Follow Slashdot blog updates by subscribing to our blog RSS feed

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
The Internet Government Software Politics

EU to Develop Search Engine 460

William Robinson writes "Digital Media is reporting that French President Jacques Chirac is making plans for a European search engine called "Quaero" to rival US internet companies such as Yahoo and Google. From the article: 'Those involved in the Quaero project, including Thomson, France Telecom and Deutsche Telekom, have said that it will be much more than a typical search engine. It will provide an array of multimedia tools for identifying and indexing images, sound and text. Quaero will also reportedly include a powerful translating tool which will be able to 'understand' audio as well as text. The developers plan to make Quaero available on all platforms, including PCs, mobile devices and digital TVs.'"
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

EU to Develop Search Engine

Comments Filter:
  • Quaero.com taken (Score:3, Insightful)

    by digitaldc ( 879047 ) * on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:09PM (#14484049)
    Q: How exactly does Quaero translate: "Google is the best internet search engine ever made."
    Inquiring minds want to know.

    Check out http://www.quaero.com/ [quaero.com] - its a marketing company from Charlotte, North Carolina.
  • by ZachPruckowski ( 918562 ) <zachary.pruckowski@gmail.com> on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:10PM (#14484066)
    If it is something run by the EU, it's going to face a lot of political hurdles. I recognize that gov'ts are sometimes better at providing these services than companies, but the EU has a whole lot more red tape to get through than most other gov't organizations. And the French President supporting it is no promise it'll happen. He lost the vote to ratify the EU constitution in his country.

    I'm not saying it won't happen, just that it'll face lots of problems in a new governmental organization that is still trying to get its feet under it.
  • Doomed to failure? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Z0mb1eman ( 629653 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:10PM (#14484073) Homepage
    As much as I'd like to see something like this happen - it's a huge project, led by SEVERAL governments and telecom companies, neither of which are exactly known for efficiency or technical brilliance. And it doesn't seem like there's much profit incentive, which makes it even less likely to be finished efficiently...

    It's great that the EU is trying to assert itself in this area - having the US control 90% of the internet's technology is exactly the type of monoculture that is decried on the desktop - but is there any way this project won't end up crushed under the weight of its own bureaucracy?
  • Re:Why? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:11PM (#14484087)
    The market does not solve every problem. The market has failed to provide affordable health care for every American and those who call themselves Christians have failed to pick up where the market has left off. I left my church because the governing council was more interested in how to decorate the church for Easter than in how to feed the hungry two blocks away.
  • Missing Feature (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Jerf ( 17166 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:11PM (#14484088) Journal
    It will also include a multi-lingual pony.

    You know, I thought marketing vaporware claims were bad, but political marketing vaporware, now that's whole new dimensions of vapor. It's bad enough when marketing has excessive influence on tech development, can you imagine what it'll be like when politicians are involved as a matter of "national prestige"? I have not the humor chops to properly satirize that.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:12PM (#14484098)
    Shades of the Nixon-Khrushchev "kitchen debate".

    The Soviets turned their national scientific and research genius into making *one* perfect washing machine, as the foolish Americans splintered their effort among competing companies tearing each other to shreds in destructive competition over shape and color.

    "Today, we are behind you. Soon we will be even with you, and we shall pass you, in glorious progress toward perfect socialism and communism!" (or something like that).

    How can feeble, fractured American enterprises like Yahoo and Google survive competition with the might of central, coordinated European industrial policy???

    Right.
  • by Chineseyes ( 691744 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:12PM (#14484102)
    Why everything american must be reinvented and/or redone? Mod me down if you must but I just dont get it. Seems like a huge waste of money to me but maybe I'm missing something.
  • by Aphrika ( 756248 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:18PM (#14484172)
    1. Try and come up with a domain name that isn't ambiguous in how it's said or spelt.

    2. Start asking us EU citizens if we'd mind you spending our cash on something that isn't really required

    3. get out of the mindset that the internet is somehow defined by geographical borders and edges - just what is an EU search engine? Does it just search the EU? What?

    4. How about attacking the problem of low tech-esteem in Europe not by building a government-sponsered programme (which no doubt will require taxpayers money to be thrown at it year on year), but by fostering an environment where private tech companies can flourish (like in the US).

  • by DrXym ( 126579 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:20PM (#14484188)
    No one is going to have the foggiest idea how to type quero, queero, quato, kumquat, kuato or whatever the hell it is into their addrees bar.
  • by bvwj ( 473084 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:21PM (#14484193)
    Q:Why re-invent the wheel?
    A:Ego

    Also, it's not European companies, it's a European govenrment subsidising European companies.
  • by bwd ( 936324 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:27PM (#14484255) Homepage
    It will fail if it is backed by Germany and France. Both of those countries have laws which force companies to filter hate speech, or at the very least help track the people down. That overhead, which Google doesn't have to deal with, will weigh heavy on their ability to offer untainted search results. That's in addition to other government red tape. That's a huge burden that Google doesn't have.
  • by undeadly ( 941339 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:30PM (#14484278)
    Yet, this story has nothing to do with the US or politics really. What the EU does shouldn't be in this section.

    In this you are very wrong. This is all about politics: get control of vital resources. EU views USA with Bush II in power with deep scepticism, and tries to wrestle as much control as they can since USA has become sort of unreliable. Quite simply, enemies of USA is scared more than ever and close allies are apprehensive. Those that thinks this is good are fools (not that I suggest that you thinks so).

  • by undeadly ( 941339 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:32PM (#14484302)
    Also, it's not European companies, it's a European govenrment subsidising European companies.

    This aptly describes US defence and areospace industry.

  • by MetalliQaZ ( 539913 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:36PM (#14484338)
    Putting together a project like that simply because they don't want to use commercial offerings based in the United States is stupid. Without solid motivation, ingenuity and demand, it is doomed to fail.

    -d
  • by bombadillo ( 706765 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:38PM (#14484359)
    Japan to develop it's own cars... oh wait
  • Let's make a bet (Score:2, Insightful)

    by dada21 ( 163177 ) * <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:40PM (#14484369) Homepage Journal
    Take people with the same energy as those who work for the DMV, and put them up against people with the same energy as those who work for your average car dealer.

    Train both sets of people to become software developers.

    Let's bet on the outcome. Public programmers are shams just like public workers in any public office. Cronying at best, lazy worthless animals at worst.

    How Europeans continually think that they can compete by removing competition and giving it to government is beyond me.
  • Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by DoorFrame ( 22108 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:41PM (#14484380) Homepage
    Well, yeah, but the market hasn't failed to produce an adequate search engine.
  • Re:Why? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by 955301 ( 209856 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:45PM (#14484423) Journal
    the market isn't in charge of healthcare in America. Healthcare here is recovering from a hobbling brought on by the insistence that your employer is responsible for your health and because insurance companies dilute the sting of the overpriced costs. So before it gets better, it has to get worse. But if it's left to the same pressures that drive stereos, gym memberships and washing machines, it would be a non-issue.

    And you really expect a self serving religious movement to exercise compassion efficiently? Compassionate people excercise compassion, not community organizations. Get enough money in an org and the greedy come in and push the compassion right out the door.

  • Say what? (Score:2, Insightful)

    by Mindjiver ( 71 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:48PM (#14484464) Homepage
    When has a government ever provided a service like this that is better and cheaper than what the market would have produced?
  • by Nutria ( 679911 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:50PM (#14484489)
    at least they're building search engines and space exploration vehicles instead of nuclear weapons.

    You do realize, don't you, that France is a nuclear power[0], and sold[1] to Iraq 12.5kg of 93% U-235 and "research reactor".

    And lets not forget the direct German help[2] in creating Iraqi chemical weapons.

    [0] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/France_and_weapons_of _mass_destruction [wikipedia.org]
    [1] http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/facility/osiraq .htm [fas.org]
    [2] http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/iraq/cw/az120103.htm l [fas.org]
  • by SmallFurryCreature ( 593017 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @03:53PM (#14484519) Journal
    Why did Nasa go into space when the russians had already done it? Why do anything if somebody else has already done it.

    The following bit of info may shock some people so please, little kids leave the room, adults brace youreselve.

    GOOGLE SUCKS AS A SEARCH ENGINE

    Anyone still around? Good, we judge google by its peers and its peers are the totall crappers so by comparison google looks pretty good. BUT imagine that the people at google had thought "Oh, there already is a search engine no need to make another." We would still be using altavista or something.

    Google is fairly good at returning pages regarding obscure linux error messages. When however your search should include words in common usage or possible of a retail product or god forbid be associated in anyway with the adult industry then you are floundering in page after page of crap results.

    There is an even worse problem. Despite all what the fanboys will tell you Google is a business. A business that now not just provides search and ads but is becoming a content broker itself.

    Could google one day prefer its own pages over others? For now the opposite it seems, I can't get google to return its own videos that it sells BUT some goverments might feel that internet search has become such an important tool that there is some importance to having an alternative to just depending on the US.

    America is a funny country, ever since WW2 america has been complaining that it has to do foot the bill for the entire world defence. Europe thinks of creating a european army and the US gets upset. US taxpayer pay for the free GPS of the entire world and they complain. EU makes it own version and americans get upset.

    Here is a suggestion for americans, you run your country your way and we run ours our way.

    What you are missing is that not every goverment has the same motives. Perhaps some feel that not being a slave to america is a good thing. Since you aren't paying for it with your taxes what business is it of yours?

  • by SmallFurryCreature ( 593017 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @04:02PM (#14484607) Journal
    The tech industry in america is floundering. Oh sure there are some success stories just check Apple, an all american product. Wich state is China in anyway?

    But I got a suggestion for any eu citizen who thinks the US is heaven on earth. Emigrate. It is actually fairly easy provided you got some half decent job skills and money. No you are not allowed to say anything bad about US immigration policy, remember, your a US fanboy.

    1. Pff, I link to it once and that is it. I can always google for it

    2. I rather they spend it on this then on a war.

    3. Perhaps a search engine that does not bow to the Chinese goverment in the name of the almighty dollar?

    4. Yeah, because the top cellphone company is european and all your pc's are made in the US. No I rather we keep our model. So do the majority of EU voters. EU socialist, US capatalist. Move to location of your choice.

  • by slashdotmsiriv ( 922939 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @04:12PM (#14484705)
    Are you suggesting that Europe does not protect freedom speech as much as the US does? Every nation and region has its own sensitivities. The same way ur channels do not show nudity on TV or ban elicit wording, that states impose all those stupid and extreme restrictions on alcohol consumption, and everything else that falls under the category of Fun, Europe is more sensitive with the issue of racism, anti-simitism and naziism. The difference is that Europe has every reason to place laws again hate speech (Remember the WWII and who got screwed by that?), while the only reasons most US states have to prohibit Fun is their religious fanatisism, neo-conservatism and dark ages obsessions similar to the ones that brought ID to us. I suggest that you be careful next time you accuse Europe for suppression of freedoms. To answer your question, no they will not block anything, EU is not China regardless of what those guys of Fox news are trying to convince you. Nazis and other weirdos have their newspapers etc, the only difference is that they are a lot more restricted in terms of creating a political party or demonstrating. And of course this varies from country to country.
  • by Mindjiver ( 71 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @04:14PM (#14484713) Homepage
    Yeah, that is true

    I was mostly speaking of the french political elite which does seem to have no idea what they are doing. I would recommend them to read Frédéric Bastiat ;)
  • by lbrandy ( 923907 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @04:23PM (#14484810)
    Well, at least they're building search engines and space exploration vehicles instead of nuclear weapons.

    Considering France has nuclear weapons, and the US is building both search engines and space exploration vehicles... I am reminded of the great quote by Pauli... your statement, frankly, "isn't even wrong".
  • Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by greythax ( 880837 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @04:49PM (#14485037)
    But if it's left to the same pressures that drive stereos, gym memberships and washing machines, it would be a non-issue.

    This is, most likely, not the case. Healthcare, like gasoline, fresh water, and electricity is less an elective service, and more of a utility. In order to survive, you will most likely need health care at some point. It is highly unlikely that you will shop around while your appendix is bursting. And ultimately, you will pay whatever they tell you to pay, because you could die without it. In fact, a company could raise its profits considerably by raising the cost of curing whatever Bill Gates happens to have at the moment to 1 billion dollars. Huge profits and you only have to pay a few doctors to do it. Forget everyone else; you were only getting 20 bucks profit off of them anyhow. I realize this is an extreme example, but I use it to illustrate a principle.

    It is unlikely that the free market will ever take over your municipality's provision of water to your home, due to the incredible cost involved to compete over a low priced product. The same holds true with your current energy provider. Also, there is unlikely to be a business to spring up that will remove the dead people who had no health care littering your streets and causing disease, as this is the sort of thing that only governments, through some law or measure, have proven in the past that they will respond to.

    Please remember, there have been several times in human history where the totally free market concept has been in full effect and found severely wanting.
  • by xcomm ( 638448 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @04:51PM (#14485055)
    Greeting from Europe,

    you may or or less right with your claims.

    >You do realize, don't you, that France is a nuclear power[0], and sold[1] to Iraq 12.5kg of
    >93% U-235 and "research reactor".

    >And lets not forget the direct German help[2] in creating Iraqi chemical weapons.

    But, I have at first the pictures in my mind, where Rumsfeld is meeting Sadam selling him US C-Waepons.

    Or, maybe you remember the Antrax hipe? Wasn't it come from your own laboratories?

    So the best would be to sweap before our own doors - right?
  • by zeux ( 129034 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @05:01PM (#14485122)
    You do realize, don't you, that France is a nuclear power[0], and sold[1] to Iraq 12.5kg of 93% U-235 and "research reactor".
    ... and they used it to build a ton of WMDs that we know they are hiding. We know where the WMDs are, they are near Bagdad, North, South, West and East of Bagdad.

    You americans are soooooooooo funny.
  • Sheesh (Score:3, Insightful)

    by AceJohnny ( 253840 ) <jlargentaye&gmail,com> on Monday January 16, 2006 @05:10PM (#14485197) Journal
    Disclaimer: I'm (mostly) french.

    This isn't the first time our dear (cough) beloved (gak) President presses for a catch-up plan in the digital world. Remember he started a project to digitize our paper legacy, in an attempt to counter Google's similar but english-language project.

    Now I can vaguely undestand the motivation behind such a move: present a counter force against english-language cultural domination. (considering how China is growing, I'm not sure american culture is the one to be feared in the coming century). This *is* a cultural problem on the internet. I'd rather we all speak a common language, but to each his own.

    Maybe he's trying to get his name in the history books for starting such projects. People tend to try that when they get to that age. I could understand that too.

    Of course, this project would be in direct competition with Google, such as it's presented. It strikes me as basic economic common sense that a trans-european politically-led project has not a snowball's chance in hell in any market competition.

    Maybe as an academic project?...
  • by Stan Vassilev ( 939229 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @05:16PM (#14485248)
    First they felt bad US owns the backbone of Internet so they stepped up to control it and/or make their own "European Internet".

    Now that it didn't quote work our, they decided to settle for the next big thing, which is have their own "European Search Engine".

    What the hell is that? A joke? And I actually live in Europe so it hurts to say this. I'd be proud if an European company comes up with "the next Google" but coming from the French government it comes up as a "me too" behaviour.
  • by F_Scentura ( 250214 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @05:45PM (#14485555)
    "Not that Google in France or Germany would allow you to, either."

    What the hell are you talking about?

    http://www.google.de/search?hl=de&q=nazi&btnG=Goog le-Suche&meta= [google.de]
    http://www.google.fr/search?hl=fr&q=Nazi&btnG=Rech erche+Google&meta= [google.fr]
  • by ostiguy ( 63618 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @05:51PM (#14485598)
    Do you honestly expect Europe, the Europe that is seriously considering lifting its arms embargo against China, to not have its search engine bow to the whims of the Chinese government?
  • Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by fishybell ( 516991 ) <fishybell.hotmail@com> on Monday January 16, 2006 @06:19PM (#14485884) Homepage Journal
    Was Google's technology created from the market?

    Yes. Google's founders are part of the market. Even if they developed a lot of it in college, they were still acting to fill a void in the market.
    Or maybe was the DARPA-Internet created from the market?

    Maybe you interpreted "true need" improperly. The internet was not a need before it existed. It has since become a need.
  • Google sucks? (Score:1, Insightful)

    by balloot ( 943499 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @06:36PM (#14486063)
    If Google sucks, name something better. It's idiocy to say "Google sucks and only is popular because everything sucks more."

    News flash: SEARCH IS DIFFICULT. Yes, it would be nice if someone made a search engine that could read our minds and deliver exactly what we want. But the fact that a problem has a perfect solution doesn't mean that it is possible to get to that solution. I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for a "good" search engine to come along - if you are, you obviously don't understand the complexities of the problem.
  • And on the whole, I'd feel safer with a government run search engine than with a profit motivated one.

    Uh, I hate to tell you this, but it is almost certain that any government-run project will also be, in some way, profit motivated. And unlike the corporate-run project, it won't be readily apparent exactly what the objectives are because you can't easily see where the profit is going (or coming from, for that matter).

  • by billstewart ( 78916 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @08:38PM (#14487023) Journal
    Search engine dominance isn't an embedded infrastructure contest like railroad dominance - it's a popularity contest that can change in a heartbeat if something better comes along. Google became popular and crowded out its competition because it was a fundamentally friendlier engine, not in the sense of having syntactic sugar and flashy decorations like Hotwired, but in the sense of producing highly relevant results up front instead of mixing them randomly through the 50,000 matches for your search terms, indexing more of the web than most of the competitors, and being lightning fast as well, which it could do partly because its interface was lean and clean. Google as a business has some stickiness because of its popularity, which enabled it to raise enough cash in the market to hire the best and brightest to do new cool stuff, and they keep adding more cool stuff, and maybe some of that will add some business relationship stickiness that will keep other people around in addition to the popularity contest, but the fundamentals are still about having the quality it takes to maintain the popularity.

    Perhaps Chirac can win part of the popularity contest in France by getting some academics and engineers to produce a service that's elegant, efficient, and French, something with the spirit of Eiffel as opposed to Inspector Clouseau or Derrida or De Gaulle or Sartre. Or perhaps he can pull off another Minitel - lightweight and pretty lame but good enough to get the job done given the lack of competition. And hopefully he can produce something that provides really good access to the information produced by the French government. But bureaucratic fiat isn't the way to produce popularity - you need a combination of luck, really really good technical skills, willingness to experiment, and a deep understanding of what your potential customers might want, and usually bureaucratic fiat produces things like bureaucrats and Fiats.

  • by frost22 ( 115958 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @10:43PM (#14487631) Homepage
    Perhaps Chirac can win part of the popularity contest in France
    Forget it. I'm a European myself, and I've seen that kind of projects. Plenty of them. They all fails, especially the French ones. There is a whole scene of companies that do nothing than burning through European subsidies, project after project after project. They complete them, boast about them, and then bury them. That works especially well when you add in that Gallic talent for just accidently and by chance always hiring well connected french companies only in European projects.

    Look who's in the boat here - that reads like a who is who of the Public Fundinds Burning Society. Deutsche Telekom, France Telekom, both fornmer state monopolists, Thomson, french electronics giant and perpetual receiver of ample state subsidies. The rest is probably of similar calibre.
    and usually bureaucratic fiat produces things like bureaucrats and Fiats
    While your intent here is right and the wordplay is cute, that's deeply offensive to a great Italian car tradition that is way more succesfull and receptive to their customers needs than any EU buerocrats pet project ever could be.
  • Re:Why? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by evilviper ( 135110 ) on Monday January 16, 2006 @11:14PM (#14487776) Journal
    This is, most likely, not the case. Healthcare, like gasoline, fresh water, and electricity is less an elective service, and more of a utility.

    That's strange, those all sound ideally suited for the market.

    Water, for instance, doesn't involve the utilities so much anymore. People drive to a store and pick-up a forklift-load of bottled water, or they have 5 gallon bottles delivered. People get to decide how much they are willing to pay, and what level of quality they require. I wouldn't be surprised if, in the near future, the utilities at least in Southern California will only be providing "grey" water, since they have so seriously screwed up what was previously drinking water.

    Gasoline is bought and sold as a commodity. The problems with gasoline right now are the oil companies acting like a oligopoly, and the US government not doing their job to stop it.

    With deregulation, customers can buy their electricity from any company they chose. They have to pay a base fee for the utility to maintain the lines, but it's largely capable of being market-driven.

    For healthcare, you've only listed the most critical situation, as if it's typical. The large majority of health care costs are not from your surgery in the emergency room. When you have any disease that won't kill you in the next 24 hours, you have every opportunity to shop-around for a less expensive but fully qualified doctor/hospital/etc. I know most people do this for things like dentists, as that's less commonly covered under company health-care.

    I have to agree with the OP that it's the socialized aspect of US healthcare that has caused medical prices to skyrocket. Doctors will ask you if you have insurance before they want to know anything else about you... If you have insurance, then they'll insist on running a large number of unnecessary tests to inflate the bill. They give uninsured people a break, but by virtue of being able to scam more money out of insured patients, it drives up the cost to the uninsured as well.

    Please remember, there have been several times in human history where the totally free market concept has been in full effect and found severely wanting.

    Please list a few. There are always the extrordinary situations, but it works pretty well.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday January 17, 2006 @05:50AM (#14489082)
    (just like those guys who constantly bash France and its military history, comfortably sitting at their desk, when a dozen of their guys explode every day at the other side of the world).
    maybe they shouldn't be on the other side of the world, invading other countries? just a thought.

Those who can, do; those who can't, write. Those who can't write work for the Bell Labs Record.

Working...