Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Government Politics

U.N. To Govern Internet? 1197

Falmarian writes "Apparently the rest of the world isn't happy about the US franchise on internet governance. A news.com article discusses the possibility that the U.N. will make a bid for control of such governing functions as assigning TLDs and IPs." From the article: "At issue is who decides key questions like adding new top-level domains, assigning chunks of numeric Internet addresses, and operating the root servers that keep the Net humming. Other suggested responsibilities for this new organization include Internet surveillance, 'consumer protection,' and perhaps even the power to tax domain names to pay for 'universal access.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

U.N. To Govern Internet?

Comments Filter:
  • by Spamicles ( 731847 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:18PM (#13063762)
    maybe they can hire Al Gore to whip up something new for international use.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:19PM (#13063776)
    Given the UN's proven track record of success, efficiency and effeciveness, I don't see how anyone could be against this.
  • by gods_design ( 266291 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:21PM (#13063802) Homepage Journal
    This way when there is a dispute over ip addressing UN peace keepers can just observe the dispute while the parties kill each other...
  • by mbrewthx ( 693182 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:21PM (#13063803)
    Brought to by the same people who brought you Oil for Food,
  • Re:Yuk (Score:5, Funny)

    by Slugster ( 635830 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:23PM (#13063831)
    Come on now, be civil. The internet belongs to the world. It's only fair that 60% of the TLD servers are in the world's poorest countries, and they charge $1 and take 15 minutes to do a lookup....
  • Great (Score:1, Funny)

    by brucem4179 ( 898273 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:27PM (#13063875)
    This has all the markings of a disaster. Either a) Leave it with the US and watch countries like China break away and leave us with good and bad "internets". Or b) Give it to the UN, the very people who couldn't organise a piss up in a brewery.
  • by wardk ( 3037 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:27PM (#13063878) Journal
    so if the UN runs the internet, I suppose that attacks against 3rd world computers will be ignored until millions of computers are slag. then when they do intervene, it will be half-hearted with the help unable to actually help, just stand around watching shit burn.

  • by WidescreenFreak ( 830043 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:28PM (#13063891) Homepage Journal
    Careful! This is Slashdot! You need to specify when there is sarcasm in a statement or risk getting megatively modded by the oblivious. But to continue your statement, I can't wait to read about the "IP for Food" scandal in the next few years.
  • by KarmaMB84 ( 743001 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:30PM (#13063923)
    And the British practically belong to us, so what's your point?
  • by drooling-dog ( 189103 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:30PM (#13063925)
    maybe they can hire Al Gore to whip up something new for international use.

    Since he's the main guy behind funding it with U.S. tax dollars, that would be more of an argument for keeping things as they are...

  • by robocrop ( 830352 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:31PM (#13063928)
    Resolution 30357A - Illegal File Traders:

    We will give you 1 year to take down your website, before 'more drastic' measures will be taken.

    One year later ...

    Resolution 30357B - Illegal File Traders:

    Oh, did we say one year? We meant two. Take two years. But take it down! Don't make us unleash the fury!

    Two years later ...

    Resolution 30357C - Illegal File Traders:

    We at the UN can't help but notice that you haven't taken your site down. We strongly disapprove of your actions. So much so that we're giving you three more years to do it. But you'd better believe that when those three years are up it's clobbering time. Seriously.

    Three years later ...

    Resolution 30357D - Illegal File Traders:

    It seems you are still running your illegal website. We downloaded several Chingy tunes today (thanks for the UN discount!). But you seriously need to take that site down. Seriously. To show you how serious we are, we're going to start a plan of denying aid to people not in any way affiliated with you. Yes we know this won't affect on you personally, but it makes us look like bad-asses. Five more years! That's all we can give you. Then out come the meat hammers!

    Five years later ...

    Resolution 30357E - Illegal File Traders
    - Rider A: Condemnation of Israel for refusing to just fucking disappear like the Mayans
    - Rider B: Pay-raise and trips to Disneyland!

    Maybe it's us. Are we doing something wrong? Is there something we could give you to make you take that site down? Because, seriously, we're all pussies here at the UN and don't want to do anything drastic like follow through on our empty resolution statements. So why don't we go ahead and give you as many years as you like to take that site down. Just keep those kickbacks coming! And remember, we are the world's last resort for justice!

  • Re:french (Score:2, Funny)

    by CaptainFork ( 865941 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:34PM (#13063977)
    L'ser
  • Re:The UN (Score:0, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:42PM (#13064072)
    Do you mean the UN that thought that invading Iraq wasn't justified? That more time was needed to establish the existence of WMDs? Clearly an organisation that couldn't make a good decision to save itself. Oh, wait...
  • by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:49PM (#13064166)
    c:\> ping www.google.com
    pinging 64.36.21.34 ...
    network U.N.-reachable

    sorry... couldn't resist
  • Re:Huh? (Score:1, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:52PM (#13064208)
    Uh...no... they would invade switzerland, or wherever the governing body was, fail to do anything about the internet situation because they have bad intelligence that does not tell them how the network is administered, but they would succeed in killing hundreds of women and children and we would probably successfully end Switzerlands neutrality forever.

    Of course, I think they will find that the US soldiers will get their asses kicked by Swiss women and children, but with sheer numbers we will manage to massacre some of those dangerous women and children.

    heh... should be a historical sub plot in a william gibson novel explaining why swiozerland got nuked...
  • by CosmeticLobotamy ( 155360 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:53PM (#13064218)
    Resolution 30357F

    The US is making us do this again. Sorry. So, *sigh*, this is probably your last warning. First of all, thanks for taking that copy of Herbie: Fully Loaded off your site. But if you don't provide proof that you're not operating another server somewhere in some way we can't detect, we're going to come get you.
  • by sheldon ( 2322 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @12:53PM (#13064221)
    NO! NOT THE DUTCH!

    ANYBODY BUT THE DUTCH!

    Next thing you know, the streets of the internet will be littered with sites trying to sell sex and drugs.
  • by HD Webdev ( 247266 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @01:05PM (#13064370) Homepage Journal
    so if the UN runs the internet, I suppose that attacks against 3rd world computers will be ignored until millions of computers are slag. then when they do intervene, it will be half-hearted with the help unable to actually help, just stand around watching shit burn.

    I see your point. The UN will act just like Microsoft does now.
  • by Tromeo ( 216969 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @01:26PM (#13064646)
    so we should control it.

    If you other countries would just have better politicians...
  • by lophophore ( 4087 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @01:52PM (#13064982) Homepage
    "European invented HTTP"

    Since when is Tim Berners-Lee a European?

    The man is British!

  • Re:Yuk (Score:5, Funny)

    by Cro Magnon ( 467622 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @01:54PM (#13065021) Homepage Journal
    The starving people blame the despotic dictators.


    But not to their faces.
  • by hobbesx ( 259250 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @02:08PM (#13065257)
    Hmmm... Insightful, polite, open to suggestion... Are you Canadian? :D
  • Re:Yuk (Score:2, Funny)

    by darkera ( 805654 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @04:11PM (#13066521)
    Al Gore is British?
  • Re:Yuk (Score:2, Funny)

    by letxa2000 ( 215841 ) on Thursday July 14, 2005 @06:55PM (#13067998)
    5. Goto 2
    6. ???
    7. Africans profit when the stack overflows.

    The stack will only overflow if you relace "5. Goto 2" with "5. GOSUBB> 2".

Solutions are obvious if one only has the optical power to observe them over the horizon. -- K.A. Arsdall

Working...