Google Instant Messenger all Rumor 265
Jbravo writes "Search, blogging, maps, photos, email, and now a portal, Google has kept adding to their array of services. Is an instant messenger next for Google? Most recently Google has been said to be buying out a company called Meetroduction, LLC for their instant messenger Meetro. So, is it true? Is Google writing the check now? Well, after a chat with Paul Bragiel, CEO of Meetroduction, the word is not right now. He called the whole story 'rumors.'"
Rumors and denials (Score:4, Insightful)
Too many already (Score:5, Insightful)
As much as it would be cool... (Score:3, Insightful)
I'll change in a second -- and tell all of my friends to change -- if, somehow, it just blows everything else out of the water. This, however, seems unlikely.
The way it usually works.... (Score:2, Insightful)
"Rumours" is not a denial. (Score:5, Insightful)
If the guy had said "It's just rumours and there is absolutely no truth in it" that would be one thing. Just saying "it's a rumour" is the polite equivalent of "no comment".
I would imagine that Paul Bragiel and his company is quite enjoying the attention, so it's not in his interests to decisively quash these rumours, so he's left things a little ambiguous.
Google buying its technology? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Too many already (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Too many already (Score:2, Insightful)
But hey, I'm sure that you've already earned yourself some "Insightful" points from someone, so mission accomplished.
Re:Google buying its technology? (Score:4, Insightful)
Google hasn't been "evil" with their purchases. In fact, pretty much everything they bought they starting giving away for free.
Re:Hello? (Score:3, Insightful)
Google already has an instant messenger. "Hello" is a product that they received along with Picasa.
right move (Score:2, Insightful)
Why not? (Score:2, Insightful)
Im still waiting for google calendar, theres just no good calander/task program thats remote, syncable, and cross-platform, unless im missing something..
Re:Too many already (Score:5, Insightful)
IRC is extendable enough that you can add it, and a few clients have tried in the past(VIRC), but theyre just not standardized enough to rely on.
Tis a shame too If someone made a nice client that actually offered these features it'd save me and my friends a lot of time/effort having to switch between irc/aim depending on what is needed. I of course prefer irc when possible, but if I have a screenshot in my buffer, I'd rather click direct connect and right click -> paste picture than open ms paint, paste, save to disk,
Re:How about fixing GMail first? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The future is Google (Score:5, Insightful)
Actually, many people are slowly finding they need 10 times the functionality that the Windows variants provide. That's why other OS's exist and will continue to exist. Realize that functionality can be measured in many ways - freedom isn't free, for one thing - it requires work, whether in a democracy or an effort to have free (from control by others) software.
Google is lead by people smart enough to recognize that Microsoft views them as a threat, and so, by fiat, Microsoft is a threat to Google. A world in which Google did not have to worry about loss of search effort (and hence loss of eyeballs to the advertising revenue they capture) to Microsoft or to others is a world in which Google makes more money. A weaker Microsoft that would have to make decisions on concentrating its resources on its bread-and-butter Office (threatened by OpenOffice, for one), and on its OS, which is its starting point for its huge market capitalization, is a world in which Microsoft is not gaining revenue from search, or from IM, etc.
IMO, Google could do far worse than to figure out how to make Firefox even more useful and how to make Gaim even more useful, and how to make Sunbird a useful product, and how to make a free Exchange-like product that tied 'em all together, and acted as a chat server, and so on, and to give those things away, and encourage their use. Less Microsoft presence in those areas means a retrenched Microsoft not dipping into the search engine advertising revenue stream.
Revenue Source? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:The future is Google (Score:5, Insightful)
No. geeks may be "slowly finding" this, but the "average user" is not. The "average user" has and continues to have a very well defined profile of things that they do. Games, image management, email, IM. The "average user" has no clue about much of what is discussed at Slashdot, and even less interest.
Re:Perhaps not the right approach for the market (Score:1, Insightful)
"People Won't Come" (Score:2, Insightful)
Think of the possibilities though. The ability to google any text someone sends you. Online and offline chat (ala ICQ) via Gmail (maybe set it up so that if you're offline and someone tries to send you a message its forwarded to your Gmail account or something). They could do all sorts of fun stuff.
Think *BROWSER-BASED* IM (Score:2, Insightful)
That's what GMail does today, so where's the weak link? IM, where people do communicate a lot of information which gets lost to those who don't keep logs. There's already a very usable Webmessenger for MSN. Having this server-based means the log are available from anywhere. Heck, just getting rid of having a separate e-mail and IM program filling up my RAM my well be worth it.
IM is all well and good, but ... (Score:2, Insightful)
Google needs focus. I'd really rather they stayed best at everything they choose to do, rather than attack in all directions.
Re:AJAX? Are you crazy? (Score:3, Insightful)
I just think it makes a lot more sense to keep applications that require online presence... online!