Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Windows Operating Systems Software Bug Security

Installing Windows with Recent Updates? 223

MoJo asks: "As a computer technician, I have to re-install Windows often. It takes three attempts to complete Windows Update (get latest update software, validate Windows, download updates). It seems like all this clicking could be scripted somehow, but I can find no-one who has found a way of reducing the whole painful affair to just one or two clicks." Is there a way to build a Windows installation CD that includes the most recent set of updates?
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Installing Windows with Recent Updates?

Comments Filter:
  • by gEvil (beta) ( 945888 ) on Saturday January 28, 2006 @10:52PM (#14591396)
    Welcome to the world of site licenses and concurrent use licenses.
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Saturday January 28, 2006 @11:12PM (#14591484)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
  • by slaker ( 53818 ) on Saturday January 28, 2006 @11:52PM (#14591630)
    So it doesn't bother you to have lots of PCs on your network with identical SIDs?

    If you're taking the step of imaging, use Sysprep (google it) to make each install clean and unique, or at the very least find a copy of GHSTWALK.exe to run after the fact.
  • by Futurepower(R) ( 558542 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @12:18AM (#14591703) Homepage
    My understanding is that the ISO files don't help you at all. They are huge because they include all languages. Each ISO file includes only the critical updates for ONE month. I know of no way to integrate them into a single CD image containing Windows XP SP2 and all the critical updates.

    It is possible to download all the separate critical updates, and run them from a batch file. But that's a hassle; Microsoft does not make that easy. This is another way that Microsoft is adversarial towards customers; they waste the time of some of the best-educated people in the world.
  • by mnmn ( 145599 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @12:25AM (#14591723) Homepage
    Doesnt work too well for all apps, and youre keeping all your eggs in one basket there. Performance becomes an issue fast. Not to mention upgrading or restoring from backups becomes impossible without disrupting everyone's desktops settings and other files.

    Solutions like yours exist already. There are terminal client versions of XP and other companies including sun were selling real cheap graphic terminal thin clients a while ago. Not a smashing success.

    And yelling and screaming on slashdot doesnt convince anyone at all.
  • by rikkards ( 98006 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @12:25AM (#14591724) Journal
    I'm a little hazy on the legalities of this as well. The way it's always been explained to me is that you need a licnece of Ghost to create an image. Also, if you're running the full-on Windows client, you will of course need a license for that. However, I've always been told that when restoring an image to a PC, it is legally permitted to use the DOS version of Ghost without a licence for that PC. Now whether or not that's true, I'm not sure. I've never bothered to read the licence documentation, instead trusting the word of my higher ups.

    Nope you need to have a Ghost license for every single workstation that will have a Ghost image applied to it. I was involved in an update for a site of approx 17000 users and they mentioned that they would have to buy new licenses for all the machines if they decided to Ghost. They started investigating RIP from MS which comes free.

    Sysprep is your friend you can get the machine to do practically everything including join to a domain (use an account that only has permissions to join a domain so that you don't divulge a key account) as well as creating generic images. I had an image that would work on over 8 different desktops and about 6 laptops.
  • by MobileTatsu-NJG ( 946591 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @12:47AM (#14591790)
    "Its not that hard to use google. Do you realy want it that bad but are unwilling to search for it?"

    It's perfectly reasonable to want to hear the opinions of others that have gone through it. No need to be an asshole.

  • by Achromatic1978 ( 916097 ) <robert&chromablue,net> on Sunday January 29, 2006 @05:03AM (#14592406)
    You did notice that the search terms he fed into Google didn't include 'slipstreaming', but only a couple of keywords the questioner asked in the article?
  • by dotgain ( 630123 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @05:11AM (#14592420) Homepage Journal
    Install Cross-Over Office or WINE if you need to and your Windows applications work..
    No more issues.
    Yeah, sure looks like you've tried it...
  • by AlphaSys ( 613947 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @08:00AM (#14592694)
    If you haven't very demanding third-party driver support, install Automated Deployment Services [microsoft.com] (the successor to RIS) and slipstream your source. Stop wasting CDs and ISO burn time and do it in a truly manageable way. Even involved driver dependencies can be integrated, but you have to actually learn about what you're doing to make that happen. But when you need to deploy a lot of windows servers at once or the same kind over and over, this is the most straightforward way to get a consistent build and keep the patches current.
  • by baadger ( 764884 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @09:53AM (#14592897)
    It would be nice if Microsoft would make it easy to script the install onto one CD (or DVD).

    All hotfix installers released since XP-SP2 have had an /integrate switch to do just that.
  • by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 29, 2006 @11:13AM (#14593127)
    Please don't visit stories in which you have no interest.
  • by RandomJoe ( 814420 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @12:43PM (#14593469)
    Interesting. Provided the customer brings in their original install discs, just so you can prove they had them, how would MS or anyone KNOW that you used your own slipstreamed copy of the same version OS? Is there actually something individually keyed on each of those (non-corporate) versions? I always figured they were just identical discs. Then you plug in the customer's own license key at the end...

    Seems like as long as the customer shows up with a valid XP/2K/98/however-far-back-you-go CD, you'd be able to pull out your image of it and no one would be the wiser. Granted, it wouldn't have the brand-specific crap that gets loaded from the likes of Dell and Gateway, perhaps that's the issue.

    When you say "not ours, not an OEM disc, not a copy" do you actually mean you can't restore a customer's computer from one of those stupid "image" discs the OEMs were providing for a while?!? I as a customer would have major issues with that, considering that's the only "original" disk they provided. (Well, _I_ wouldn't... I never even boot Windows on my own new machines, but you know... ;) Did they provide a rational explanation for this bit?
  • WSUS (Score:2, Insightful)

    by bstempi ( 844043 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @02:26PM (#14593835)
    Windows Server Update Services.
    Instead of building a CD, I took into account that new updates will come out all of the time. Working in an environment of 150+ pcs, this also turns out to be a bandwidth hog. So, i turned to WSUS.

    Think of WSUS as a local MSUpdate repo. I tell the server what upates I want, it downloads them, and then distributes them. The only other thing i had to do was to adjust every computers group policy to look for updates from my server at midnight every night. Doing this under active directory is REALLY easy.

  • Re:Slipstreaming (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Karma Farmer ( 595141 ) on Sunday January 29, 2006 @11:24PM (#14596101)
    now go fix/explain American political "rhetoric" please.

    Public rhetoric in American politics has two parts:
    1. Cynical politicians pushing wedge issues to raise money for 527 / 501c4 organizations, and
    2. Cynical talking heads on 24-hour news stations yelling at each other about wedge issues to raise money for 527 / 501c4 organizations.
    Most of the public face of politics looks like a Jerry Springer show (and is about as real as the Jerry Springer show was) because our politicians find it immensely profitable. Divisive policies (like gay marriage or abortion) and divisive nominations (like Alito) are pushed by both sides because they're very successful fund raising mechanisms, not for ideological reasons.

    But frankly, I think we have to worry a lot more about the parts we don't see. The part of the iceberg above the water didn't sink the Titanic.

"But what we need to know is, do people want nasally-insertable computers?"

Working...