MySQL and SCO Join Forces 516
matchboy writes "CNET is reporting that MySQL and SCO have signed a partnership to work on "joint certification, marketing, sales, training and business development work for a version of the database for SCO's new OpenServer 6 version of Unix." Why would MySQL decide to work directly with a company that has deemed the GPL as unconstitutional?"
It's simple (Score:5, Funny)
MySQL Business Strategy (Score:4, Funny)
2 - Point gun at foot
3 - Pull trigger
Join? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Maybe... (Score:5, Funny)
yea, just think of all that potential revenue coming from those millions of SCO customers
Re:Maybe... (Score:5, Funny)
Asperger's syndrome (Score:3, Funny)
The people at MySQL-AB must all be suffering from a severe case of asperger's syndrome that is preventing them from understanding how everyone else will view this move.
I'm not sure what MySQL is going to get out of this deal, but whatever it is, it isn't worth the REALLY BAD pr and public ill will that is going to be created.
SCO is boil on the asshole of humanity. There is no excuse for doing business with them. You can't shake the devil's hand and say you're only kidding.
Lee
April 1st?! (Score:5, Funny)
they need to search through stolen linux code (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Just use PostgreSQL... (Score:4, Funny)
Judging by the number of people who use that argument against PostgreSQL, I wouldn't be surprised at all if he were behind MySQL.
Heck, if MySQL's PR dept. can't come up with other compelling arguments, they might as well try reverse psychology.
Re:Asperger's syndrome (Score:1, Funny)
That is an insult to all the assholes out there.
Followed By (Score:5, Funny)
Re:It's simple (Score:2, Funny)
Re:MySQL Business Strategy (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oh, bullshit. (Score:3, Funny)
Sad (Score:1, Funny)
Head out of arse please.
Re:New Playing Field (Score:1, Funny)
Yeah, because *that's* why people use MySQL - for the features.
MySQL is way behind Postgres with regards to both features and performance. People who stick with it do so becuase they know it, not because it's the best solution.
Re:doubtful (Score:3, Funny)
Re:One question? (Score:4, Funny)
>
> Not trying to be funny or lame here, I seriously want to know how to say the bloody thing.
Well it's *spelled* PostgreSQL, but it's pronounced "Throatwobbler Mangrove."
Re:Because... (Score:3, Funny)
Also... count(*) is bad form... count(1) is more efficient in most SQL databases... ohh and the missing "'".
Re:Because... (Score:4, Funny)
*ducks*
Re:Followed By (Score:2, Funny)