Mozilla Firefox 1.5 Beta 1 Released 626
elfguygmail.com writes "Firefox 1.5 beta1 is out! It includes many new features including a new automatic update system, reworked options dialogs, faster browsing, new error pages, memory and stability updates. Get your beta at Mozilla.org."
Woohoo! (Score:5, Interesting)
I'll update if... (Score:3, Interesting)
I hope it will turn out more stable... (Score:5, Interesting)
If it were my choice at work, I'd use Opera.
Now with native SVG support! (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Deer Park !!!!!!!!!! (Score:3, Interesting)
I agree completely--slow back/forward has made me stick with Opera. Firefox 1.0.6 takes a while to render the page, which is annoying especially when going back to anchors. Opera is nearly instanteous; hopefully Deer Park can compete (trying it now).
Re:Fp (Score:3, Interesting)
Based on 30 seconds of usage (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Fp (Score:2, Interesting)
svg release schedule? (Score:5, Interesting)
But I'm a little dissapointed it looks like the built-in SVG support isn't in there. Guess it's still alpha? (Haven't been following the Deer Park releases)
I'm really looking forward to the day where I can actually do a site in SVG and be able to expect more than 2 or 3 people to be able to see it...
And wow am I ever tired of struggling with the Flash IDE.
Re:Yeah! (Score:2, Interesting)
Screw that. I'll take the very annoying dialogue popup instead.
How hard is it to make the error just pop up on a page in place of the page that didn't load in the first place?!
Re:Extensions (Score:3, Interesting)
I haven't made any extensions before, but from what little I know, doesn't that mean I can unzip the installed extension, find the file, add 1.5 to the list, rezip and go?
Re:Woohoo! (Score:5, Interesting)
Regards,
Steve
Re:Copy and Paste Fixed? (Score:3, Interesting)
Now we're talkin' (Score:2, Interesting)
Now here's something other [microsoft.com] web browsers should also include in themselves. Let's hope that M$ also "copies" this feature into de "new" IE 7.
Re:Woohoo! (Score:2, Interesting)
GCC 4.01 (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Fp (Score:5, Interesting)
So what, if the vast majority of websites don't bother styling them? Form controls can default to Aqua without compromising the spec. In other words, there's no need for controls to be ugly if ugliness isn't specified in the HTML, and even then, you can handle it the elegant and tasteful way:
Naturally, that's how WebKit behaves [opendarwin.org]. Ugliness has no place on the Mac desktop, even on the web.
Re:Now we're talkin' (Score:3, Interesting)
Go there [webstandards.org] and let them know you want web standards compliance.
inline-block? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Deer Park Alpha 2 is great (Score:3, Interesting)
the guys behind the tabbrowser extention will make
it so the tabs can be on the left side of the browser
window AND have tab name run vertically. This is the
one thing I still wish for in terms of UI that is
not available from any browser I know of.
Re:Auto update! (Score:4, Interesting)
Well, as one who manages the family computer, which runs WinXP, AutoUpdate is actually pretty useful. I haven't had to install an update manually for quite some time.
Seriously though, I can't wait until we get an OSX port that doesn't suck (Camino is okay, but what good is it if you can't use all the cool firefox extensions?).
Well, as a Mac OS X user, I feel your pain. But, I'm wondering which parts suck for you? I have issues with page rendering. Look at these rendering jobs from the LiveJournal [livejournal.com] home page (be kind! this is hosted on my personal server box):
Any one else have this problem? I know it's not too isolated since I've had this happen on both installations of OS X 10.4 and even 10.3. Or are there other problems that I don't know about?
Mozilla? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Firefox 1.5 installation directions (Score:4, Interesting)
FireFox web page in IE (Score:5, Interesting)
Blame Microsoft all you want, but this is inexcusable. If you want people to switch to FireFox, they need to believe FireFox is better. Seeing as most web sites are built for IE, users coming to FireFox's web site see a page that doesn't render correctly and they assume the makers of the page are to blame. Why would they blame IE? Every other page they go to renders just fine in IE.
Since the same organization that made the page makes the software, it is conceivable that people would be turned away from FireFox on the assumption that people who produce broken web pages also produce broken programs.
Whether the FireFox web site doesn't properly support IE out of laziness, or out of malice. It should be fixed.
Re:svg release schedule? (Score:2, Interesting)
Overall Firefox 1.5's SVG support seems disappointing to me: major features are still being added late in the alpha/beta cycle, huge swaths of the SVG standard are still not implemented, UI features like zooming and scrolling are MIA, and compatibility seems to have been ignored thus far. IMHO Firefox 1.5's SVG is likely to be buggy, incomplete, and quirky. Perhaps the only way for it to progress is to shove it into a release and get people using it, but I hope that doesn't mean we'll be stuck supporting Firefox 1.5's SVG quirks forever. I suppose the improved updater should help eliminate that problem.
Re:Back (Score:4, Interesting)
I think Firefox 1.5 is basically as fast as Opera on this now, so it's nice to see one of Opera's killer features in Firefox.
Re:Deer Park !!!!!!!!!! (Score:4, Interesting)
Now that Firefox have finally caught up I might just switch back, though. It was the feature that converted me to Opera in the first place.
Re:Deer Park !!!!!!!!!! (Score:1, Interesting)
Now at last it works, it will remember my text, without reloading the whole page!!!
And for one!!! It's free!!!
UNTITLED tabs on timeout (Score:2, Interesting)
Also there's that thing where the browser will not display the page due to some timeout again I guess, but the ticker thing still rotates as if it's trying to fetch the page (a look at netstat or LievHTTPHeaders tells you it's not).
Mind you I think the rotating ticker thing is broken in Thunderbird too, as it keeps on going after 'no new messages on server'.
Or is it meant to constantly rotate in the top right of the window just to distract you?!
Don't get me wrong, I love Mozilla stuff, but there's still basic bugs in it that need fixing before adding more crap.
Re:I hope it will turn out more stable... (Score:3, Interesting)
- Sometimes Flash wont process mouse clicks.
- Sometimes Firefox would start to work slow when
looking at a Flash movie/application. [ not happening in opera]
- When into a Flash page, if you leave Firefox open for a lot of time then memory will go up a lot (once it ended being like 250MB with only 1 window (no tabs) open in a flash page).
Oh and one thing I LOVE about opera Flash support is that when you resize the window Opera resizes the Flash content. It is REALLY good as in firefox resizing just affect the fonts (I would also want it to resize images but... i think it is a lot to ask for).
Re:FireFox web page in IE (Score:2, Interesting)
But users don't care for that, I know, and what counts isn't the technical proof but the impression the site leaves on Joe Sixpack.
Any professional typographer will tell you the way Firefox interprets the site is much user-friendlier. Text lines should not be too wide or it will make reading more difficult. This is a common problem with most liquid layouts and max-width would be the perfect solution to the problem if IE supported it. While I agree that Mozilla should have used a work-around to make it display the same everywhere, I can understand the idea behind using standards-compliant CSS and like this demonstrating Firefox's superiority. Your comment, however, shows that this probably isn't working for a lot of people.
Re:Auto update! (Score:3, Interesting)
Exactly (Score:2, Interesting)
Thank you for posting that. I wish more people would understand that GC is not some sort of resource management panacea, and stop relying on it as a crutch to support bad designs.
Typically, GC prevents exactly one category of programmer error for exactly one type of resource: forgetting to release memory before your program ends. That category of error is one of the least dangerous anyway, since pretty much any modern OS will do it for you as a last resort.
GC provides no guarantees against a poor design hogging memory while the program is still running, and often doesn't work well with resources other than memory. What really matters in a typical application is the timely release of all resources, and usually GC won't help with that.
Remember, boys and girls, the first rule of resource management is that every resource must have an owner responsible for releasing it when it's no longer needed. If your ownership strategy isn't clear or the owner doesn't have the knowledge/ability to release its resource(s) promptly, then your design is beyond hope and no GC in the world will save you.
Re:Doesn't Fix Splitting Absolutely Positioned Fra (Score:3, Interesting)
this bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9458 [mozilla.org]
has been open since 1999 and has over 150 votes. and quite frankly, i don't think the votes mean much. i remember reading a quote from a major maintainer saying that he might consider how many votes a bug had if it was something in the tens of thousands. (this was about two years ago, regarding the most voted on bug in bugzilla, with a little over 500 votes. and still open, by the way...)
and as much as i like mozilla/firefox and appreciate the work that the developers are putting into it, i still find it ridiculous how they will frequently mass move bugs that they don't feel like fixing (even ones marked as release blockers) from one release to the next. the bug above was originally targetted for mozilla milestone M9...