edifying. If you teach your kids to 'putz around but work hard now and then!' they'll never learn to take joy from small things until far too late in life.
In terms of Sunlight vs. CRT, this means letting experiences from both worlds inform and instruct the other. You can't just juxtapose two extremes and say, "There, all balanced!"
That's like trying to balance thin air with lead. Life won't let you zero things out like that.
Re:Nature/Tech (Score:3, Insightful)
Think about it, many of us didn't have all of these technological toys when we were little, and we seemed to adapt just fine. Computer usage isn't some sort of esoteric skill that requires years of training to master. It's not like you're trying to levitate cars with your mind.
Perhaps if children were exposed to life outside of the digital babysitter they would develop their imaginations more, and become more creative, healthier (mentally and physically) people. Maybe if more kids ran around outside more often, child obesity wouldn't be so prevelent in our society.
Overall, as with most things a balance is what is necessary. Sure I had my Atari when I was a kid, but I was only allowed to play with it for a certain amount of time. Just as TV was limited. The same can be done with a computer, especially if your child doesn't have all of these technological wonders in their bedroom. Show your child all that the world has to offer and what the imagination can do with it.
And a final thought on, "what you want your kid to be when he/she grows up." - that decision should ultimately be left up to your child once they're old enough to make it, not one that should be forced on them from birth. I've seen many a miserable engineer and computer scientist for just that reason.
More than balance - life is more than Nature/Tech (Score:3, Insightful)
Pretty soon they will tell you what they are interested in, yet keep pushing them in many directions they will continue to discover things they like and develop many talents.
Point is, you only get one shot, so introduce your kids to everything you can. They will thank you for it later.
Re:Welcome to the modern world... (Score:1, Insightful)
TV is a complete waste of time. PBS was good, but I know it will not be later on... Even then, the benefit of PBS to me was minor. The harm of all that other tv was much worse.
I do not have a tv in the house. I make them read. kids have no imagination in the usa.
video games have some benefit. but I'd review them all 1st. I would promote old classics from the golden NES/SNES years. the new games are trying too hard to put you into a crappy movie world. They also leave nothing for imagination, most don't require any real skill level, are for the illiterate, and are made for lazy gamers who can't stand a challange.
Delaying gratification is a major lesson completely ignored in american culture today.
Re:Pete, get a vasectomy... (Score:1, Insightful)
I have three words for you: Salt Lake City -- How much you want to bet?
Dogs v. Nature (Score:4, Insightful)
Pets are more of a consumer product than they are an introduction to nature.
I've spent most of my life without a dog. Coco [protophoto.com] showed up on the porch a year and a half ago. I take her on regular walks in the mountains. It is freightening the amount of destruction I see being done by dogs.
In a discussion on the value of pets. Yes, kids and dogs are a great combination. However, pets are about the domination of animals. Taking Coco on trips into the mountains, I am now starting to see the extent to which dogs dominate recreation and the affect that they have on the diminishing nature around us.
In other words, you should only have a dog if you really, really want to have a dog. You should only have a dog if you are wanting a pet to be a primary focus of your recreation time.
You should budget two grand a year for dog care and food, and plan to spend a great deal of time with it.
Coco showed up on my porch because a family with two sons bought a puppy as a consumer product, and found out that dogs are a big hassle.
Re:Testimonial... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Your influence is the number one thing (Score:3, Insightful)
I agree with this. Setting an example is critical. Beyond that, here are a few other tips that may work, though I doubt there's any one-size-fits-all wisdom in this business:
Remember, though, that what is a "computer" is changing now. So the really hard question probably won't be something "neat and pretty" like whether to give them a big blobby box on a desk and a login to Google or Yahoo anyway. The real question will be whether to get the internet-enabled teddy bear, whether they should have a voice-response lightswitch, whether the games they play should be things you pay for or whether they should be funded by ads for toys or foods you don't want to be buying them, etc.
Re:social evolution (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Simple... (Score:4, Insightful)
Of course, the usual parental concerns of child safety, exposure to inappropriate content, etc., also come into play according to the parents' values.
Don't buy into the fear! (Score:5, Insightful)
My wife won't allow our daughter to play outside unless she can physically see her the whole time because she is sooo worried about "pedophiles". Totally insane.
Also, I've noticed that my kid has her own personality and interests. You will need to become interested in things that interest your child as well as sharing your interests with him or her.
Non-progressive future food (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Some thoughts (Score:3, Insightful)
It's obvious that computers are here to stay, if you keep them luddites until they are 15, they'll be somewhat crippled in their ability to use computers for the rest of their life, in the same way that non-native speakers are rarely able to achieve quite the same level of language proficiency and accent as natives. And if they do, it comes at the expense of great effort, equivalent to 3 years of passive exposure as kids.
Re:SimPark + the real thing (Score:2, Insightful)
Not really....I played games consoles all the time as a young lad. I didn't really start using a PC for anything more than games until I was...13, maybe. I'm now 20, at a university with a very good CS program, with hopes of going into the games industry. I don't really see why you shouldn't let them play consoles. They're fun, and in my case, inspired creativity.
Re:SimPark + the real thing (Score:3, Insightful)
Balance (Score:5, Insightful)
You put it right.
Balance
Balance is the answer... (Score:2, Insightful)
Rebecca's mom is the technology coordinator for our local elementary school and I'm a consultant and designer of electronic 'stuff'. So, Rebecca has technology all around her. Her first eye-hand coordination was inserting/removing a floppy disk. I wrote little routines which challenged her with words, phrases and other coputer stuff.
Now...the balance. I live on a 95 acre nature paradise. We have ponds, nature trails and animals galore. Rebecca gets as much...maybe more!...fun from tracking animals in the snow or fishing in the ponds or wading in the ditchs for minnows as she does driving my robotic vehicle or messing with my radio equipment. She's equally adept at calling CQ DX on 20 meters and paddling a canoe.
Balance is a must. Games...I don't care what platform...are NOT the same as getting dirty or falling down or throwing a ball or putting bate on a hook.
Take your kids to the park, to a playground or any outdoor area. Fly a kite, build a kite, walk in the rain. Smell the flowers; dig in the dirt.
Equal time for technology and 'realworld' stuff.
Anything less than balance between nature and technology is detremental and damned unfair to the child.
To quote Robert Heinlein: "A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.
As much time outside as in front of the technology...computers or radios.
Be there for them! (Score:5, Insightful)
I know.
I'm talking from experience. I grew up without having a father I could talk to...
Re:Your influence is the number one thing (Score:5, Insightful)
1) Buy a GPS. Go geocaching. Plenty of geekiness, plenty of outdoors. Can also use this on trips and to go exploring. Also could teach them to navigate/hike. (Cheaper alternative: Map and compass).
2) Take your kids to the local airport to watch planes take off and land. Plenty of geeky stuff but they're getting out and learning. (Could preface this with showing them how hard it is to fly real aircraft ala MSFS2004).
3) Research and buy a telescope or if you can't afford a decent one good binoculars. Again plenty of outdoors adventure, and lots of learning, while still being true to the geek in you
4) Buy them a microscope and go collecting specimens with them. Some time indoors and some time outdoors. A good mix.
5) Remote control cars/boats/planes are great hobbies that get you out and about.
6) Take them out on a boat. Teach them about different aspects of steering a small craft etc.
7) Birdwatching. Buy a good birdwatcher's book and get them to identify the local birds. Then plan trips to see others.
8) Take them to your local zoo. Don't just walk around like a schmuck. Get them to learn about animal behviours, identification, classification etc. If you can't afford the zoo or a local wildlife park, even a duck pond will do.
All of these things cost money, but then since when do gadgets not cost money???
Point is if you think the real world is boring compared to the computer, you just haven't been out in the real world enough. There is SO much out there. Most of the things you had as a kid are still out there.
Re:Your influence is the number one thing (Score:1, Insightful)
Oh well. I did try.
thoughts from a teacher (Score:3, Insightful)
Anyways, take them fishing, hunting, skiing, etc. Have them play sports, read books, write poetry. Whatever. Teach them to cook. The technology we need is an MRI in a hospital not an Xbox in the living room. My dad is 67 or something. He never touched a computer until he reitred a few years ago. Now, he uses the computer like a pro.
And since this is father's day (btw, I have three myself), the best you thing you can do is be their father. Whatever you have to do is not more important than them. I'm 36 and still fish with my old man. There's a reason. Buy him a hundred books, read a hundred books to him, take him to a hundred ball games, take him fishing a hundred times, play a hundred games of candyland (or whtever game), do a hundred other things a hndred times before you buy him a computer.
Re:SimPark + the real thing (Score:4, Insightful)
I couldn't agree more. If you want your kids to enjoy the out doors, then take them there. Go to the beach, go camping. Go play sports with them. And have a good time while you're doing it. Make that the reward, and the computer something to do in the meantime.
Re:get them outdoors (Score:2, Insightful)
That's a harsh statement. So does Mario sacrifice babies and kill bunny rabbits? Believe it or not, it's not very hard to moderate your kids PS2 time, just unhook the thing and take it with you when you think they've had enough. Its not like that takes a whole lot of effort.
"would you put a bag of candy in front of your 5 year old and expect them to eat a few pieces then quit because they know it's bad to eat too much?"
I see your point in this analogy, kids don't know whats best for them, but does that mean you never let them have any candy? Moderation is the key word here.
Re:Your influence is the number one thing (Score:4, Insightful)
10) Let them help you with home repairs.
11) Teach them how to raise cool plants
Re:Be there for them! (Score:2, Insightful)
Sometimes it is better that the parents split up.
It is much better for kids to have parents living separately if they argue with eachother all the time together.
But every kid should have contact with both parents though, at least when theres no good reason not to.
-M
Re:Your influence is the number one thing (Score:3, Insightful)