Linus Says No GPLv3 for the Linux Kernel 415
HenchmenResources writes "Late Wednesday a posting from Linus Torvalds appered on the the Linux Kernel Mailing List. In it Linus states that the Linux Kernel will remain under the GPLv2. Types Linus,"The "version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version" language in the GPL copying file is not - and has never been - part of the
actual License itself.""
I GNU it! (Score:4, Funny)
Nothing to see here, please move along.
Re:What v3 does he mean? (Score:3, Funny)
One great means of achieving this mis-characterization is to apply the old formula: "a text without a context is a pretext".
Re:Don't see how this is a story. (Score:2, Funny)
Whilst I wouldn't mind being the liason to contact Jennifer Love Hewitt for extended "meetings" and "negotiations," I don't believe she does much coding.
Re:Linus is wrong (Score:3, Funny)
To quote the key section:
If the Program does not specify a version number of this License, you may choose any version ever published by the Free Software Foundation.
That just gave me an idea on how Microsoft and others could destroy Linux and other OSS...
Step 1: Take over FSF
Step 2: Turn GPL into a more BSD like license
Step 3: ???
Step 4: Profit!
And I think we all know what could and would happen for Step 3.
JLH??? (Score:3, Funny)
Juicy Lumpy Hamburgers?
Just Limp Humphrey?
Re:Same old (Score:2, Funny)
GPLv3 is still in development (Score:3, Funny)
--Ajay
Re:What v3 does he mean? (Score:4, Funny)
Welcome to the wonderful world of GNU!