Google Hires Vint Cerf 307
hsuwh writes "Google has hired Internet pioneer Vint Cerf away from MCI as its "Chief Internet Evangelist".
"He is one of the most important people alive today," said [Google CEO Eric] Schmidt, who has been friends with Cerf for more than 20 years. "Vint has put his heart and soul into making the Internet happen. I know he is going to jump right in here and start shoveling out new ideas for Google.""
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:4, Insightful)
Cerf at NASA on Google-like project? (Score:4, Insightful)
How is this project Google-like, other than seeming to be pretty cool?
Cerf has been working on a network utility issue with NASA. I wasn't aware that Google is in the network utility game at all.
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:5, Insightful)
All you can do is try to assemable the greatest group(s) of already provably inventive poeple you can find, put them in a positive, stimulating environment, and incent them to come up with something great.
That is what Google is doing. That is exactly NOT what Microsoft, HP, et. al. are doing.
And no, they don't expect you to understand this.
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:5, Insightful)
Successful jocks collect supermodels, successful nerds collect supergeeks, I guess.
Something Big is Happening at Google (Score:5, Insightful)
Like the great stuff Alan Kay did for Apple? (Score:1, Insightful)
sure (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Something Big is Happening at Google (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:He did what? (Score:4, Insightful)
The fact that we can do so much with TCP/IP is evidence that the creator actually had more sense then most people in this industry, trivilizing his stuff because you can name stuff built off of that is a joke.
You make jokes about the size of ARPANET but what you don't realize is that those 9 computers were linked to each other, before that you'd have to have a direct line to each computer to call it a link, instead you could do one link to a central system to route the packages with out any major software really running. The idea of the ARPAnet is that it was a defensive infrastructure that could be attacked, and had nodes destroyed with out losing the entire network.
And as for size, yeah it's 9 computers, what ever you want to believe.
Just because you don't beliieve he's worth anything doesn't make him worth less. The fact is the guy actually invented something everyone uses now, that's incredible, a single standarized system of Control, that everyone can agree to, on all platforms, and hasn't been completely revolutionized for the most part for 30 years. Let's see your next development last more then 10 with out needing to be completely scrapped and reworked.
Re:Google TLD? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:4, Insightful)
I had the chance to listen in on a google interview last week for some kind of QA position. It was very strange. The questions that were asked had nothing really to do with trying to get to the heart of whether or not the guy was a good programmer, or that he understood the basic QA concepts and how to test properly, etc... Instead it was a kind of game where the candidate was supposed to recall as many esoteric bits of pseudo-knowledge as possible. Like, name all of the character encoding standards in the world that you know, or which RFCs describe HTTP, and explain how the protocol works...
Questions that are essentially meaningless as far as QA is concerned... in fact, meaningless as far as any position they could offer is concerned, unless they are planning to hire an Internet Historian. I think in that entire conversation, which went on for about an hour, only a single question that cold be considered something pertaining to "QA" or testing was asked, and that was oddly half-hearted (I believe it was something like, "In one minute, please name all the test cases you can think of for a web form that takes credit card info").
I got the impression from the questions posed in that call that Google really don't have a clue how to hire. They seem to hire based on same technique as Japanese entrance exams.. i.e. pure knowledge bits are more important than conceptual understanding or problem solving...
Now I am beginning to think that Google isn't actually as smart as people think... They are just remendously lucky...
Re:Wikipedia link (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:5, Insightful)
no (Score:3, Insightful)
Shortage of ideas? Not so sure. I don't see why Cerf , being the father of the medium in which google is based, wouldn't be a uself hire.
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Vint (Score:2, Insightful)
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=161582&thresho ld=1&commentsort=0&tid=95&mode=thread&pid=13510971 #13512140 [slashdot.org]
Which support the development of international standards for protocols that don't break over long distances with lossy data link layers. The point being that with a proper delay-tolerant protocol, reliability goes up and long-distance links become more efficient. No one intends to surf the internet from Mars, but it would be nice to reliably send commands to and receive data from a rover via a secure link on a computer with just a standard internet connection. On top of this, a good deep-space protocol would get the information from source to destination whether or not the rover has a line-of-sight link or must go through an orbiting probe, and it would not require the scientist to worry about the messy details of setting up the link.
All of this is missing from current space protocols. Interestingly enough, if you read through the delay-tolerant-networking research group's website ( http://www.dtnrg.org/ [dtnrg.org] ), you'll see that these protocol standards have terrestrial applications with civilian, miltary and scientific projects.
Re:You have to wonder what they are up to... (Score:1, Insightful)
My guess is that in eight or so years Grandma will be comfortably using something like the rumored GoogleOS that she carries around on a small PDA with a flexible roll-out screen. Think "the network is the computer" and stretch yourself to think "the user is the operating system." Think voice recognition and complete wireless context awareness. Adsense will be so refined that it will actually be considered helpful because the ads will be so relevant. Anyone who uses Amazon a lot can imagine just how far that personalization of information can go. You don't type the search keywords, you ARE the keywords.
One of their bigger challenges will be security. The better the security, the better the system, but this will take away much of the Wild West element that we so enjoy. But it will be required to ensure integrity of transactions and information relevance (bye-bye spammers and trolls). Big Brother concerns will loom but the system is so fun and useful that people will accept the risks.
Don't think they're out to trample Microsoft Windows. Windows will suffer in the home market especially, but this is not just another operating system; you have to think in terms of when the automobile first arrived. Back then few people imagined how it would transform the world.
To me the exciting part is watching this digital evolution happen before our eyes. It has such a sense of inevitability almost as if some otherworldly intelligence guides it. Illuminati anyone?
Re:Do they have a strategy behind this? (Score:5, Insightful)
Isaac Newton
Francis Bacon
Claude Shannon. Father of modern information theory. Published (Not Patented) "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" in 1948. Died a Professor Emeritus.
Nicola Tesla -- Modern multi-phase power systems. Edison was a puny shadow ofthe same era. Slaved for 10 years as a New York street cleaner to bring his 3-phase power system to reality, and then "gave away" the patents, worth Billions (perhaps even Trillions) in todays dollars, to Westinghouse.
Evariste Galois -- Galois fields (eg. Reed-Solomon encoding). Died in a duel protecting the honour of a woman.
Need I go on?