Xorg and Desktop Eyecandy 416
BonoLeBonobo writes "Xorg is going to include a new acceleration architecture which will help desktops to have better eye-candy effects thanks to a better XRender, thus composite, acceleration. Developped by Zack Rusin, a KDE and Qt developper, this new feature should be present in Xorg in September. Porting the existing drivers to this new acceleration architecture should be easy."
Desktop Eyecandy? (Score:5, Funny)
Even so,
No girls handy.
Fix your face,
Reveal you're randy.
Burma Shave.
GLocutus of Xorg (Score:4, Funny)
Re:GLocutus of Xorg (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Didn't want to fix existing bugs egh ? (Score:2, Funny)
*coughs loudly*
*is beaten by hired goons*
Sweet (Score:5, Funny)
Re:do i fail it? (Score:2, Funny)
misbehave
grunt and grumble
rant and rave?
shoot the brute some
Burma-Shave
... or just shoot him, period.
While you're at it, keep in mind that in Soviet Xorg, desktop displays you!
Re:GLocutus of Xorg (Score:3, Funny)
Move, Xorg
Move, Xorg
Re:Eye Candy V. Reliability (Score:3, Funny)
Huh? Are you saying that your wife is neither reliable nor faithful, or not eye candy? I don't get it.
Re:If you go by the past track record... (Score:3, Funny)
you misspelled odors.
Re:Didn't want to fix existing bugs egh ? (Score:2, Funny)
*there is no tao on slashdot*
*I watch birds fly past*
But have you tried reverting? (Score:3, Funny)
um... who's bright idea was it (Score:0, Funny)
2010 Newsflash: this just in... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Didn't want to fix existing bugs egh ? (Score:1, Funny)
Do as I say, not as I do
Re:Didn't want to fix existing bugs egh ? (Score:1, Funny)
Taking this to it's natural conclusion (Score:2, Funny)
Can you guess which one? (Score:3, Funny)
"porting", "drivers", "new architecture", "easy"...
[blows pitchpipe, clears throat]
One of these things is not like the others,
One of these things just doesn't belong...
Thank you, thank you - I love you all!