Microsoft to Stop Releasing Services for Unix 296
lilrowdy18 writes "According to a recent article, Microsoft will stop releasing any new versions of Services for Unix. SFU 3.5 will continue to be supported until 2011 and will have extended support until 2014. From what the article hints at, Microsoft wants Unix interoperability integrated into the OS. Microsoft says that this integration couldn't be done with past architectures."
Microsoft's answer to UNIX (Score:5, Funny)
BSD isn't dying! (Score:4, Funny)
Integrated (Score:5, Funny)
Dave
Re:Integrated (Score:5, Funny)
It's about time UNIX benefitted from Microsoft's years of marketing experience...
Perhaps they should change the name now, too? (Score:5, Funny)
Probably a good thing (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Microsoft's answer to UNIX (Score:2, Funny)
I am sure this was ment to be
New kernel (Score:4, Funny)
Because, unbeknownced to the world, Microsoft is using a BSD kernel in Vista.
Use Cygwin.
I'd never have guessed (Score:1, Funny)
Fancy that.
Re:Microsoft's answer to UNIX (Score:3, Funny)
You misspelled "VMS." (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Microsoft's answer to UNIX (Score:2, Funny)
Somebody call Darl! (Score:2, Funny)
Somebody tell SCO!
Re:Microsoft's answer to UNIX (Score:4, Funny)
What you call a bug, I call a feature. I like being able to build a box without having an unnecessary GUI adding overhead and unneeded complexity. If I'm building a box that is destined to sit under the hood of some machinery and has to be 100% reliable and as fast and stable as possible why would I want to add an unnecessary GUI? The inability of Windows to be customized and have parts removed is a huge weakness, not an advantage.
Having the same GUI API as other distributions and UNIX like systems is not a core feature, it is an interoperability feature. Solaris, RedHat Linux, OpenBSD, MacOS X, etc. all have had consistent GUI APIs for years. Sure some of them also support other GUI APIs and they don't have the same GUI API as one another, but then again, Windows doesn't have the same GUI API as any of these others either. Complaining that a given Linux distro and an SGI machine don't have same GUI API is like complaining a given version of Windows and Amigas don't have the same GUI APIs. If you want to argue about who has better support for cross-platform graphics, well I can run most X-11 based graphics on my Mac OS X machine out of the box, without resorting to an emulator. Can any version of Windows?