The Future of Firefox 399
sebFlyte writes "As Firefox moves swiftly towards 1.1 and Internet Explorer keeps trundling towards IE7, ZDNet UK has an interesting set of articles about Mozilla. Among other things, they look at the history of Firefox all the way from the pre-phoenix days, and have an interview with chief evangelist Asa Dotzler looking at what has driven the browsers success and why he thinks the release of IE7 will cause a massive boost in the uptake of Firefox."
and... (Score:4, Informative)
Re:firefox (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Main advantage (Score:5, Informative)
Given that the issue in question also occurs in IE, Safari, and any other browser with a flash plugin regardless of OS I'd guess that this is not a browser bug.
My guess is that it's a race condition inside the Flash code itself. It doesn't appear on all systems, even if they are running the same OS/browser/flash revision (and viewing the same content).
At least with Firefox you can install Flashblock [mozdev.org] and not be annoyed by CPU gobbling flash unless you really want it.
Re:firefox (Score:3, Informative)
php asp asp.net perl or java, your web app has no excuse to not support all compliant browsers.
code to real standards and spend another 10 minutes testing, anything less is plain lazy.
Re:Security (Score:2, Informative)
But more importantly than that, firefox holes have always been fixed within days, if not the day of. With MS you have to wait for the second tuesday to get your windows update. What will you do when an exploit is discovered the day after that?
Re:Dicey logic? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:boost leads to more exploits (Score:2, Informative)
The Future of Firefox is another 5 MB download... (Score:5, Informative)
Coding misstep forces new Firefox release
http://news.com.com/Coding+misstep+forces+new+Fir
well....at least we have extensions.... here's my list:
TextZoom [cosmicat.com] - because I'm blind as a bat
Adblock [mozdev.org] - use with Filterset.G from http://www.pierceive.com [pierceive.com]
Session Saver [extensionsmirror.nl] - saves tab sessions _when_ firefox crashes
Web Developer [mozdev.org] - lot of web dev options
IE View [mozdev.org] - click to view in IE
Target Alert [bolinfest.com] - let's me know what I'm clicking on
ForecastFox [mozdev.org] - show forecast
FindBar Switch [danakil.free.fr] - makes the find bar toogle hide/un-hide with CTRL+F
Download Statusbar [mozdev.org] - much better than the download window/popup
SpellBound [sourceforge.net] - because my spelling sux
Wrong! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:unhappy with Firefox 1.x (Score:1, Informative)
i think the win32 version of firefox is faster than on linux
Re:Security (Score:4, Informative)
Using the word exploits seems to indicate that there are malicious websites out there taking advantage of a security hole. There may very well be, I just don't remember hearing about it.
Behind the scenes article (Score:1, Informative)
http://insight.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,39020463,39
Re:boost leads to more exploits (Score:3, Informative)
Re:unhappy with Firefox 1.x (Score:4, Informative)
kashani
Re:Extension security (Score:2, Informative)
Also, it isn't installed by default you know. I consider myself to be a power user and I've been running Firefox since version
Re:1.0.5 Still Not Auto-updating! (Score:3, Informative)
false (Score:3, Informative)
Huh, what the fuck? IE is a process and it runs with users' permissions. It's just not possible to gain administrative privileges through IE just because there's no part of IE running with administrator privileges
I'm tired of all that "IE is integrated with the OS" bullshit. Microsoft said that because otherwise they'd have to remove IE from windows and they've enought money to make the judgue believe that. IE is integrated in the "active desktop", the explorer or the help reader or msn messenger, but that does NOT mean it's integrated in the "os" in the real sense. It's integrated in the OS if you call "OS" to explorer.exe, but it is certainly not integrated in ej: the kernel or the libraries implementing the win32 API. And the programs which use it (explorer, etc) use it as a com object, ie: it's not really "tightly integrated"
Re:firefox breaks my laptop's ability to wake up (Score:1, Informative)
1) type about:config in the location bar (and hit enter)
2) Right click on any key, then click New, Integer
3) The name will be browser.cache.memory.capacity
4) The value will be the size, in kB, of Firefox's memory cache. I recommend 16 MB (16384), but you may want more or less, depending on how much ram you have.
5) Restart the browser and try it out
Re:Women in OSS (Score:3, Informative)
Why is this seen as a problem.
You might begin by asking how many women use open source software, make purchasing decisions or have shown the slightest interest in Linux. If you don't know the answers to these questions, or if 50% of the market is indifferent to your product and alienated from its developers, I'd say you have a problem.
Re:I'm all for MS bashing, but... (Score:2, Informative)
Now, there are rumours [mozilla.org] of an imminent update to fix coding problems.
When was the last release of MS IE?
There does appear to be a speed difference.
Re:boost leads to more exploits (Score:3, Informative)
No, they did not, quite the opposite, they tricked them into doing the work for free.
MS contracted Spyglass to write IE from Mosaic but the payment was to be $5.00 for every copy of IE _sold_. When they 'gave it away' they did not need to pay Spyglass anything.
Spyglass sued and lost. MS insisted that it was never 'sold' even when it was an unremovable part of Windows that was sold.
Re:Asa's blowing smoke (Score:1, Informative)