Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Google Businesses Security Sun Microsystems The Internet IT

Google's Anti-Spyware Project 185

peterfa writes "Sun and Google have teamed up and started a project called Stop Badware. This project aims to expose all the spyware and adware bundled in software and the companies that are responsible. While it's funded by Sun and Google, the research will be done by Oxford and Harvard."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Google's Anti-Spyware Project

Comments Filter:
  • Google Toolbar? (Score:4, Interesting)

    by BEI01 ( 567185 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @07:50PM (#14574262)
    I wonder if Google Toolbar will be included in this.
  • by orangeguru ( 411012 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @07:51PM (#14574268) Homepage
    We need spyware killers and better protection - not more academic research. They should fund some OS project to help users.
  • How? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by imoou ( 949576 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @07:52PM (#14574276) Homepage
    The article is light on how the project actually works, do users have to install some sort of detecting tools which alerts them of badware upon download and/or prior to installation?

    Is this going to be like the spamm blacklists which can be subjective?
  • by Tuxedo Jack ( 648130 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @07:52PM (#14574281) Homepage
    His research in regards to this matter is invaluable, and it's arguable that he's the leading authority on who's bankrolling crapware.
  • Excellent! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by rob_squared ( 821479 ) <rob@rob-squa r e d .com> on Thursday January 26, 2006 @07:55PM (#14574308)
    Not because google is handling funding, but that an organization that doesn't have a vested interest in such business persuits is doing the actual work.

    PS: I'm waiting for Google to annouce its plan for world peace.
  • Re:How? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Tlosk ( 761023 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @07:56PM (#14574321)
    Personally I'd be satisfied with some sort of a trusted archive that allows you to research different programs/sites/companies. There's a lot of info available on the web but most of it is buried in tech forums or as come ons for dubious spyware removal programs, both of which you're never really confident about the truth. That way it wouldn't be just a yay or nay that goes on under the covers, but a place where you could find out what a program's issues are, or the track record of a developer.
  • by doxology ( 636469 ) <[ude.tim] [ta] [dyzzoc]> on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:02PM (#14574370) Homepage
    Especially strange since Stanford's president is on Google's Board of Directors...
  • Wrong format?? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by dada21 ( 163177 ) * <adam.dada@gmail.com> on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:06PM (#14574404) Homepage Journal
    Would something like this work better as a wiki? Sort of open-ended peer-reviewed?

    Maybe it might get cluttered with junk, too, though, hmm.

    I wonder if a pseudo-moderated wiki capacity for a truly open editable document might work. Weighted by the user's real time previous moderations (+5 Neutral, -5 Troll, etc).

    That leads me to the point, actually -- are there specifications for an open editable moderated document that falls towards neutrality in facts?
  • Re:Excellent! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by imoou ( 949576 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:08PM (#14574422) Homepage
    Google's income comes from advertising, and these spywares are showing ads, hence competiting for eyeballs, I would say Google has a large interest in squashing these competitors.
  • by slashkitty ( 21637 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:09PM (#14574426) Homepage
    Notice how the site has a forum, on google groups. The ADS on those pages are for adware based spyware removers! Google makes millions if not billions from adware/spyware companies who advertise on google and google affiliates. Lots of standard searches like "screensavers" and "smilies" will bring up adware, and if you search for a spyware removal tool, you'll likely get some even worse spyware than you had before. If Google wanted to do good (and not be evil) they would BAN spyware, adware and badware from AdSense, and they'd filter them from the listings! Who's with me?
  • Re:Sun??? (Score:2, Interesting)

    by snitmo ( 901312 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:16PM (#14574496)
    But why is Sun in on this?

    Marketting value. Somebody in the management thinks "Teaming up with Google, Oxford and Harvard" is cool.

  • by slashkitty ( 21637 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:34PM (#14574629) Homepage
    They don't even have to ban/censor it from the search results. They could provide a filter like with adult search. Have an option: a) I'd like search results with out Adware/Spyware b) I'd like to infect my computer from your search results, give me all the adware you got!
  • Re:Damage control (Score:3, Interesting)

    by dangitman ( 862676 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:41PM (#14574690)
    If you expect them to pick #2, you're a damn fool.

    I don't expect them to not do that. But it would be nice if they stopped pretending to do no evil. I don't see any exemption in their statement saying that evil is OK, as long as millions are to be made.

  • by chris411 ( 610359 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @08:57PM (#14574799)
    I often get paid to provide tech support to friends and other people from my area (just a modest village) for a few bucks. Recently, our local ISP not only provided us with DSL, but also a special offer that includes a payment plan for a (cheap) Dell computer if you sign up for DSL for a year.

    You would not believe the number of computers that went out of commission within the first month just from being overloaded with spyware/adware. I often feel the urge to tell them "Stop surfing pr0n sites. Stop clicking on everything in sight just because it tells you to click it."

    But I don't. Because I know that as soon as I fix it, they'll just ask me to come over again within a few weeks. I seriously doubt they would listen anyway. As I said, easy money.

  • Good idea but... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Ekhymosis ( 949557 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @10:04PM (#14575133) Homepage
    Wouldn't that lead them to being sued by companies saying "oh, our software isn't spyware, its useful!" and other rubbish? I recall reading about a few antispyware companies and/or researchers threatened with lawsuits (or even sued) because their research was "defaming" said company or "misleading" the public about their supposed "valuable" product. In this day and age, with the ridiculous litigious society we live in, how is this project going to fare? I hope they do succeed, however. I'm fed up with crapware.
  • by MindPrison ( 864299 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @10:08PM (#14575153) Journal
    It really should be obvious - but most of us are so used to Google by now that we might be too comfy.

    Google has an enormous information gathering capability. Seen those Goooooooogle ADS everywhere? While it may not be spy-WARE per say... it certainly feeds you a cookie. Noticed how MANY of these Goooooogle ADS sites there are? Theyre just popping up everywhere arent they?! Yes they are - and you dont even give it a second thought while you throw yourself into the Google anti-spyware projects. Google dont want competitors. A Spyware program is a competitor of Google as it gathers information about the users surfing habits just like Google does - but in a much more intrusive way (well...at least if feels that way).

    Are we getting the picture yet?

  • by evilsofa ( 947078 ) on Thursday January 26, 2006 @10:19PM (#14575218)
    This past week I've been helping one of my friends remove spyware from his computer. All he did was hook up to a relative's cable to download a large update file, and in the space of a couple of hours, his unprotected PC got loaded down with several DOZEN virii including VX2, smartloadb, Virtumundo, etc.

    Google believes click fraud to be the most significant threat to the internet. This makes sense because click fraud is what makes all the malware, adware and virii PROFITABLE. What Google and Sun are doing with stopbadware.org is their answer to that. And it's an answer that is needed badly.

    Why? As a very recent veteran of attempting to remove malware, I can tell you that the good side of this war is terribly, horribly disorganized. Let me explain:

    If you get a massive infection of various kinds of malware, or if you want to protect yourself against all this stuff, you have to:

    1. Protect yourself with a firewall (software example: Zonealarm)
    2. Run or have available an antitrojan application (example: Trojan Hunter)
    3. Run an antivirus program (commercial examples: Norton or McAfee; freeware example: Grisoft AVG Free)
    4. Run several antispyware programs (examples: Spybot, Lavasoft Adaware, Microsoft Antispyware)
    5. Use something like merijn.org's HiJackThis to find out what your system is infected with that all of the above cannot detect
    6. If you're infected with something difficult like VX2 that can't be detected by ANY of the above, you may also need to hunt down very specific helper scripts and applications to deal with it, or even worse figure out how to remove it manually (which is generally VERY technical and difficult).

    So, you have firewall, antitrojan, antivirus, antispyware and detection all covered by entirely different industries, most of which don't have much overlap (antivirus programs still do little against antispyware, for example). In the antispyware category, none of the legit programs can detect everything, so you need to run several of them.

    You also have the fact that most of these anti-malware companies are commercial; they need to make money doing what they do, because what they do is very difficult, very technical, and has to be done VERY FAST. You see freeware versions, probably because they can't stand to see people who can't afford all these applications get run into the ground by the malware industry.

    It doesn't help at all that you've got hundreds - literally, hundreds - of malware installers masquerading as antispyware, antitrojan and antivirus programs. The antispyware industry has had no choice but to put up www.spywarrior.com just so people can sort out the few good ones from the many bad ones. That site is run by one of the legit companies. That company would obviously much rather have nonprofit, noncommercial oversight declaring who is legit and who isn't - it puts a commercial company in an uncomfortable ethical position to be declaring legitimacy of other companies in its industry. But I don't see that they had any choice; to not do it would be even worse.

    It looks like that is what badware.org is intended to be, and what is so badly needed - a nonprofit organization that has no base or funding from within the antimalware industries, to oversee and report on those industries.

    Do you know what the process for cleaning an infected computer is right now? You post HiJackThis logs to a variety of different forums (just google "HiJackThis Logfile" for a sample) and people voluntarily, out of the goodness of their hearts, help you with incredibly technical removal procedures (google "VX2 removal" to see what I mean). If you want to look up these removal procedures yourself, you google around on various antispyware and antivirus web sites with various descriptions (often vague or assuming you have their commercial product). It's horribly disorganized, with different antivirus companies calling each virus by a different name. A good example: try and find out how to tell the difference between a Lo
  • by queenb**ch ( 446380 ) on Friday January 27, 2006 @01:04AM (#14576207) Homepage Journal
    I've been running OSX now for about 3 years. I have *NO* antivirus software. I have *NO* antispware. The really telling thing is that I also have *NO* problems! The best thing about OSX is that I just don't need any of this stuff. At this point in the game, it is completely irrelevant to me.

    For all you Microsoft users who are trapped in your ActiveX hell, I feel for you. I have only one thing to say, "Free your OS and your @ss will follow!"

    2 cents,

    Queen B
  • Comment removed (Score:2, Interesting)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Friday January 27, 2006 @07:39AM (#14577464)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • Re:Harvord! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by capefear ( 878639 ) on Friday January 27, 2006 @02:54PM (#14581360)
    Now if Google would only disclose how they use their own index and cross indexes between gmail and search, toolbar, etc, on their OWN user.

If you want to put yourself on the map, publish your own map.

Working...