Google to Buy Opera? 648
patro writes "Opera Watch writes Google is planning to buy the Opera browser. The source of the claim is Pierre Chappaz, the former president of Yahoo Europe. Google obviously can't buy Firefox, so Opera might be the next possible candidate." I can't begin to imagine why.
This is stupid. (Score:5, Interesting)
Data Mining (Score:3, Interesting)
Could be interesting.
A premonition? (Score:5, Interesting)
Reasons to buy Opera? (Score:3, Interesting)
Good because... (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm scared that Firefox 2.0 will have twice the system requirments than the operating systems on which it runs which, imho, it shouldn't.
Makes sense to me. (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm surprised they haven't done this already.
You're kidding, right? (Score:5, Interesting)
You can't? I can...
Microsoft has announced an intention to kill Google. (All right, Ballmer said so to a guy who was leaving to go to Google. Same difference.) Microsoft has made some announcements of stuff to compete with Google. Microsoft also controls the most-used browser.
Add it all up, and I can sure see why Google might want to have a (better, but less popular) browser under their control...
I can think of several reasons (Score:5, Interesting)
1. Opera is a fast browser with clean code. Fits with google quality requirements/desires.
2. Opera is closed source. Google can add secret sauce for tracking or search or ad related reasons.
3. Opera can be made into a product to compete with MS without giving away the source to competitors.
Re:This is stupid. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:This is slightly confusing. (Score:3, Interesting)
Mobile business? (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't think Google will buy Opera just yet at least, especially considering Opera's denial in connection to this, but Opera has a much greater foothold than any Mozilla product in the mobile market, and it has earlier been rumored that Google is considering moving into the mobile business more. (actually, they already have with their free WiFi service, their online mobile-targeting services, etc)
No Thanks (Score:3, Interesting)
No way am I using a browser and letting Google know THAT much about me, especially if they require you to have a Google account to use.
Re:Is Opera Google's doorway to beating Microsoft? (Score:5, Interesting)
First, if they can incorporate Open Office or even their own Office-style applet and combine it with the ability to search the web for information in real time, they could offer researchers, writers, students and even businesses the ability to grab information about the topic they're writing on instantly. Start writing a paper on cattle mutilations and GoogleWriter could offer you instant access to facts, opinions, Wikis, blogs and more on the topic.
GoogleNumbers could offer insight into the spreadsheet you're forming, offering equations and possibly enhancements.
GooglePresentations could incorporate Google Images or some search routines to bring in key phrases, pictures, graphs, who knows what information.
I'm not saying Opera is the end-game for Google, but it opens the door to incorporating more desktop oriented software the user is familiar with while attaching Google's top-notch aggregated data feeds for the user to tap.
This is strange -- they already give $ to Mozilla (Score:1, Interesting)
And is supporting them in other ways: http://news.zdnet.co.uk/0,39020330,39189475,00.ht
Perhaps they wish to buy (and then bury) the Opera browser?
Re:This is stupid. Maybe not (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Is Opera Google's doorway to beating Microsoft? (Score:5, Interesting)
According to your theory Google wants a standard platform with which to build up their apps. Firefox, being controlled by other people will be a moving target to a certain exent, which would slow them down.
If they buy Opera and beef up their web apps to Opera as a platform Opera is standards compliant so Firefox can easily adjust. The Firefox crew does the work of adjusting to Google instead of Google adjusting to Firefox.
Possible Reasons for buying Opera (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:2, Interesting)
Anyway - what's cheaper? Modifying Mozilla to whatever end pleases them? Or spending tens or hundreds of millions to buy out a company that has a browser and doing whatever to that?
The only difference I see is that I guess they can be more "closed" with their Opera modifications.
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:This is stupid. Maybe not (Score:1, Interesting)
A bloody nose for Google? (Score:3, Interesting)
Microsoft crushed them.
Google with a fraction of a percent of Microsoft's money has survived because they have solved new problems instead of competing with Microsoft on their own turf.
I.E.( "dominant browser" ) is a central part of MS's turf and they will not tolerate Google trying to snag it away from.
I see a fist fight coming.
who innovates? (Score:5, Interesting)
So who exactly is innovating in the marketplace and who is just protecting existing investment just like an old fossilised company?
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:5, Interesting)
Because it's not OSS, it won't run on many of my machines (where mozilla and KHTML will). They have a reasonable number of platforms but are still missing StrongArm/Linux (half my machines).
Re:obvious why (Score:2, Interesting)
Opera is a XHTML/Flash and multimedia capable browser can run in very funny memory place.
Their recent "Opera Mini" is kind of amazing too. We are speaking about a 98KB browser running on J2ME phone. Note I have Sony Ericsson k700i and it has "Hi Fi" version, I think the 'Lo Fi' version is even less!
Opera is soon (if not already,not following scene lately) on TV Set top boxes, especially HDTV boxes too.
Also, IBM collabration promises a Voice XML browser that can run in a car dashboard.
Note, that is a 20-30 coder or little more company doing all that stuff. Of course, they have coders like guy who invented CSS etc
http://www.opera.com/products/ [opera.com]
ps: I was proven wrong on Mactel decision can't happen but I think Opera is not anyone's tiny shareware company that can be bought that easy. Look at their partners.
In fact, it looks like Opera is the real "year 2005" company as everything goes wireless and they have a working product which is tested/happily bought by millions.
Re:This is stupid. (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:2, Interesting)
As for the applications footprint - I couldn't speak to that since I've never benchmarked either of them. I just know that Firefox often has dozens of tabs opened on my system and it performs smoothly. And on the mobile front - I don't know who makes "Blaze" but that's what I use on my Treo 650 (it's the thing that comes installed on it). Then again, I've only browsed to one website one time in the two months I've owned it.
I just have a hard time believing that Google might go toward Opera and away from Firefox based on a little bit of extra performance or a shiny interface. After all, they could contribute to help Firefox with the first issue and they could modify it however they want to easily produce the second. It would also contribute to the respect that people have toward them for supporting open source and doing little to no evil.
I think there's something else going on.
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:2, Interesting)
The only way this would make sense to me is if they were going to merge the codebases of Opera and Mozilla.
Is this why they started giving it away? (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:5, Interesting)
I just wish it had better javascript error reporting for debuggin JS. The javascript console in Firefox is the best error reporting I've found so far.
Google Toolbar for Opera (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:A bloody nose for Google? (Score:3, Interesting)
I'm starting to think to think that all these Google rumors are strategically placed to pull Microsoft in 100 different directions simultaneously. One way to keep them just spinning their wheels is to force them to develop every product type-X just to prevent Google getting the drop on them with their own type-X product. Microsoft has become the quintessential follower, and these rumors are enough to lead them around by their noses. How many things that Google actually released were preceded by a long swarm of rumors? Maybe Gmail, and even that wasn't very long. I think the safe bet is that if it's a Google rumor, it's false. Compare this to Apple: They seem to leak enough so that the rumor mill is surprisingly reliable. Google is a completely different animal; I suspect they use rumors in a strategy of befuddlement.
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:4, Interesting)
I use a 19" LCD screen perched 3' away on the back of a big table, to give me plenty of space to work. When I'm leaned back in my chair with my feet up, some images are a little hard to see. Image Zoom is wonderful for that. Just a right and a left click, and my image is zoomed in.
While I have stumbleupon and forecast fox installed, I haven't used either in months. The above 2-3 extensions combined with adblock and flashblock are the primary ones I use.
Re:This is stupid. Maybe not (Score:3, Interesting)
I would go one further: mobile thin clients for the masses.
I'm talking about a very simple mobile device similar to a laptop, with wifi, but with extremely limited hardware. All it can run is Opera and perhaps Google Talk. Access to the web and GMail is all that many people would need (if they switch to using a GMail account). Ajax provides capability to develop desktop-like experiences in the browser.
With minimal hardware requirements, this should be very inexpensive. It may sound crazy, but if you put all the peices to the puzzle (the products that Google has acquired or built and the people Google has hired) it makes sense.
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:3, Interesting)
Absolutely 100% same story here. I was a big safari supporter, always trying new browsers though, firefox, opera, none of them were fast enough for me, opera opened fast enough, but.. I dunno, I still liked safari better. Firefox is actually quite a bit slower than safari for me, but I can't use safari anymore, #1 reason, extensions. I've got mouse gestures which I've grown dependent on, forecastfox which, although it's not a necessity, it's pretty cool. I recently added adblock though, and it made a lot of the pages I frequent a lot more tollerable. That and FlashBlock.. Now I've got Mouse Gestures, no ads, no flash, and a weather forecast and everything tuned to look and feel and behave exactly as I want it to... I'll sacrafice a little speed for the functionality. One other thing, I can't even really imagine any other browser, even if they added extensions, having them catch on to the degree of the mozilla folks, you can find extensions for everything on these things.. I'm hooked.
That being said, I love Opera and consider it a GREAT browser, if firefox didn't have me in a stranglehold, I'd definitely be using that instead.
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:3, Interesting)
I don't know what Google's intent is (or even if this is just a rumour), but I'd venture a guess that it isn't about desktop.
Re:Lets hope they open source it (Score:4, Interesting)
Opera's default behavior is tabbed. Everything, everywhere, uses tabs. A page wants a new window? Have a new tab. You have to explicitly tell it to split a tab off into a new window. And all those tabs behave as MDI windows inside the Opera parent window, so pages that want to be small can be small, or I can tile pages, or whatever.