A Comparison of Solaris, Linux, and FreeBSD Kernel 318
v1x writes "An article at OpenSolaris examines three of the basic subsystems of the kernel and compares implementation between Solaris 10, Linux 2.6, and FreeBSD 5.3.
From the article: 'Solaris, FreeBSD, and Linux are obviously benefiting from each other. With Solaris going open source, I expect this to continue at a faster rate. My impression is that change is most rapid in Linux. The benefits of this are that new technology has a quick incorporation into the system.'"
Flavourful. (Score:5, Funny)
One is crunchy, the other's chewy, and the last is malt flavoured.
I was expecting a beefier article... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:I was expecting a beefier article... (Score:1, Funny)
Re:I was expecting a beefier article... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:wishfull thinking (Score:2, Funny)
***Microsoft Trade Secrets Protection Act***
The person that wrote the above post has been dealt with for sharing Microsoft (R) Windows (R) proprietary source code and is violation of the End-User License Agreement as well as Microsoft Revised Penal Code section 192.168.0.1. The person has been terminated and please disregard the above message.
Thank you,
Microsoft Support Team
SCO Engineers Do It Best (Score:3, Funny)
Don't say it isn't true - or our lawyers will be calling.
WARNING! A hole in one. (Score:1, Funny)
GoatseFS is sort of the Roach Motel(TM) of filesystems. Your data checks in, and no one wants it back.
Suck my cock you goatfucking assflute of a whore (Score:-1, Funny)
Re:When will OSI licenses really start working? (Score:1, Funny)
"very well".
excellent, glad you agree
Re:STFU CYRIC! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:How much of Solaris has gone open source? (Score:3, Funny)