What's New With IE, Firefox, Opera 542
prostoalex writes "The Web browser market hasn't seen the competition heat up for a while, but things are getting quite exciting, PC World reports. The magazine looks into the latest features that are incorporated into Microsoft's Internet Explorer, Mozilla Foundation's Firefox and Opera Software's Opera. From the article: "We took Internet Explorer 7 Beta 1, Firefox 1.5 Release Candidate 1, and Opera 9 Preview 1 out for a spin. Both the Firefox beta and the Opera beta are available for download, although Opera isn't publicizing this early testing version; the browsers' final editions should be out around the time you read this. On the other hand, the IE 7 beta will not be available for downloading until early next year.""
Both Opera And Firefox Support SVG (Score:5, Informative)
http://svg.codebot.org/ [codebot.org]
Completely non-informative article (Score:4, Informative)
what about galeon? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Opera? (Score:5, Informative)
It sends a user-agent string that is enough to persuade most browser detection that it's IE, but it includes the word Opera -- and web log analysis tools are designed to recognize that.
This is Opera's default user-agent (from the page you linked):
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; OS) Opera X.Y
People do, in fact, understand that this user-agent refers to Opera, and they develop their log analysis tools to report that fact. I have never seen a web log analysis tool that didn't understand Opera's user-agent.
The traffic on the webservers I maintain shows Opera at around 0.09% of total hits, just behind Lynx.
Re:Regardless of which..... (Score:5, Informative)
Heh. Hah. HA HAHA HAHAHA!
*ahem*
Sorry about that.
"W3C Compliant" is much easier to define for a website than for a web browser. Why? A compliant website uses only features defined in the W3C specs, or only uses other features in ways that will gracefully degrade in compliant browsers (though some purists will object to the latter definition).
For a browser, does it mean something that implements every part of a W3C standard? Or one that implements part of a standard but makes sure not to contradict it anywhere? Is it OK if it implements nonstandard features like those used in AJAX? And which standards? HTML, CSS and JavaScript/ECMAScript are a good start, but what about SVG? XHTML? XForms?
The specs are complex enough that there still is no web browser that implements all of even the current versions of HTML/CSS/JavaScript. At best, you can measure relative compliance, in which case Firefox and company, Opera, and Safari are all well ahead of even IE7. But waiting for a "W3C Compliant" browser is going to take a while.
Re:Opera UI (Score:3, Informative)
Actually, you can. Look under Tools / Preferences / Advanced.
can't change the layout to be what I like.
Ah, this is interesting. You see, I can't get FF to make it the layout I like (one of my main reasons for using Opera.) I have the address bar and the tab bar at the bottom of the screen, and no File Edit etc menus at the top. Last time I checked, it was either impossible or nearly so to get FF to do this. So, I understand what you mean about interface being a big deal, but it's not Opera's fault that it doesn't work just the way you specifically want it to. I'm not blaming FF for it's configuration problems, even though I believe it has some.
Re:I wonder... (Score:3, Informative)
Firefox doesn't support text-shadow (or, totally apropos nothing, display: inline-block for that matter), but Safari does, and tastefully applied, it's great to have around. Why IE doesn't pair its proprietary filters to standard CSS properties like these is beyond me.
Re:Avant Browser (Score:2, Informative)
If you are however content to use a IE based browser that fails in all the same ways that IE fails (security and standards compliant rendering being my main to beefs) then by all means go right ahead. But be forewarned your avant browser, is nothing but an IE skin, and in my opinion it's not even a very good one.
~Anders
Re:Opera UI (Score:3, Informative)
You mean like the option, "minimum font size (in pixels)"? Or the options that allow you (in the same part of preferences, "fonts") to define the default fonts and sizes for websites? Or perhaps do you mean the option to zoom in on any webpage (although that increases the size of images too...)
Re:what about galeon? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Avant Browser (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Both Opera And Firefox Support SVG (Score:3, Informative)
So some features work in both browsers, some only work in Opera, and some only work in Firefox.
Re:I'm getting tired of this (Score:3, Informative)
What percentage of your time using a computer is spent using a browser? For most of us, it's a pretty significant percentage. That's what makes it important.
Opera beats out Gecko (Score:5, Informative)
A few months ago I started using Opera again (I've used it since Windows 3.1 days, but not seriously since then) full time, it took some configuring, I changed some keyboard shortcuts (CTRL-T to open a new tab for a start), added a web developer type toolbar, rearranged some stuff, and got a nice skin for it. But man, it's just so much faster and more responsive than Firefox.
There are only three things I miss.. the abundance of plugins (some I miss particularly - live headers , url navigator and the flash click to play thingee), Venkman, and a designMode/contentEditable API (rich text (html) editing in the browser). Opera 9 implements designMode now, so that just leaves 2 before Gecko browsers earn the "browser of 2nd to last resort" badge from me.
People really should give Opera a fair try, it really is better than Gecko IMHO. And now it's free (beer), there's not much of a reason not to give it a shot.
Re:Regardless of which..... (Score:5, Informative)
ECMAScript is an ECMA standard, not a W3C standard.
DOM and Javascript DOM bindings, on the other hand, are W3C standards.
Re:Regardless of which..... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Opera beats out Gecko (Score:3, Informative)
Try this [userjs.org].
Re:Whatever (Score:1, Informative)
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
8916 sc 16 0 316m 141m 17m S 0.0 37.6 205:53.37 firefox-bin
8996 sc 16 0 122m 39m 16m S 0.0 10.6 7:48.32 mozilla-thunder
With all that memory it is gobbling up, Firefox could pass for a Java app! Thunderbird looks as though it could stand to trim some fat as well. Memory consumption like this seems ridiculous to me especially when other browsers out there (e.g. Epiphany, Opera, etc.) do not consume nearly as many resources to get the same job done. Hell, Opera even packs its punch in a smaller binary.
For those of you who can't understand why this is an issue because you have 1 GB of RAM, keep in mind that there are still an abundance of Win98-era machines in use and bloated software is especially painful on them.
Re:Opera (Score:4, Informative)
That's like saying "I don't like Firefox because I don't like it".
Re:safari!!! (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Whatever (Score:5, Informative)
user_pref("browser.cache.memory.capacity", 10240);
Re:Opera beats out Gecko (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Firefox unfriendly to European languages (Score:3, Informative)
Firefox and Opera. (Score:1, Informative)
I have been using Opera from 6.5 and Firefox from 0.6 / 0.7 (not sure), but at that time I was the only one in my neighbourhood.
Well Opera for once had faster loading times for pages initially, but rendering and compliance of
Thing I love about Opera is Last Session.
Also it loaded pages a little faster. But even now javascript is a little itchy in Opera.
I have also been using Firefox - no rules says you can't use two browsers - was pretty neet, it was good at one thing - browsing. The memory was not a issue - compared to that time Opera
Now it has grown - extensions and all... and is certainly great in browsing, better compliance and stable.
[Yeah the ACROBAT extension - sink it in the sea, and sometimes the Flash extension, they are the things that crash it. Acrobat is a must crash extension ! Firefox eats memory and sometimes processor. (Not that it is firefox's fault - I remeber in 0.6 you had had to look for the flash extension, google for it)]
I haven't used IE over 1 year.
But people around me started swithing near FF 0.8-0.9
And by the way Opera has plug-ins, obviously, you do know that??!
I'll stick with the two for now.
Re:When do we get REAL RESIZING like acrobat (Score:3, Informative)
Re:When do we get REAL RESIZING like acrobat (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Regardless of which..... (Score:5, Informative)
In both cases you did something wrong, and the browsers either did something to try and salvage things, or followed the spec and gave you garbage. If anything, I'd expect non-ASCII text in headers to be encoded as per RFC-2047, but I doubt any browsers implement that.
What's not explicitly forbidden is allowed, right?
Non-ASCII text in headers is explicitly forbidden.
Re:Has firefox fixed updates? (Score:4, Informative)
Re:what we need for compliant browsers (Score:1, Informative)
Re:what we need for compliant browsers (Score:1, Informative)
Did what? Sure Firefox had an amazing rise in just a few months, but it took 100% share out of Netscape 6.2, and about 50% out of mozilla.
IE share was solid in the long run. The rise of firefox stopped as soon as every
So, firefox buble is like talking about IE users turning to Avant browser! Pretty lame.
Re:what we need for compliant browsers (Score:2, Informative)
Microsoft proposed their own graphical markup language (VML) that they also use in Office - but it was rejected. I guess they feel spurned.
But Mozilla has ignored SVG?!? Firefox supports SVG natively since Firefox 1.5 Alpha - it is NOT supported as an add-on. Furthermore, the SVG spec is a very complex one - it's not something that can be trivially implemented.
FYI, Safari is currently working on updating WebKit to support SVG based on Konqueror's KSVG plugin.
Re:When do we get REAL RESIZING like acrobat (Score:1, Informative)
https://addons.mozilla.org/extensions/moreinfo.ph
I agree this should be built in to the browser, though.
Re:what we need for compliant browsers (Score:2, Informative)