Google & Sun Planning Web Office 751
astrab writes "According to this post at Dirson's blog, Google and Sun Microsystems are to announce a new and kick-ass webtool: an Office Suite based on Sun's OpenOffice and accesible with your browser. Today at 10:30h (Pacific Time) two companies are holding a conference with more details, but Jonathan Schwartz (President of Sun Microsystems) claimed on Saturday on this post of his blog that "the world is about to change this week", predicting new ways to access software."
Re:Google Conquers all (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Microsoft's Worst Fear (Score:2, Informative)
According to others, SUN doesn't take the extra effort to make there x64 hardware Windows imcompatible and MS won't do the extra effort to brake their OS more on SUN h/w then on the others.
That said, of course they would do anything in there power to at least equalize the software market a bit. It's easier to be competitive if the market is open.
Re:Wow (Score:5, Informative)
They may be developing an ulcer, but as we established in the previous front page article [slashdot.org], it would be due to H. Pylori, not stress...
Nevertheless, I agree. OpenOffice for the Web? Brilliant!
How is this new? (Score:3, Informative)
StarPortal (Score:4, Informative)
It is essentially a Java encapsulation of Star/Open Office accessible through a browser. Pretty cool stuff, but involved some hefty Java downloads (~100MB?) to get it started up. Once started up though, it was almost identical to using a native version of Star/Open Office.
Marty
Re:Google is officially evil (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Google is officially evil (Score:2, Informative)
If you look at that story, you find it's a complaint from the "Taiwan Solidarity Union", a nationalist group that proposes independence for Taiwan. Though Taiwan is in effect an independent country, it has always been officially, according to both its own and the Beijing government, a province of China. They differ though on what "China" is. Taiwan sees it as the "Republic of China", whose government in exile is "temporarily" in Taipei; Beijing as the "People's Republic of China", ruled by the communists. Only in the last few years have any Taiwanese politicians dared to advocate legal independence, and Beijing is very quick to rattle the sabres about this.
Traffic alert! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Google is officially evil (Score:2, Informative)
Taiwan is NOT a province of China.
All the latest Chinese government did was "free" them from the Japanese rule (which wasnt a pleasant time either), but instead of actually liberating the Taiwanese, the Chinese did the exact same as what the Japanese were doing! They kept marital law in place, killed many familes, and basically treated Taiwan like shit.
Who are you to make such a bold and infuriating statement to any Taiwanese? Have you even visited the island? Have you spoke with anyone who was alive during this oppression?
Auto-save (Score:2, Informative)
Re:How it should work (Score:1, Informative)
Re:Microsoft's Worst Fear (Score:3, Informative)
Google makes products that work the best on MS platforms.
Google Earth - MS only,
Google Talk - MS only, but thanks to Jabber other OSs can piggyback.
Google Desktop Search - MS only (IE 5.5 +)
All this talk about the mighty Goog toppling "Micro$haft" is pretty pointless, as it seems that google's code is not all that portable over different OSs and browsers.
It's like a parasite, you want to exploit the advantages of your host (being installed on 90 % of world's computers), but you don't want to kill it.
Re:Google is officially evil (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Two Years Later (Score:1, Informative)
For fuck's sake, why do so many people have trouble spelling "losing" correctly.
Look, here's a simple technique. There are two words with different spellings: "lose" and "loose". Look at the two spellings. Which one sounds like "goose". Is it the four-letter version? That doesn't seem likely. So now we know that "loose" sounds like "goose".
Say it after me. "Loose as in goose". Is that clear?
Sun is doing it... (Score:4, Informative)
Sun is working on project looking glass Which is linux based, and the UI is similar (and maybe even a bit cooler) than osx. Check out the screenshots [sun.com]
Re:What if? (Score:3, Informative)
Why would you want to abandon one of the best features the unix desktop has?
WOW..Tremendous Letdown! (Score:5, Informative)
Well, that was a HUGE letdown (Score:5, Informative)
In the Q&A session, Eric Schmidt says that they will *assist* in the distribution of OpenOffice (whatever that menas), but that they are *not* announcing a new product (i.e., Google Office).
I think that the blog community got way, way ahead of this story.
Re:What if? (Score:3, Informative)
Pie, meet sky. Microsoft can barely come up with something that runs Windows software! What makes you think that Google, with a bare fraction of the resources of Microsoft could do it?
Having a Java/OSS "OpenOffice" would be fun. Click a link. Wait 40 minutes for Swrite.jar to download. Open file. Click save. Wait 2 minutes while the file gets uploaded over your 128k upstream DSL. Yuck.
"The network IS the computer" still has a long way to go, a few examples:
1) Kerberos uses symetric encryption. Why? Nothing like having all the credentials for all your users in PLAINTEXT on a server - if it gets hacked, all your security is HOSED and you get to re-issue passwords to anybody who MIGHT have been logged in... this is just lame.
2) X works great - on a LAN with near unlimited bandwidth. Introduce true Internet speeds, and it sucks balls pretty fast. Also, you have to tunnel it over ssh or something, otherwise your security sucks. And, everybody "knows" that you don't leave ports 6000+ open, otherwise you're open to all kinds of attacks. (Oops! Your network transparency just became network opaque!)
3) Ever try to run NFS over the Internet... SECURELY?!?! Its host-based security model is piss-poor, and performance is second to just about anything else.
4) OpenLDAP is a true, pain in the ass to use. Ever try modifying a schema for an OpenLDAP server? Having to dump/reload the entire LDAP DB be cause you change a single field is truely CRAPTACULAR.
5) Java is awesome for hardware abstraction - but where's the OSS version? What is there out there that's OSS and provides equivalent functionality? When do I get to get a java release via yum, as part of my OS install CD?
6) When do I get to mix objects in PHP, Perl, C, and Java into a single codebase? PHP is my language of choice for most of my work, but sometimes I'd just LOVE to something in C to get some improved performance, or maybe take a perl class and access it directly from PHP... Since there's not a standards organization everybody pays any attention to, this kind of functionality just won't happen anytime soon...
7) When will I be able to mix/match objects? Why can't I instantiate a software object in C or PHP on a remote system, such that the object occupies memory on THAT system instead of THIS one, and have it all work? Why can't we have a "network aware" process model?
Don't get me wrong - OSS is awesome, I type this on my Dell Inspiron laptop running Fedora Core Linux, (and I'm happy to use it!) - but acknowledging your weaknesses is the first step to fixing them.
Nothing To See Here (Score:4, Informative)