Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
GUI Software Linux

A Glimpse at the Linux Desktop of the Future 759

hisham writes "Every now and then we see articles pointing out "what's wrong with Linux on the desktop." This one gives a nice overview not only of the problems we all know, but also where to look for solutions (app dirs, smarter filesystems) and what's out there (projects trying to change the face of Linux, like Klik, Zero Install and GoboLinux). Still, it usually boils down to things that Mac OS X already has or that are/were touted for inclusion on MS Longhorn. Fortunately, the major desktops stopped playing catch and are focusing on forward-looking Linux projects, like KDE Plasma and Gnome Beagle. Interesting times ahead."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

A Glimpse at the Linux Desktop of the Future

Comments Filter:
  • Dear Linux (Score:5, Funny)

    by Seumas ( 6865 ) * on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @08:25AM (#12984239)
    Dear Linux,

    At first, I really admired your lofty goals and pure-hearted ambitions. You spoke of freedom. You spoke of choice. You spoke of a world without limits.

    But over the years, you have stagnated. Sure, you make a robust server and I'll always have a place in my heart (and my production racks) for you. But you have failed to thrive on my desktop.

    Why, just last year, I tried to get you to work with my 23" Apple Cinedisplay. I was ready to return to you full-time after a long desktop-linux hiatus, if only you could have displayed properly on that Cinedisplay without screwing up the resolution. I didn't want to run you in 1024x768 on a 1920x1600 screen. Nor did I want to run 1920x1600 worth of desktop in a 1024x768 resolution where I'd have to roll the mouse all over the place to screen-off to the rest of the desktop.

    And should I even mention the fiascos with various sound cards that you just didn't want to play nicely with? Or of the hardware that you were supposed to be "known-good" on that you chose not to work with at the most inopportune moments?

    After seven years of courting, you still didn't achieve desktop prominence in my life. In fact, the only switch you encouraged me to make was away from you and toward a platform that "just works".

    See, I've recently decided to shove you off the desk and turn you into a fileserver for my massive collection of porn, MP3s and ripped movies. Apple has found a way to give me a beautiful, slick, useful, enjoyable interface that makes everything you offer look like a rejected Fisher-Price prototype. And it slaps this onto a powerful BSD core. It's the best of both worlds. More, when I plug something into it - be it an iPod, 23" or 30" cinedisplay or anything else, it just works. I don't have to spend five days playing with LineModes in x86free.conf or massaging device drivers. I don't have to spend more time configuring and installing things than I do using them anymore.

    As I said, you'll always have a place in my production racks. There, we'll always be friends. But when it comes to my desk... I think we should really stop seeing each other. In fact, I already have. I've moved on. And my new desktop is more than you could ever hope to be. Maybe someday you'll grow up and realize that "free as in freedom" and "screw the corporates" rhetoric, nice as it is, doesn't justify sub-par computing.

    Maybe we can try again some day. For now, I need my space.
  • Choice (Score:3, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @08:32AM (#12984278)
    Linux...the CHOICE of a GNU generation!
  • by obender ( 546976 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @08:34AM (#12984289)
    you have to download quake_3_rh_8_i686_010203_glibc.bin, then do chmod ...

    If only all Linux applications were that simple to install.

  • by TheViffer ( 128272 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @08:36AM (#12984295)
    The executive summary of this goes something like this ..

    "X-Windows Sucks"

  • by Seumas ( 6865 ) * on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @08:39AM (#12984310)
    The average user would do just as well with Linux pre-loaded as they do with Windows pre-loaded.

    Until they had to install an application, wanted to play their favorite videogame or upgrade their hardware.

    "Hi grandma. You did what? You bought Quicken at OfficeMax today? Um... You do realize that doesn't work on linux don't you? No, I'm sorry grandma, that only works on a PC or a Macintosh. No, you totally wasted your money. But it's okay, you can totally get the same kind of program for free on linux! You just have to download it and install it. Well, your bank probably won't support it and it probably won't even connect to your bank and you'll have to do everything manually, but... it's free! . . . . Okay, grandma. You have to su to root and then apt-get update; apt-get upgrade. But first, make sure to edit your apt.sources file to point to the security branch so you'll recieve all of those updates. Okay, done? Good. Alright, now you wanted to get an account ledger application to track your banking, right? Okay, apt-get install aptitude and then run aptitude from the command line. After it loads up, start scrolling through the list of applications until you find something that sounds like it will do what you want. Oh - found one? Awesome, grandma! Now you need to press + and then g and g again . . . . . . . Huh? Wait, what'd it say? . . . . Oh, crap. No, apparently one of the dependancies didn't update properly. Okay, we need to remove and purge it and start all over again. Do you know how to use dpkg grandma?"
  • by DrSkwid ( 118965 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @08:49AM (#12984375) Journal
    My plan9 desktop [proweb.co.uk], (at 50% zoom) the open window is a vnc to my X desktop with 9wm running.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @08:53AM (#12984393)
    No, it's a community-based version of FraggleLinux.
  • by tourvil ( 103765 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @09:28AM (#12984614)
    On the other hand, I've had to reinstall Windows 3x this last year...

    Well there's your problem! All the Windows 3.x versions sucked! Get with the times and upgrade! ;)

  • by Andrewkov ( 140579 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @09:51AM (#12984777)
    Here's a summary of Slashdot headlines over the past few years:

    1995: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    1996: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    1997: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    1998: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    1999: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    2000: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    2001: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    2002: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    2003: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    2004: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!
    2005: Linux will be ready for the desktop next year!

    I really think 2006 will be our breakthrough year!
  • by Geek of Tech ( 678002 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @10:18AM (#12985001) Homepage Journal
    >>Last thing I want to do is type into google "How do I make my monitor work pretty please"... I think in this case your problem isn't a lack of good, easy documentation, but rather a lack of sensability using Google....
  • by Durzel ( 137902 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @11:59AM (#12985913) Homepage
    Thanks for the Quake3-HOWTO, you saved me a few hours of head scratching and searching for obscure pages on Google.
  • by Ripplet ( 591094 ) on Tuesday July 05, 2005 @02:50PM (#12987574)
    >omgwtfbbqlol

    Hey, like it, I must remember that one...

Any circuit design must contain at least one part which is obsolete, two parts which are unobtainable, and three parts which are still under development.

Working...