IBM Donates Code to Firefox 355
OS24Ever writes "Internetnews.com is reporting that IBM has donated new DHTML code to the Mozilla foundation specifically targeted as accessability and rich interactive applications (RIA). These new features are expected to be in the next major update of Firefox (v1.5). Is this the first OSS application to get RIA/DHTML support for accessability? I would think this could open some doors for Firefox to replace IE in many Windows environments."
To IBM (Score:5, Insightful)
-Random Person.
Not unless (Score:2, Insightful)
Not unless XML Islands are suddenly implemented.
Re:One step forward... (Score:2, Insightful)
extensions (Score:1, Insightful)
IBM == Good code. (Score:5, Insightful)
Dumb & Dumber (Score:0, Insightful)
Why on Earth would you think that? Have you heard anyone shouting for RIA support. I'd never even heard of RIA, prior to this article and I definitely haven't missed it.
MS IE maintains it's stonghold because most websites are built for it specifically. Additionally, many many applications are build for IE exclusively.
Firefox is not being held back by the lack of RIA. It is being held back by the sheer dominance of IE and that dominance continues to grow. While the community pats themselves on the back and congratulates themselves about 80 million downloads, they turn a blind eye to the fact that there have been 10 releases so there are actually only 10 million copies of Firefox in use. the other 70 million have been overwritten by newer releases.
Re:But why did they do this? (Score:3, Insightful)
Anyone have a non-buzzword version? (Score:5, Insightful)
I would expect this code actually does something, but the article is so vague I'm not really sure what. What's an example of something that does not work now that will work after this code is integrated and released?
(Preferably from someone who actually knows; I could make stuff up based on the article too, like this: "Before, if you set the ALT attribute on a dynamically-generated IMG tag, the screen-readers couldn't pick it up. Now they can." But I'm not sure if that's what they mean; that's just my plausible interpretation of the buzzword soup that I'm not very confident in, as I would have thought that works fine now....)
This is great (Score:2, Insightful)
but seriously, keep buying IBM and support OSS.
Re:Maybe. (Score:5, Insightful)
Even if the user-base hit a plateau already and everyone that wants Firefox, has it, this is article talks about providing accesability to a whole new audience. Being the first in the field does give one an advantage when the two biggest competitors are commercial (Opera) and slower than waiting for a new IE (uh...IE).
I know there are others, but when these are the three biggest players, Firefox stands to gain a good deal of respect in the accesability crowd if they pull this off with IBM.
By all means, it won't topple IE, but providing a good set of features to those with disabilities could actually see Firefox instituted in more public terminal situations like schools, libraries and such.
Besides, OSS tends to be pretty stubborn in the fact that the developers usually stop for nothing short of complete bankruptcy
Re:But why did they do this? (Score:3, Insightful)
Even if it's only one program out of a hundred, IBM has nothing to lose by helping the projects that help their systems.
Re:IBM == Good code. (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm curious on what possible motives IBM would have for doing this. I mean, they're a business, there to make money and all. How does this help them in the short or long run?
This is a maneuver against Microsoft. IE gives Microsoft considerable influence over application creation and hosting tools. By keeping the browser independent, IBM can push Web Sphere and other tools more effectively. The Fortune 500 is the target, fortunately, we can all benefit from their contribution.
As you've guessed, IBM's promotion of open source is not altruistic.
Re:Maybe. (Score:5, Insightful)
You know, code that will help make Flash and its lookalikes accessible to people who maybe can't see or hear?
That's most likely what the poster of the story intended when he/she speaked of being able to "replace IE in many Windows environments."
Re:IBM == Good code. (Score:4, Insightful)
A universal client for their dhtml applications? That is my guess
Firefox works on many OSes, which is their strength. As more and mroe is moving to the web platform, IBM sees this as a easy way to strengthen their position in the web-app market.
Re:Not unless (Score:3, Insightful)
Wild Guess (Score:3, Insightful)
It may help them sell more servers and services?
Wild guess, but custom web-based apps are pretty popular in mega-corps. Mega-corps have to support a wide variety of users, including those with accessibility needs. Making Firefox more accessible in DHTML areas means they could potentially sell more servers and services to better support the needs of mega-corps.
?
Re:Dumb & Dumber (Score:3, Insightful)
Obviously this requires not to rely on ActiveX and make more use of compliant DHTML/CSS. Is not pretty but if it's done once it can be replicated with less effort.
Benefits: you make access to your website a non-issue and end up with a better designed system.
Web designers take shortcuts/are lazy and that's why they stick with IE. But that will come to bite them in the A$$ with the next release of IE.
Major update? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:DHTML = CSS Filters? (Score:2, Insightful)
One hell of a move (Score:4, Insightful)
The code checks one box that IE doesn't have checked - Accessibilty for rich internet apps.
This is a carefully designed move to further boost Firefox. It's an excellent reason to give for switching, especially at government facilities.
Re:I doubt it (Score:2, Insightful)
How about if, after using a modern browser for a few days, the very thought of using IE makes a user's skin crawl and they have to suppress the urge to go take a shower? Oh, wait, that was four years ago, practically forever in internet time, and ad interim IE is the only major browser that has not improved its interface at all.
> and it has to be brought to the attention of
> the public at large
I'm pretty sure that has happened now. My dad, who only knows the difference between the web and email if you explain it three times slowly, approached *me* to ask if he could get "Mozilla Foxfire". He heard about it on a discussion forum dedicated to his hobby (which is not technical in nature and mostly popular with retired people), heard a description of tabbed browsing, and wanted it. He also wanted to download some smileys. This is *not* the esoteric stuff of the techno-elite geek only.
My sister, an elementary school teacher, said that the computers in the schools were "unusable" for the internet, because they use IE. (It was mostly the constant popups she was talking about; they way she described it, I assume they had accumulated some adware that made matters worse than the sites they were visiting intended -- but she didn't know that; she just knew she had to close six windows every time she clicked anything.)
Yes, there are still a lot of people using IE, but what they need more than anything at this point is for a geek with some spare time to service their computers for them: run a spyware check, install Firefox, clean the 8+ obsolete IM clients they don't use anymore out of the Run registry keys, uninstall all the old versions of AOL and the Earthlink Toolbar they haven't used in a couple of years, and, you know, just generally fix the computer up so it works better. Do it for your non-techie friends when you get a chance. They'll thank you. And if there's a Firefox icon on the desktop where the e used to be, they'll use Firefox -- and they'll like it.
Re:Sounds like . . (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Maybe. (Score:4, Insightful)
These are better... Really. [anybrowser.org]