Enlightenment DR17 On the Linux Desktop 356
StephenJoiner writes "There's a new review on Mad Penguin of the latest VectorLinux release, which includes the in-development Enlightenment DR17 desktop. As far as I know, this is the first time DR17 has appeared on a production desktop... even as a "technology preview". All I have to say is Enlightenment on VectorLinux is absolutely off the scale." Enlightenment was in Slashdot news earlier for both the involvement with Elive and their use of Epeg bits to deal with thumbnailing.
Ok.. (Score:5, Informative)
Ubuntu + E17 (Score:5, Informative)
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=54476 [ubuntuforums.org]
Fedora & E17 (Score:5, Informative)
Stable, beautiful.... (Score:5, Informative)
Still, it's lightweight, beautiful, features real transparency, and is unusually stable for being in heavy development.
Re:Ubuntu + E17 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu + E17 (Score:5, Informative)
Re:LiveCD (Score:3, Informative)
Got it on FreeBSD (Score:4, Informative)
I highly recommend it. Can't wait for the full release (not least because I haven't bothered to compile the extra utils).
Gentoo has had it for months (Score:5, Informative)
Re:LiveCD (Score:5, Informative)
There's a torrent for it also: http://torrents.osdir.com/index.php?view=Elive%20
Speak for yourself (Score:1, Informative)
Sorry, but styles can't affect functionality [or] simplicity. If I want the eyecandy (KDE, Gnome, Enlightenment...), I can choose it. If I just want a screen to open a bunch of terminals in it (Ratpoison anyone?) I can have it too. It's called "option", and it's a blessing.
Re:Vapourware (Score:5, Informative)
Actually if you look on Rasterman.com, he does a few comparisons of different stock window managers using a script that he wrote, and E-17 kills.
http://www.rasterman.com/index.php?page=News Scroll down to the post "E17 is being Optimized"
I'm particularly fond of the way the pager behaves. I like being able to drag and drop iconified windows between desktops. Although this works in Gnome, it will place the window in the new desktop at the same coordinates it was in the old one. With the pager in E, you can actually *place* the window within the pager...
Looks/works great on Ubuntu (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Stable, beautiful.... (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Vapourware (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Not trying to start a flame war (honest)... (Score:1, Informative)
Enlightenment has been out longer than Mac OS X and has had an interface similar to the dock. So Apple may have copied Enlightenment, not the other way around.
I'm not trying to trumpet OS X...yeah the fuck right, you freakin' karma whore.
Re:Speedy Enlightenment? (Score:3, Informative)
First, Gnome Terminal is dog slow and fat-ass. I never use it because it's such a resource drain. I use Eterm 0.9.3 actually and with the exception of it not liking some UTF-8, it works great. It takes up about 1/6 of the resources GT does.
Second, are you using the nv (Open Source) driver or the nVidia (Proprietary) driver? I've noticed the nv driver is incredibly slow compared to the nVidia driver, especially dragging windows around. I don't see pixels update, but refresh goes to about 1fps when I'm dragging Eterm windows around. With the nVidia driver, it's smooth and slick, but it randomly locks up the machine if you have RenderAccel turned on.
Re:DR17? (Score:2, Informative)
The last release of Enlightenment [wikipedia.org](an XWindows windows manager) was 0.16, and it used to be the default window manager for GNOME. It was released in 2000 (last stable) and an update was released December of last year (2004).
DR17 indicates it is a development release (i.e. not advisable to use in a production machine) of the next version (0.17, or "17" for short). There are some very novel things in it, and all-in-all, it is a very powerful engine. See the ./ article [slashdot.org] for interesting, albeit self-described, forward thinking of the project.
The best way to run E17 (Score:5, Informative)
If you want the full effect you have to go into Gconf and tell nautilus to not draw the desktop, but otherwise it works pretty good. I have found that overall its faster than Metacity, and is more stable with xcompmgr. I just wish I could find another way to task switch in E17 that is not alt-tab, and I hope that one day E17 will conform to Freedesktop standards so I can use Kompose with it!
Re:Ubuntu + E17 (Score:5, Informative)
And where are they? It's there, it's usable, and I'm loving it. Obviously, it is also still in-development, but aside from the total lack of configurability by GUI or textfile--nearly everything must be configured via obscure, undocumented enlightenment_remote commands (thank goodness for the included zsh completion script!)--once you've managed to configure it, it's completely usable. I was extremely impressed, and will be back to using Enlightenment from here on out.
For those of you who prefer it, another thing I found right after installing was this great page [nus.edu.sg], which has binaries and source rpms of CVS snapshots, and includes apt and yum repositories! Very nice! I wrote a script to install the whole she-bang from CVS a long time ago, but this would be an even easier way to keep tabs on the development progress, if you use a distro that supports rpm.
----
Personal recommendations:
I like the engage launcher/tray better than the default ibar. You can enable it as a module with these commands: I also edited the data/themes/module/images/bg_[hv].png files in the engage source before compiling to be completely transparent (instead of 65% opaque) to remove the (in my opinion) ugly background rectangle on my engage bar. I think get-e.org had another solution for this which involved editing the module.ecj file, instead, which probably would have been easier had I known to do it before I did the install. >8)
Re:The best way to run E17 (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Enlightenment version numbering.... (Score:4, Informative)
The next version will be 0.17, so its called DR17.
Re:Stable, beautiful.... (Score:5, Informative)
Having said that, I've been using E17 on and off for about a year, and although I still wouldn't qualify myself able to comment on its stability, I will say this:
It feels solid. You know how you can just feel the difference? Like when you first tried OS/2 and compared it to Win 3.1... you didn't exactly know why, but you knew it was rock solid.
That's the way E17 feels.
I haven't had it crash on me, but I certainly wouldn't suggest people rush out to start using it as their main WM. It's just not ready yet. There are tons of features that still need to be implemented before it's usuable full time.
I look forward to it though, for those who like the E style, it's going to be awesome!
Re:Looks/works great on Ubuntu (Score:3, Informative)
deb http://ubuntu.nooms.de/ [nooms.de] hoary/
To get it to work I had to comment out the Universe line.
Re: Multiple desktops for WinXP (Score:3, Informative)
Re:StyleXP (Score:2, Informative)
However, programs aren't expecting windows to have capabilities like that, so it's a bit glitchy, sometimes, haha
That said, Every Linux WM/DE that I've used has implemented these capabilities better.
Re:StyleXP (Score:2, Informative)
Best window manager ever. (Score:3, Informative)
Oooh, just like you've been able to do in fvwm for 10+ years now.
The E pager is very nice and I hope everything is just as good. It's been a long time since I've used fvwm, just as it had been a long time since I used E. I like E's real division between virtual desktops and screens, so you can have multiple pagers in E each with it's own desktop with multiple screens. I also like being able to drag and drop between the different pagers.
E also gets minimized viewers right too. It draws a thumbnail or an icon and grows to accommodate what you have open or scrolls, your choice. You can also turn off the borders, so nothing but the icon or thumbnail gets in front of your background image.
Theme transparency already rocks. Add that to animated backgrounds and you have something unmatched in the commercial world.
Oh, and if you look at his benchmark results, fvwm is faster than E17 out of the box, too.
Like this benchmark [madpenguin.org]?
It looks a little funny to me to, but it's a benchmark with both window managers on it.
Re:Gentoo has had it for months (Score:4, Informative)
i really wanted to give it a try.
i now run this on a fairly regular basis:
i've been happily using e17 for a couple months, keeping up with all the major CVS changes. (of course, i'm subscribed to the CVS list so i can keep track of it all.)
Re:Stable, beautiful.... (Score:4, Informative)
there is a menu editor. entangle.
also, you can edit the menu itself in ~/.e/e/applications/ wherein you can find engage's sticky icons, your icon bar, startup apps, apps to run on restart, as well as your favorites menu.
Re:Tabs (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Cairo (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Fedora & E17 (Score:3, Informative)
got good news for you then! window memory was implemented a couple of weeks ago. as were a lot of other must-have features from e16.
Re:Ubuntu + E17 (Score:4, Informative)
i take a bit of a different tact. i keep both the ibar and engage around. i settled on this for my normal configuration:
and i have a unique background image on each desktop, including Firefoxy and iCandy from ToyboxArts.Re:Got it on FreeBSD (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ubuntu + E17 (Score:3, Informative)
Looks prettier. And can run faster (I know it sounds like I'm lying, but I'm not). Its amazing. Its just kinda harder to use.
VectorLinux BitTorrent (Score:2, Informative)