Traditional Radio Endangered By New Tech 287
Rob wrote to mention a Reuters article discussing the danger to traditional radio posed by new new technologies. From the article: "The radio industry could find itself at the kids' table in the media banquet hall, as new technology threatens the business, advertising executives said this week at the Reuters Media and Advertising Summit. Satellite radio, digital music players and the Internet are slowly encroaching on traditional radio's stronghold on local entertainment and advertising. Plus, radio ads themselves are less memorable and creative, these executives said."
Satellite Radio Sucks (Score:4, Interesting)
The Howard Stern Effect (Score:4, Interesting)
Let us all come together and hope that the FCC doesn't try to regulate that which we pay for.
NPR (Score:2, Interesting)
And...? (Score:3, Interesting)
Ah, the old blame game (Score:5, Interesting)
Odd (Score:2, Interesting)
XM/Sirius question (Score:3, Interesting)
Can I be in the basement of a building and still get a signal ?
Traditional radio killing itself (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Stay tuned for another bandwidth auction... (Score:4, Interesting)
Podcasting Satellite Radio (Score:1, Interesting)
Podcasting is the solution: Get the data when you're connected to a nice, high speed land line, store it on the digital media player of your choice in nice high quality formats where you don't have to make compromises due to transmission speed limits, and then listen to your heart's content. Don't like a particular show? Skip it, no waiting for the show you want to come on. It's all the content [i]you[/i] want constantly at your fingertips.
And best of all it doesn't gib when you go into a tunnel...
Podcasting is getting big with sites like ClickCaster [clickcaster.com], Podnova [podnova.com], and Odeo [odeo.com]. I really do think that Podcasting will bring about the death of traditional radio, and hopefully we'll see Vidcasting as a replacement for TV.
Radio is free, but not all radio is the same (Score:5, Interesting)
Sample choices on FM: Alternative, rock, country, or Top 40. Commercials for five minutes every half hour.
Sample choices on XM: All traffic, 80's hits, bluegrass, comedy, each baseball game being played, hard rock, progressive rock, folk rock, classic rock. Twelve different talk stations, from far-right to far-left, sports and news. Commercials on the comedy and talk stations, but that's it.
When you have 200 stations, you have to keep them different, which means... and this is the kicker... you have to DIG DEEPER INTO THE FEATURED GENRE. Example: I like Rush. (I'm a nerd, I'm on Slashdot, whatever. My taste in music is an example, not the argument.) On FM, I hear three or four different songs by Rush, maybe one a day. I'm done with Spirit of Radio for a while, thanks. On XM, on their ProgRock station, I hear obscure stuff from unpopular albums that I like. You won't hear Analog Kid on ClearChannel stations. I also hear other groups who don't get the press who play a similar style of music. This depth of genre (obscure songs from well-known bands and obscure bands) simply isn't available on FM. Hell, I heard Side One of Thick as a Brick by Jethro Tull on XM the other day. The whole thing. It's on the order of 30 minutes long. Nobody on FM will play that - it's not "radio friendly". So I don't get to hear it if I only listen to FM.
That's why I shell out $13/mo for XM. IT'S NOT THE SAME AS FM, and it's a service I'm willing to pay for. When I have the choice and depth that I get from this service available to me for free, that's when Hogan's argument becomes relevant.
"iPod killed the radio star..." (Score:5, Interesting)
Could? Try "already have". Every time I get in the car, I listen to the radio for exactly as long as it takes for the radio to load the cassette adapter for the iPod. Funny that usually the 2-3 seconds of radio I hear each time are...either a DJ, or a commercial. I got an mp3 player for christmas back in '99 primarily because I was tired of spending most of my commute listening to commercials, if I wasn't listening to NPR news.; the iPod finally made it practical. So cry me a river for the radio industry which is NOW realizing a market correction that started at least 2-3 years ago.
XM/Sirius is complete garbage; a relative has Sirius in his car, and it drops out all the time; tree cover, bridges, tall buildings. The audio quality is atrocious; the casette adapter for my iPod may eat low and high frequencies...but even a 128kbit mp3 through the casette adapter sounds better than Sirius. Plus it doesn't address any issues except the commercials- it's still crap other people want you to listen to, and not crap you want to listen to :-)
About the only thing worthwhile on radio right now is NPR; the news is superb, and the stuff during the weekends is usually pretty good too (I'm a fan of the old-school radio quiz shows.)
Re:Public Radio (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Satellite Radio Sucks (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:"iPod killed the radio star..." (Score:3, Interesting)
Wow,
that hasn't been my experience at all. I have a Sirius Sportster and it's been great. Granted the quality of the sound for the music channels is "ok", but I'd hardly call it "Atrocious." I'm listening to it in my *car*, not on a $10,000 home audio system where even CD's can sound like crap. I have a plain old VW golf, with a very average sound system and the satellite radio sounds perfectly fine. I will admit that most of the talk stations sound pretty bad, but I only listen to Bears games when i'm on the road, so bad sound is better than no sound and not hearing the game at all.
As far as dropping signals go, I almost never have that problem as well. There are a few underpasses I go through that drop the signal, but an equal number of parking garages where the signal is just fine. Even for a large part of lower Wacker Drive in Chicago, it holds the signal. I drove from Chicago to the north woods of Wisconsin this summer and never once did the signal drop, regardless of the tree cover. I have my antenna mounted to the roof of my car, just behind the factory antenna mast so nothing special there.
About the only real problem I've noticed is that if you try to use the FM Transceiver(?) feature to "broadcast" to the in-car stereo, there is too much intereference from competing stations. There are only a limited number of frequencies available with the Sirius radio itself, and just too many FM stations in the Chicagoland area to get a clean signal. So I went with a cassette adapter and all is well.
just my
jeff