Trolltech Releases Qt 4.0 413
lypanov writes "Trolltech has released Qt 4.0 both under commercial and GPL licenses for X11, Mac OS X and MS Windows. It is the first time that a MS Windows GPL edition is available. To celebrate the release Trolltech employees have created a song and a music video (Bittorrent download, Ogg Theora version). Read the Qt 4 Overview and the online Qt Reference Documentation for more information. You can download Qt from ftp.trolltech.com or from one of its mirrors. Work on KDE 4 has already started with making a development branch of KDE compile and run with Qt 4."
Comment removed (Score:5, Informative)
Re:QT is a cutie (Score:3, Informative)
Is that kind of like Freshman Orientation? Show the objects around, get them used to the system, play volleyball with them, take them out behind the intramural fields and leave them to find their own way back...
Re:How does QT survive. (Score:5, Informative)
2) QT is GPL'd, not LGPL'd, so whoever wishes to use it in closed-source software must buy a license to do so. This means TrolTech can afford to continue developing it full time, while still getting it well-used in open-source projects.
3) The commercial license is very affordable.
4) QT is very cross-platform.
5) QT is very full featured, but still fast and light.
6) QT includes a very nice GUI designer.
BitTorrent Link - Corrupt Movie? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:How is this going to work for trolltech? (Score:5, Informative)
There are also Qtopia Pda and Phone Editions.
Re:QT is a cutie (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Wierd name (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.qtopia.net/modules/xoopsfaq/index.php?
From the FAQ (linked above) (Score:1, Informative)
As to being referred to as "Trolls", we don't mind. Trolls are something very Scandinavian, and in a way provides a title for all of us to share. It's kind of a bonding thing.
Re:How is this going to work for trolltech? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:KDE4 ? (Score:4, Informative)
What makes you think they won't? Migrating to a new version of the Qt framework doesn't require rewriting all of the underlying logic, therefore allowing for bug fixes in a major portion of application code. Not to mention, there are plans for another release [kde.org] in the 3.x series (development can happen in parallel). Also, you should be happy to know that the things you complain about, kicker and kdesktop, are slated to undergo a major overhaul [plasma.bddf.ca] for the KDE4 release.
Re:Compiler (Score:3, Informative)
Re:That doesn't work though (Score:2, Informative)
Re:mingw vs. cygwin on win32? (Score:4, Informative)
MingW is a native windows app that doesn't require the cygwin dll and creates exes that are standalone in windows.
Re:How to install this thing? (Score:3, Informative)
First, get and install mingw from http://www.mingw.org/download.shtml [mingw.org]
Second, from Trolltech, get and install "qt-win-opensource-desktop-4.0.0-mingw.exe", NOT "qt-win-opensource-desktop-4.0.0.zip".
Then, from the Start menu, run "Qt 4.0.0 Command Prompt" to get a DOS box with everything set up properly. Then play with the examples and demos, using qmake to create the makefiles.
Hope that helps!!
Re:international input (Score:1, Informative)
So: inputting accented characters does not have to be fixed, it has never been broken; you need to fix your system.
Try Ultimate++ as well (Score:2, Informative)
Ultimate++ [sf.net]
It is BSD licensed, it comes with IDE on both Linux and Win32, and it kicks ass for productivity.
See comparison with Qt [sourceforge.net].
Re:Compiler (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.trolltech.com/download/qt/windows.html [trolltech.com]
For the click-alergic people:
Please note that the Open Source Edition of Qt will support the MinGW compiler. Visual Studio support and integration is provided with the commercial Editions of Qt.
They also provide a package that will install the binaries, and tries to install the right version of MinGW. A Torrent is:
http://www.trolltech.com/torrents/qt-win-opensour
Re:QT: Good but Expensive (Score:2, Informative)
WxWidgets doesn't have Developers Fees, and uses the Native GUI on Windows, GTK, Mac, and even embedded systems (There's that crossplatform you claim only Qt has)...and All with standard C++ (No stupid Metacompilers needed). WxWidgets used with MinGW or Cygwin make for the ultimate competition, without the Qtlib nonsense. And considering WxWidgets uses STANDARD C++, I'd say it is more portable than Qtlib. Finally, compared to WxWidgets, I'd say that, yes, $5000 per developer is expensive for its type of toolkit.
I don't mind you FUDsters promoting Qtlib or Trolltech, but at least be truthful about it.
And, for your information, here's the info about WxWidgets differences...this might help you keep your facts straight: http://wiki.wxwidgets.org/wiki.pl?WxWidgets_Compa
Re:Bittorrent at its best (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Forced to GPL your code??? (Score:3, Informative)
No can do. GPL and BSD are incompatible according to our friendly psychos at FSF.
Only that archaic, ancient, malicious BSD with advertising clause.
The more modern variant is not, and it's 100% OK to use it in Qt programs, it's just that the recipient has to be able to distribute it under the GPL if he so wishes.